A Retrospective Analysis of the Impact of HIV Infection on Outcomes of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancers Treated With Either Conventional or Hypofractionated Radiotherapy: The Uganda Experience.
Journal
JCO global oncology
ISSN: 2687-8941
Titre abrégé: JCO Glob Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101760170
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2022
06 2022
Historique:
entrez:
13
6
2022
pubmed:
14
6
2022
medline:
16
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We annually treat more than 800 new patients with cervical cancer, where the majority (approximately 60%) have locally advanced disease and approximately 40% of them are infected with HIV. To optimally care for this large number of patients in low-income settings is difficult. From July 2011, we started using 45.0 Gy/15# hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) as a substitute to 50.0 Gy/25# conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT), for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). This study aims at comparing the 5-year treatment outcomes between patients with LACC, known HIV serostatus, and treated with either CFRT or HFRT. A retrospective study was conducted according to demographic/clinical data, radiotherapy fractionations, and outcomes. Factors considered were FIGO stages IIB-IIIB, known HIV serostatus, and had completed external-beam radiotherapy and intracavitary brachytherapy. The primary end point was overall survival; the secondary end points were toxicity and compliance. The study included 221 patients. Squamous cell carcinomas were 95.1% and adenocarcinomas 2.3%. The median age was 45.0 (interquartile range, 38.0-52.0) years. Stages IIB, IIIA, and IIIB were 38.9%, 6.3%, and 54.8%, respectively. HIV-positive and HIV-negative were 87 (39.4%) and 134 (60.6%), respectively. Chemoradiation was administered in 100 (45.2%), and 52 (52.0%) completed chemotherapy. CFRT/HFRT were 116 (52.5%)/105 (47.5%). At 24 months, the overall response was 54.1% for HIV-negative compared with 45.0% for HIV-positive ( For the treatment of LACC with known HIV serology, there was no significant statistical difference in terms of response, toxicity, and compliance between CFRT and HFRT. However, the difference in overall survival between HIV-negative and HIV-positive was significant.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35696625
doi: 10.1200/GO.21.00360
pmc: PMC9225504
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2100360Références
JCO Glob Oncol. 2021 Jun;7:843-848
pubmed: 34101485
Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Apr;97(1):126-35
pubmed: 15790448
Lancet. 2007 Jul 7;370(9581):59-67
pubmed: 17617273
Curr Opin Oncol. 2010 Sep;22(5):449-55
pubmed: 20613518
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jul 1;25(19):2804-10
pubmed: 17502627
Br J Radiol. 2010 Jul;83(991):554-68
pubmed: 20603408
Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 1997 Mar 21;72(12):81-7
pubmed: 9238418
J Glob Oncol. 2016 Jun 1;3(1):72-78
pubmed: 28717744
Int J Radiat Biol. 1990 Jan;57(1):127-42
pubmed: 1967284
Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2017 Jan;12(1):26-30
pubmed: 27828801
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Mar 30;31(5):1341-6
pubmed: 7713792
Front Oncol. 2020 Dec 08;10:595351
pubmed: 33364195
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Nov 1;34(31):3749-3757
pubmed: 27573661
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Apr;153(1):20-25
pubmed: 30773222
Radiat Oncol. 2012 Mar 15;7:33
pubmed: 22420631
Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Feb;100(2):405-11
pubmed: 16274737
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2008 Jun;20(5):358-64
pubmed: 18395427
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249
pubmed: 33538338
Br J Radiol. 2012 Sep;85(1017):e770-81
pubmed: 22919020
Cancer. 2012 Jan 1;118(1):147-56
pubmed: 21713764
BMC Womens Health. 2006 Feb 07;6:3
pubmed: 16464243
Ann Oncol. 2010 May;21 Suppl 5:v37-40
pubmed: 20555099
Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 10;9(1):79
pubmed: 32276672
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2001 Jan-Feb;11(1):78-80
pubmed: 11285038
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2017 Jul 21;21:101-108
pubmed: 28819634
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1996;(21):89-92
pubmed: 9023835
CA Cancer J Clin. 2003 Jan-Feb;53(1):27-43
pubmed: 12568442
Cancer Med. 2015 Sep;4(9):1381-93
pubmed: 26136407
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Nov 1;87(3):542-8
pubmed: 24074927