Open science and public trust in science: Results from two studies.

epistemic trust experimental study open science practices science communication survey study trust in science

Journal

Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)
ISSN: 1361-6609
Titre abrégé: Public Underst Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9306503

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 15 6 2022
medline: 4 11 2022
entrez: 14 6 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In two studies, we examined whether open science practices, such as making materials, data, and code of a study openly accessible, positively affect public trust in science. Furthermore, we investigated whether the potential trust-damaging effects of research being funded privately (e.g. by a commercial enterprise) may be buffered by such practices. After preregistering six hypotheses, we conducted a survey study (Study 1;

Identifiants

pubmed: 35699352
doi: 10.1177/09636625221100686
pmc: PMC9630960
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1046-1062

Références

Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60
pubmed: 19897823
Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716
pubmed: 26315443
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Apr 1;7(4):181351
pubmed: 32431853
Public Underst Sci. 2008 Jul;17(3):309-27
pubmed: 19069082
Public Underst Sci. 2021 Aug;30(6):644-670
pubmed: 34006153
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 25;7:1832
pubmed: 27933012
Ecancermedicalscience. 2016 Jun 07;10:ed56
pubmed: 27350794
BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 8;21(1):684
pubmed: 33832446
Multivariate Behav Res. 2009 Jul 1;43(3):476-496
pubmed: 19924269
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 1998;2(3):196-217
pubmed: 15647155
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Jul;13(4):411-417
pubmed: 29961410
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110 Suppl 3:14081-7
pubmed: 23940350
Public Underst Sci. 2020 Apr;29(3):270-288
pubmed: 32036741
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Sep;24(9):467-71
pubmed: 19586682
PLoS Biol. 2018 Nov 20;16(11):e2006930
pubmed: 30457984
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 24;12:683987
pubmed: 34248786
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Jan 10;1:0021
pubmed: 33954258
Public Underst Sci. 2022 Nov;31(8):1046-1062
pubmed: 35699352
Public Underst Sci. 2021 Jan;30(1):91-102
pubmed: 32924865
Nature. 2016 Jan 28;529(7587):459-61
pubmed: 26819029
Psychol Sci. 2022 Sep;33(9):1588-1604
pubmed: 36001881

Auteurs

Michael Bosnjak (M)

Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID), Germany.

Henning Silber (H)

GESIS - Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany.

Joanna Koßmann (J)

Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID), Germany.

Tobias Heycke (T)

GESIS - Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH