What controls the observed size-dependency of the growth rates of sub-10 nm atmospheric particles?


Journal

Environmental science: atmospheres
ISSN: 2634-3606
Titre abrégé: Environ Sci Atmos
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918227365506676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 May 2022
Historique:
received: 17 12 2021
accepted: 12 03 2022
entrez: 13 6 2022
pubmed: 14 6 2022
medline: 14 6 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The formation and growth of atmospheric particles involving sulfuric acid and organic vapors is estimated to have significant climate effects. To accurately represent this process in large-scale models, the correct interpretation of the observations on particle growth, especially below 10 nm, is essential. Here, we disentangle the factors governing the growth of sub-10 nm particles in the presence of sulfuric acid and organic vapors, using molecular-resolution cluster population simulations and chamber experiments. We find that observed particle growth rates are determined by the combined effects of (1) the concentrations and evaporation rates of the condensing vapors, (2) particle population dynamics, and (3) stochastic fluctuations, characteristic to initial nucleation. This leads to a different size-dependency of growth rate in the presence of sulfuric acid and/or organic vapors at different concentrations. Specifically, the activation type behavior, resulting in growth rate increasing with the particle size, is observed only at certain vapor concentrations. In our model simulations, cluster-cluster collisions enhance growth rate at high vapor concentrations and their importance is dictated by the cluster evaporation rates, which demonstrates the need for accurate evaporation rate data. Finally, we show that at sizes below ∼2.5-3.5 nm, stochastic effects can importantly contribute to particle population growth. Overall, our results suggest that interpreting particle growth observations with approaches neglecting population dynamics and stochastics, such as with single particle growth models, can lead to the wrong conclusions on the properties of condensing vapors and particle growth mechanisms.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35694135
doi: 10.1039/d1ea00103e
pii: d1ea00103e
pmc: PMC9119032
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

449-468

Informations de copyright

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Références

J Chem Phys. 2013 Aug 28;139(8):084312
pubmed: 24007002
Nat Commun. 2019 Sep 30;10(1):4442
pubmed: 31570718
J Phys Chem A. 2012 Jun 21;116(24):6375-86
pubmed: 22364556
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Apr 17;46(8):4365-73
pubmed: 22435616
Science. 2016 Dec 2;354(6316):1119-1124
pubmed: 27789796
Nature. 2014 Feb 27;506(7489):476-9
pubmed: 24572423
Nat Protoc. 2012 Sep;7(9):1651-67
pubmed: 22899333
J Phys Chem A. 2016 Mar 24;120(11):1886-96
pubmed: 26918813
Sci Adv. 2020 May 27;6(22):eaay4945
pubmed: 32518819
Nature. 2016 May 25;533(7604):521-6
pubmed: 27225125
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Oct 22;110(43):17223-8
pubmed: 24101502
Sci Adv. 2018 Dec 12;4(12):eaau5363
pubmed: 30547087
J Phys Chem A. 2020 Jul 16;124(28):5931-5943
pubmed: 32568535
Nature. 2016 May 25;533(7604):527-31
pubmed: 27225126
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Oct 21;111(42):15019-24
pubmed: 25288761
Nat Protoc. 2020 Mar;15(3):1013-1040
pubmed: 32051616
J Chem Phys. 2009 Jan 7;130(1):014102
pubmed: 19140607
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 11;115(37):9122-9127
pubmed: 30154167
Environ Sci Atmos. 2022 Mar 23;2(3):449-468
pubmed: 35694135
Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2014;65:21-37
pubmed: 24245904
J Phys Chem A. 2015 Jun 18;119(24):6339-45
pubmed: 26023711
Chem Soc Rev. 2012 Aug 7;41(15):5160-73
pubmed: 22710807
Nature. 2011 Aug 24;476(7361):429-33
pubmed: 21866156
J Phys Chem A. 2021 Feb 4;125(4):895-902
pubmed: 33378191
Nature. 2019 Jan;565(7741):587-593
pubmed: 30700872
Chem Rev. 2012 Mar 14;112(3):1957-2011
pubmed: 22044487
Science. 2013 Feb 22;339(6122):943-6
pubmed: 23430652
Nat Commun. 2016 May 20;7:11594
pubmed: 27197574
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 21;8(1):14160
pubmed: 30242199

Auteurs

Jenni Kontkanen (J)

Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research, University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland jenni.kontkanen@helsinki.fi.

Dominik Stolzenburg (D)

Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research, University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland jenni.kontkanen@helsinki.fi.

Tinja Olenius (T)

Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute Norrköping Sweden.

Chao Yan (C)

Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research, University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland jenni.kontkanen@helsinki.fi.

Lubna Dada (L)

Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research, University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland jenni.kontkanen@helsinki.fi.
Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute Villigen Switzerland.

Lauri Ahonen (L)

Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research, University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland jenni.kontkanen@helsinki.fi.

Mario Simon (M)

Institute for Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt Frankfurt am Main Germany.

Katrianne Lehtipalo (K)

Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research, University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland jenni.kontkanen@helsinki.fi.
Finnish Meteorological Institute Helsinki Finland.

Ilona Riipinen (I)

Department of Environmental Science (ACES), Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden.

Classifications MeSH