Estimating the global demand curve for a leishmaniasis vaccine: A generalisable approach based on global burden of disease estimates.
Journal
PLoS neglected tropical diseases
ISSN: 1935-2735
Titre abrégé: PLoS Negl Trop Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101291488
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2022
06 2022
Historique:
received:
29
08
2021
accepted:
05
05
2022
revised:
24
06
2022
pubmed:
14
6
2022
medline:
29
6
2022
entrez:
13
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A pressing need exists to develop vaccines for neglected diseases, including leishmaniasis. However, the development of new vaccines is dependent on their value to two key players-vaccine developers and manufacturers who need to have confidence in the global demand in order to commit to research and production; and governments (or other international funders) who need to signal demand based on the potential public health benefits of the vaccine in their local context, as well as its affordability. A detailed global epidemiological analysis is rarely available before a vaccine enters a market due to lack of resources as well as insufficient global data necessary for such an analysis. Our study seeks to bridge this information gap by providing a generalisable approach to estimating the commercial and public health value of a vaccine in development relying primarily on publicly available Global Burden of Disease (GBD) data. This simplified approach is easily replicable and can be used to guide discussions and investments into vaccines and other health technologies where evidence constraints exist. The approach is demonstrated through the estimation of the demand curve for a future leishmaniasis vaccine. We project the ability to pay over the period 2030-2040 for a vaccine preventing cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis (CL / VL), using an illustrative set of countries which account for most of the global disease burden. First, based on previous work on vaccine demand projections in these countries and CL / VL GBD-reported incidence rates, we project the potential long-term impact of the vaccine on disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted as a result of reduced incidence. Then, we apply an economic framework to our estimates to determine vaccine affordability based on the abilities to pay of governments and global funders, leading to estimates of the demand and market size. Based on our estimates, the maximum ability-to-pay of a leishmaniasis vaccine (per course, including delivery costs), given the current estimates of incidence and population at risk, is higher than $5 for 25-30% of the countries considered, with the average value-based maximum price, weighted by quantity demanded, being $5.7-6 [$0.3 - $34.5], and total demand of over 560 million courses. Our results demonstrate that both the quantity of vaccines estimated to be required by the countries considered as well as their ability-to-pay could make a vaccine for leishmaniasis commercially attractive to potential manufacturers. The methodology used can be equally applied to other technology developments targeting health in developing countries.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
A pressing need exists to develop vaccines for neglected diseases, including leishmaniasis. However, the development of new vaccines is dependent on their value to two key players-vaccine developers and manufacturers who need to have confidence in the global demand in order to commit to research and production; and governments (or other international funders) who need to signal demand based on the potential public health benefits of the vaccine in their local context, as well as its affordability. A detailed global epidemiological analysis is rarely available before a vaccine enters a market due to lack of resources as well as insufficient global data necessary for such an analysis. Our study seeks to bridge this information gap by providing a generalisable approach to estimating the commercial and public health value of a vaccine in development relying primarily on publicly available Global Burden of Disease (GBD) data. This simplified approach is easily replicable and can be used to guide discussions and investments into vaccines and other health technologies where evidence constraints exist. The approach is demonstrated through the estimation of the demand curve for a future leishmaniasis vaccine.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
We project the ability to pay over the period 2030-2040 for a vaccine preventing cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis (CL / VL), using an illustrative set of countries which account for most of the global disease burden. First, based on previous work on vaccine demand projections in these countries and CL / VL GBD-reported incidence rates, we project the potential long-term impact of the vaccine on disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted as a result of reduced incidence. Then, we apply an economic framework to our estimates to determine vaccine affordability based on the abilities to pay of governments and global funders, leading to estimates of the demand and market size. Based on our estimates, the maximum ability-to-pay of a leishmaniasis vaccine (per course, including delivery costs), given the current estimates of incidence and population at risk, is higher than $5 for 25-30% of the countries considered, with the average value-based maximum price, weighted by quantity demanded, being $5.7-6 [$0.3 - $34.5], and total demand of over 560 million courses.
CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE
Our results demonstrate that both the quantity of vaccines estimated to be required by the countries considered as well as their ability-to-pay could make a vaccine for leishmaniasis commercially attractive to potential manufacturers. The methodology used can be equally applied to other technology developments targeting health in developing countries.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35696433
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010471
pii: PNTD-D-21-01285
pmc: PMC9232160
doi:
Substances chimiques
Leishmaniasis Vaccines
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0010471Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/P028004/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 108518
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 104726
Pays : United Kingdom
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: PK is co-author of a patent protecting the gene insert used in Leishmania candidate vaccine ChAd63-KH (Europe 10719953.1; India 315101).
Références
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Nov 6;13(11):e0007788
pubmed: 31693661
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Sep 21;15(9):e0009742
pubmed: 34547025
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Dec;7(12):e1664-e1674
pubmed: 31708147
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Sep;38(9):995-1005
pubmed: 32596785
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2016 Jul;26(4):381-8
pubmed: 27587936
Lancet. 2020 5-11 Sep;396(10252):693-724
pubmed: 32334655
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008;2(10):e313
pubmed: 18958165
Trends Parasitol. 2014 Feb;30(2):65-74
pubmed: 24388776
Trop Med Int Health. 2012 May;17(5):666-73
pubmed: 22385129
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011 Oct;17(10):1471-7
pubmed: 21933305
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Jan;82(1):9-11
pubmed: 20064987
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Nov 5;3(6):e000964
pubmed: 30483412
Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 10;11(1):3461
pubmed: 32651371
J Biomed Res. 2013 Mar;27(2):85-102
pubmed: 23554800
Health Policy Plan. 2022 Jan 13;37(1):45-54
pubmed: 34410385
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2016 Jul 29;3(3):ofw161
pubmed: 27704016
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Aug 10;11(8):e0005739
pubmed: 28796782
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10):
pubmed: 33082132
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 Mar;86(3):417-25
pubmed: 22403311
Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2016 Oct;9(10):925-932
pubmed: 27794384
J Infect Dis. 2015 Aug 15;212(4):570-7
pubmed: 25767214
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Aug;21(4):729-736
pubmed: 32954900
Elife. 2014 Jun 27;3:
pubmed: 24972829
Trop Med Int Health. 2017 Dec;22(12):1579-1589
pubmed: 29078015
Vaccine. 2016 Jun 3;34(26):2992-2995
pubmed: 26973063
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(10):2235-2242
pubmed: 31180271
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1160-1203
pubmed: 33069325
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e35671
pubmed: 22693548
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Feb 25;13(2):e0007092
pubmed: 30802261
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Apr 20;11(4):e0005529
pubmed: 28426716
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2006 May-Jun;48(3):151-6
pubmed: 16847505