Experiences of health care professionals in intensive care when families participate in clinician handovers: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
Journal
JBI evidence synthesis
ISSN: 2689-8381
Titre abrégé: JBI Evid Synth
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101764819
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 08 2022
01 08 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
11
6
2022
medline:
18
8
2022
entrez:
10
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This review will evaluate the experiences of health care professionals in the intensive care unit when families participate in clinician handovers. Families of patients admitted to the intensive care unit report stress and anxiety. Family participation in multidisciplinary rounds in the intensive care unit may improve patient and family outcomes. However, health care professionals have different attitudes toward family participation. Furthermore, there is limited understanding of the barriers, facilitators, and other outcomes of family participation in clinician handovers for the patient, family, and health care professionals. The review will consider studies involving health care professionals (eg, nurses, physicians, allied health professionals) and any type of family participation, from bedside presence to participation in decision-making. Clinician handovers may be multidisciplinary ward rounds or nursing handovers. Settings may be the adult, pediatric, or neonatal intensive care unit in rural or metropolitan regions in any country. Studies in other clinical contexts will be excluded. Databases to be searched include CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus, PsycINFO, Embase, Emcare, Web of Science, and ProQuest Central. The search will be limited to articles written in English from 2000 to the present. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts, assess the full text of selected citations for inclusion, and assess methodological quality. A data extraction tool will be used, and findings will be assigned a level of credibility. Meta-aggregation will be used to synthesize findings. Disagreements between reviewers will be discussed to reach consensus; a third reviewer will be consulted if necessary. PROSPERO CRD42020223011.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35689175
doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00310
pii: 02174543-202208000-00009
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2048-2054Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 JBI.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Wong P, Liamputtong P, Koch S, Rawson H. Barriers to regaining control within a constructivist grounded theory of family resilience in ICU: living with uncertainty. J Clin Nurs 2017;26 (23–24):4390–4403.
Goldfarb M, Bibas L, Bartlett V, Jones H, Khan N. Outcomes of patient- and family-centered care interventions in the ICU: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 2017;45 (10):1751–1761.
Wong P, Redley B, Digby R, Correya A, Bucknall T. Families’ perspectives of participation in patient care in an adult intensive care unit: a qualitative study. Aust Crit Care 2020;33 (4):317–325.
van den Born-van Zanten SA, Dongelmans DA, Dettling-Ihnenfeldt D, Vink R, van der Schaaf M. Caregiver strain and posttraumatic stress symptoms of informal caregivers of intensive care unit survivors. Rehabil Psychol 2016;61 (2):173–178.
Davidson JE, Aslakson RA, Long AC, Puntillo KA, Kross EK, Hart J, et al. Guidelines for family-centered care in the neonatal, pediatric, and adult ICU. Crit Care Med 2017;45 (1):103–128.
Butler A, Copnell B, Willetts G. Family-centred care in the paediatric intensive care unit: an integrative review of the literature. J Clin Nurs 2013;23 (15–16):2086–2100.
McAndrew NS, Mark L, Butler M. Timely family feedback to guide family engagement in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Nurse 2020;40 (6):42–51.
Mitchell ML, Coyer F, Kean S, Stone R, Murfield J, Dwan T. Patient, family-centred care interventions within the adult ICU setting: an integrative review. Aust Crit Care 2016;29 (4):179–193.
Australian Commission on Safety, Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC). National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2021.
Kydonaki K, Takashima M, Mitchell M. Family ward rounds in intensive care: an integrative review of the literature. Int J Nurs Stud 2021;113:103771.
Ingram TC, Kamat P, Coopersmith CM, Vats A. Intensivist perceptions of family-centered rounds and its impact on physician comfort, staff involvement, teaching, and efficiency. J Crit Care 2014;29 (6):915–918.
Cody SE, Sullivan-Bolyai S, Reid-Ponte P. Making a connection: family experiences with bedside rounds in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Nurse 2018;38 (3):18–26.
Au SS, Roze des Ordons AL, Parsons Leigh J, Soo A, Guienguere S, Bagshaw SM, et al. A multicenter observational study of family participation in ICU rounds. Crit Care Med 2018;46 (8):1255–1262.
Stickney CA, Ziniel SI, Brett MS, Truog RD. Family participation during intensive care unit rounds: attitudes and experiences of parents and healthcare providers in a tertiary pediatric intensive care unit. J Pediatr 2014;164 (2):402–6.e1-4.
Davidson JE, Savidan KA, Barker N, Ekno M, Warmuth D, Degen-De Cort A. Using Evidence to overcome obstacles to family presence. Crit Care Nurs Q 2014;37 (4):407–421.
Santiago C, Lazar L, Jiang D, Burns KE. A survey of the attitudes and perceptions of multidisciplinary team members towards family presence at bedside rounds in the intensive care unit. Intensive Critical Care Nurs 2013;30 (1):13–21.
Davidson JE. Family presence on rounds in neonatal, pediatric, and adult intensive care units. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2013;10 (2):152–156.
Lopez M, Vaks Y, Wilson M, Mitchell K, Lee C, Ejike J, et al. Impacting satisfaction, learning, and efficiency through structured interdisciplinary rounding in a pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Qual Saf 2019;4 (3):e176.
Barnes S, Rio L, de Goumoëns V, Grandjean C, Ramelet A-S. Effectiveness and family experiences of interventions promoting partnerships between families and pediatric and neonatal intensive care units: a mixed methods systematic review protocol. JBI Evid Synth 2020;18 (6):1292–1298.
McAndrew NS, Jerofke-Owen T, Fortney CA, Costa DK, Hetland B, Guttormson J, et al. Systematic review of family engagement interventions in neonatal, paediatric, and adult ICUs. Nurs Crit Care 2020; Online ahead of print.
Cypress BS. Family presence on rounds: a systematic review of literature. Dimens Crit Care Nurs 2012;31 (1):53–64.
McCloskey RM, Furlong KE, Hansen L. Patient, family and nurse experiences with patient presence during handovers in acute care hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. JBI Evid Synth 2019;17 (5):754–792.
Morley RF, Norman G, Golder S, Griffith P. A systematic scoping review of the evidence for consumer involvement in organisations undertaking systematic reviews: focus on Cochrane. Res Involv Engagem 2016;2 (1):36.
Marshall JC, Bosco L, Adhikari NK, Connolly B, Diaz JV, Dorman T, et al. What is an intensive care unit? A report of the task force of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine. J Crit Care 2017; (37):270–276.
Lockwood C, Porrit K, Munn Z, Rittenmeyer L, Salmond S, Bjerrum M, et al. Chapter 2: Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis [internet]. Adelaide: JBI; 2020 [cited 2021 Dec 23]. Available from: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global .
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLoS Med 2021;18 (3):e1003583.
Munn Z, Porritt K, Lockwood C, Aromataris E, Pearson A. Establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research synthesis: the ConQual approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014;14 (1):1.