Do book consumers discriminate against Black, female, or young authors?


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 08 11 2021
accepted: 07 04 2022
entrez: 13 6 2022
pubmed: 14 6 2022
medline: 16 6 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The publishing industry shows marked evidence of both gender and racial discrimination. A rational explanation for this difference in treatment of both female and Black authors might relate to the taste-based preferences of book consumers, who might be less willing to pay for books by such authors. We ran a randomized experiment to test for the presence of discriminatory preferences by consumers based on authors' race, gender and/or age. We collected ratings of 25,201 book surveys across 9,072 subjects on Amazon's Mechanical Turk, making this study the largest experimental study of the book market to date. Subjects were presented with mocked-up book covers and descriptions from each of 14 fiction and non-fiction genres, with one of three possible titles per book randomly assigned. Using author names and photographs, we signaled authors' race, gender, and age and randomly assigned these combinations to each book presented to our subjects. We then asked subjects to rate their interest in purchasing the book, their evaluation of the author's credentials, and the amount they were willing to pay for the book. The experimental design of this study strived to eliminate the potential for proxy-based discrimination by providing book descriptions that detailed the authors' relevant professional experience. The large sample allowed for exploration of various types of taste-based discrimination observed in the literature, including discrimination against particular groups, homophily, and pro-social behavior. Overall, book consumers showed a willingness to pay approximately $0.50 or 3.5% more on average for books by Black authors and little, if any, practically meaningful discrimination based on age or gender. In other words, our study finds no and even contrary evidence of taste-based preferences by consumers that would rationalize the historic discriminatory treatment of Black or of female authors by publishers nor of discrimination based on an author's age.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35696383
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267537
pii: PONE-D-21-35608
pmc: PMC9191698
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0267537

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Psychol Bull. 1993 Jan;113(1):140-63
pubmed: 8426873
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 9;109(41):16474-9
pubmed: 22988126
J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Winter;23(4):539-43
pubmed: 16795738
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 9;13(4):e0195298
pubmed: 29630619
Soc Sci Res. 2015 Nov;54:195-208
pubmed: 26463543
Annu Rev Psychol. 1999;50:537-67
pubmed: 15012463
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 21;9:998
pubmed: 29977213
Sci Adv. 2016 Feb 19;2(2):e1500599
pubmed: 26989770

Auteurs

Dana B Weinberg (DB)

Department of Sociology, Queens College, CUNY, Queens, NY, United States of America.

Adam Kapelner (A)

Department of Mathematics, Queens College, CUNY, Queens, NY, United States of America.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH