Phonological similarity in the serial recall task hinders item recall, not just order.
phonological similarity
serial recall
short-term memory
Journal
British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)
ISSN: 2044-8295
Titre abrégé: Br J Psychol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0373124
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2022
Nov 2022
Historique:
revised:
16
04
2022
received:
18
11
2021
accepted:
17
05
2022
pubmed:
14
6
2022
medline:
13
10
2022
entrez:
13
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The phonological similarity effect in short-term memory (STM) is the finding that serial recall of lists of similar sounding items is poorer than that of dissimilar sounding items. This is traditionally argued to be due to a detrimental effect on memory for the order of the words in the list and not on memory for the words themselves. Models that propose forgetting from STM is due to interference must invoke an additional compensatory process where the shared element of the words acts as a cue to recall, in order to account for the lack of an effect on memory for the words. However, the possibility of a detrimental effect of phonological similarity on item memory when these compensatory processes are not available has not been investigated. Two experiments (n = 60 and n = 57) in which similarity is operationalized in a way that precludes usage of compensatory processes are reported. The results clearly demonstrate that item recall is poorer for similar lists than dissimilar lists when similarity is defined in this way.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35692188
doi: 10.1111/bjop.12575
pmc: PMC9796538
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1100-1120Subventions
Organisme : Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
ID : RGPIN-2015-04416
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The British Psychological Society.
Références
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60
pubmed: 19897823
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):977-90
pubmed: 19897807
Br J Psychol. 1964 Nov;55:429-32
pubmed: 14237884
Mem Cognit. 1993 Mar;21(2):168-75
pubmed: 8469125
Am J Psychol. 1965 Dec;78(4):567-74
pubmed: 5839924
Q J Exp Psychol. 1966 Nov;18(4):302-9
pubmed: 5956072
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Nov;29(6):1353-80
pubmed: 14622066
Mem Cognit. 1993 Jul;21(4):539-45
pubmed: 8350745
Psychol Bull. 2018 Sep;144(9):885-958
pubmed: 30148379
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Dec;44(4):978-90
pubmed: 22581493
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Aug;44(8):1312-1316
pubmed: 29648863
Br J Psychol. 2022 Nov;113(4):1100-1120
pubmed: 35692188
Mem Cognit. 2005 Sep;33(6):1001-16
pubmed: 16496721
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Oct;15(5):971-9
pubmed: 18926991
Can J Exp Psychol. 1996 Dec;50(4):408-12
pubmed: 9025332
Psychol Rev. 2008 Jul;115(3):544-76
pubmed: 18729591
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Sep;46(3):904-11
pubmed: 24142837
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Jun;10(2):430-4
pubmed: 12921420