Very High Negative Concordance Rate of RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 in Nasopharyngeal Swab and Tracheo-Bronchial Aspirate in Children.
RT-PCR-Real-Time PCR
SARS-CoV-2
children
naso-pharyngeal swab
tracheo-bronchial aspirate
Journal
Frontiers in pediatrics
ISSN: 2296-2360
Titre abrégé: Front Pediatr
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101615492
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
30
01
2022
accepted:
11
04
2022
entrez:
13
6
2022
pubmed:
14
6
2022
medline:
14
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Reliable testing methods for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in children are essential to allow normal activities. Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is currently based on real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) performed on nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs; concerns have been raised regarding NP swab accuracy in children to detect the virus because of potential lack of cooperation of the patients or due to general uncertainties about concordance between high and low respiratory tract specimens in children. The aim of the study (IRB approval: ST/2020/405) is to prospectively compare RT-PCR results on NP and tracheo-bronchial aspirate (TA) in children admitted to the hospital for surgery or admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) of a tertiary children hospital in Milano, Italy, during a peak of COVID-19 infections in the city. A total of 385 patients were enrolled in the study: 364 from surgical theater and 21 from PICU. Two patients (0.5%) tested positive on TA and were negative on NP; both cases occurred in November 2020, during a peak of infection in the city. Specificity of NP swab was.995 (95% CI: 0.980-0.999). Two patients with positive NP swabs tested negative on TA. Our study shows that the specificity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR on TA swab, compared to results of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR on NP, was very high for negative cases in our pediatric cohort during a period of high epidemiological pressure.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35692973
doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.866111
pmc: PMC9174601
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
866111Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Camporesi, De Silvestri, Diotto, Ferrario, Eccher, De Ferrari, Messina, Pelizzo, Mileto, Calcaterra and Buonsenso.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Rhinology. 2021 Oct 1;59(5):410-421
pubmed: 34666340
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Apr;279(4):2193-2196
pubmed: 34853865
J Clin Virol. 2013 Dec;58(4):683-8
pubmed: 24125830
J Glob Health. 2020 Dec;10(2):021101
pubmed: 33312511
J Paediatr Child Health. 2021 Jul;57(7):1078-1081
pubmed: 33605504
J Med Virol. 2021 Feb;93(2):719-725
pubmed: 32706393
Am J Infect Control. 2021 Jan;49(1):21-29
pubmed: 32659413
J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 15;10(2):
pubmed: 33467628
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2021 Jul 27;6(4):646-649
pubmed: 34401485
EBioMedicine. 2020 Sep;59:102903
pubmed: 32718896
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2020 Sep;39(9):e288-e289
pubmed: 32740453
Nature. 2022 Feb;602(7896):321-327
pubmed: 34937051