High efficiency of homemade culture medium supplemented with GDF9-β in human oocytes for rescue in vitro maturation.

Fertilization Growth differentiation factor 9 In vitro oocyte maturation techniques Spindle apparatus

Journal

Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine
ISSN: 2233-8233
Titre abrégé: Clin Exp Reprod Med
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101563916

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Historique:
received: 18 10 2021
accepted: 07 03 2022
entrez: 14 6 2022
pubmed: 15 6 2022
medline: 15 6 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Optimizing culture media for the incubation of immature oocytes is a vital strategy to increase the oocyte maturation rate during in vitro maturation (IVM) programs. This study evaluated the IVM and fertilization rates of human germinal vesicle (GV) and metaphase I (MI) oocytes using two different maturation media (commercial and homemade) with or without growth differentiation factor 9-β (GDF9-β). supplementation. Immature oocytes from intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles were collected and assigned to one of two IVM culture media (commercial or homemade; cleavage-stage base). After maturation, MII oocytes were examined under an inverted microscope for the presence of the polar body, zona pellucida (ZP) birefringence, and meiotic spindle (MS) visualization after maturation in four conditions (commercial or homemade medium, with or without GDF9-β. ICSI was done for matured oocytes, and fertilization was confirmed by the visualization of two distinct pronuclei and two polar bodies. No significant differences were found between the two culture media in terms of the time and rate of oocyte maturation or the rate of fertilization (p>0.05). Growth factor supplementation increased the 24-hour maturation rate for both GV and MI oocytes only in homemade medium. The maturation rate after 24 hours was higher for MI oocytes (p<0.05). Similar results were observed for MS visualization and ZP structure in both types of media (p>0.05). Higher rates of oocyte maturation and fertilization were observed after application of homemade medium supplemented with GDF9-β. Therefore, this combination may be recommended as an alternative for clinical IVM programs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35698778
pii: cerm.2021.05050
doi: 10.5653/cerm.2021.05050
pmc: PMC9184876
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

149-158

Références

Theriogenology. 1999 Oct 1;52(5):847-61
pubmed: 10735125
Fertil Steril. 2000 Dec;74(6):1153-8
pubmed: 11119743
Reprod Biomed Online. 2008 Feb;16(2):250-6
pubmed: 18284882
Hum Reprod. 2005 Nov;20(11):3204-7
pubmed: 16037117
Fertil Steril. 2006 Apr;85(4):827-32
pubmed: 16580356
Reproduction. 2013 May 21;145(6):555-65
pubmed: 23564726
Dev Biol. 2006 Aug 15;296(2):514-21
pubmed: 16854407
Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2019 Dec;46(4):166-172
pubmed: 31813208
Fertil Steril. 2011 Feb;95(2):554-7
pubmed: 21094941
Reprod Sci. 2020 Jun;27(6):1223-1252
pubmed: 32046451
Fertil Steril. 2008 Aug;90(2):429-33
pubmed: 17953959
Biochem Soc Trans. 2018 Aug 20;46(4):797-806
pubmed: 29934303
Reprod Sci. 2021 Jun 2;:
pubmed: 34076873
Endocrine. 2016 Apr;52(1):165-71
pubmed: 26419849
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Aug;292(2):459-63
pubmed: 25672909
Hum Reprod. 1997 May;12(5):1056-8
pubmed: 9194665
Int J Mol Cell Med. 2013 Summer;2(3):99-109
pubmed: 24551799
Fertil Steril. 2006 Nov;86(5):1277-91
pubmed: 16996508
Fertil Steril. 2002 Nov;78(5):1077-81
pubmed: 12413997
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2020 Apr-Jun;13(2):133-137
pubmed: 32792762
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Jun;38(6):1331-1340
pubmed: 33619680
Hum Reprod. 2008 Jan;23(1):67-73
pubmed: 17933754
J Assist Reprod Genet. 1999 Oct;16(9):483-7
pubmed: 10530402
Fertil Steril. 2009 Feb;91(2):509-13
pubmed: 18304540
Biol Cell. 2009 Feb;101(2):69-76
pubmed: 19076067
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010 Jul;27(7):347-56
pubmed: 20425141
Fertil Steril. 2011 Jun 30;95(8):2645-7
pubmed: 21561612
Reprod Fertil Dev. 2014 Mar;26(3):407-13
pubmed: 23544843
Hum Reprod. 2001 Jul;16(7):1464-8
pubmed: 11425830
Zygote. 2018 Oct;26(5):430-434
pubmed: 30419976
Hum Reprod. 2008 Feb;23(2):394-402
pubmed: 18033806
Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2017 Jun;44(2):79-84
pubmed: 28795046
Hum Reprod. 2016 Jul;31(7):1383-6
pubmed: 27165616
Lancet. 1965 Nov 6;2(7419):926-9
pubmed: 4165802
Arch Androl. 2000 May-Jun;44(3):197-205
pubmed: 10864367
Reprod Domest Anim. 2014 Apr;49(2):219-27
pubmed: 24313324
Reprod Biomed Online. 2007 Feb;14(2):166-74
pubmed: 17298718
Reprod Domest Anim. 2019 Apr;54(4):719-726
pubmed: 30786066
Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Feb;10(2):192-8
pubmed: 15823222
Hum Reprod. 1998 Apr;13(4):1014-9
pubmed: 9619563
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Jun;38(6):1265-1280
pubmed: 34218388
Biol Reprod. 2005 Oct;73(4):582-5
pubmed: 15917343

Auteurs

Mehdi Mohsenzadeh (M)

Gerash Al-Zahra Fertility Center, Gerash University of Medical Sciences, Gerash, Iran.

Mohammad Ali Khalili (MA)

Research and Clinical Center for Infertility, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.

Fatemeh Anbari (F)

Research and Clinical Center for Infertility, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.

Mahboubeh Vatanparast (M)

Molecular Medicine Research Center, Research Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.

Classifications MeSH