Standardisation of ACPA tests: evaluation of a new candidate reference preparation.
NIBSC
anti-citrullinated protein antibody
reference material
standardization
Journal
Annals of the rheumatic diseases
ISSN: 1468-2060
Titre abrégé: Ann Rheum Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372355
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Jun 2022
13 Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
13
11
2021
accepted:
19
05
2022
entrez:
13
6
2022
pubmed:
14
6
2022
medline:
14
6
2022
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Commercial assays measuring antibodies to citrullinated protein/peptide (ACPA) show poor quantitative agreement. The diagnostic industry has never adopted the International Union of Immunological Societies-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (IUIS-CDC) ACPA reference standard. Recently, the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) prepared a new candidate ACPA standard (18/204). We evaluated both reference materials using different commercially available ACPA assays. This is an international study in which the NIBSC candidate ACPA standard and the IUIS-CDC ACPA reference material were analysed together with 398 diagnostic samples from individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and in 1073 individuals who did not have RA using nine commercial ACPA assays. For both reference materials and samples from individuals with RA and individuals who did not have RA, there were large differences in quantitative ACPA results between assays. For most assays, values for the IUIS-CDC standard were lower than values for NIBSC 18/204 and the IUIS-CDC/NIBSC ratio was comparable for several, but not all assays. When NIBSC 18/204 was used as a calibrator, an improvement in alignment of ACPA results across several of the evaluated assays was obtained. Moreover, NIBSC 18/204 could align clinical interpretation for some but not all assays. Adoption of an international standard for ACPA determination is highly desirable. The candidate NIBSC 18/204 standard improved the standardisation and alignment of most ACPA assays and might therefore be recommended to be used as reference in commercial assays.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35697487
pii: annrheumdis-2021-221849
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-221849
pmc: PMC9484372
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: XB, LVH, GS and DS have received speaker fees from Thermo Fisher Scientific and have been a consultant for Thermo Fisher Scientific; BL and IH has received speaker fees from Thermo Fisher Scientific. All participating diagnostic companies in-kind provided the ACPA assays and provided technical training and support:Thermo Fisher Scientific, Uppsala, Sweden; Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany; Svar Life Science, Malmö, Sweden; Immunodiagnostic Systems (IDS), Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom; Orgentec, Mainz, Germany; Abbott, Wiesbaden, Germany; Euroimmun, Lübeck, Germany; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, California, USA; and Siemens Healthineers, Sudbury, United Kingdom.
Références
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018 Sep 25;56(10):1734-1742
pubmed: 29626412
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Sep;76(9):e33
pubmed: 28119288
RMD Open. 2022 Mar;8(1):
pubmed: 35321875
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2014 Jan;10(1):35-43
pubmed: 24275965
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 May;77(5):667-677
pubmed: 29363510
Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Aug;71(8):1388-92
pubmed: 22492784
Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Aug;69(8):1554-61
pubmed: 20448290
J Transl Autoimmun. 2022 Jan 06;5:100142
pubmed: 35036891
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Oct 16;59(2):e35-e39
pubmed: 33027040
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Feb;68(2):287-9
pubmed: 19139208
Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Sep;69(9):1580-8
pubmed: 20699241
Clin Immunol. 2018 Jan;186:59-62
pubmed: 28736274
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018 Sep 25;56(10):1563-1567
pubmed: 30120908
Clin Chem. 2007 Mar;53(3):498-504
pubmed: 17259232
Front Immunol. 2021 May 14;12:685312
pubmed: 34054878