Objective measurement of sitting - Application in children with cerebral palsy.
Cerebral palsy
Intrathecal baclofen
Motion analysis
Pressure mapping
Sitting
Journal
Gait & posture
ISSN: 1879-2219
Titre abrégé: Gait Posture
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9416830
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2022
07 2022
Historique:
received:
31
08
2021
revised:
27
04
2022
accepted:
31
05
2022
pubmed:
15
6
2022
medline:
3
8
2022
entrez:
14
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Children with cerebral palsy (CP) and a severe motor impairment, have limited ability to perform volitional movements due to spasticity, involuntary postures and movements and reduced ability to maintain antigravity head and trunk control. A stable sitting position is a prerequisite for participation in daily life, but there is a lack of objective measurement methods for this population. Is it feasible to measure a stable sitting position with pressure mapping and 2D motion analysis, and can it detect differences to a) a reference group, b) between subgroups of CP and c) before and after treatment with intrathecal baclofen (ITB)? Pressure mapping, and a 2D motion analysis system, were used to capture movements of centre of pressure (CoP), and movements of head, hand and leg, sitting on a bench for 90 s. Twenty-two children with dyskinetic or bilateral spastic CP, GMFCS III-V, mean age 9.0, and 30 children with typical development (TD) mean age 10.7, were recruited between 2010 and 2019. Seventeen children were treated with ITB. Parents were interviewed regarding aspect of sitting. Non-parametric methods were used for statistical analysis. Differences in CoP and kinematics were detected with more movements in children with CP compared to children with TD (p < 0.001). There were more movements in children with dyskinetic CP compared to children with bilateral spastic CP as captured with the pressure mapping system (CoP distance p = .005 and Anterio-Posterior sway p = .014). After treatment with ITB, involuntary movements had decreased (CoP p = 0.006-0.035, kinematics p = 0.002-0.020). Parents reported improvement in sitting. The two measurement systems showed consistent results (rho 0.500-0.771, p = <0.001-0.049). It was feasible to objectively measure sitting position in children with a moderate-to-severe motor impairment with differences to a reference group and after an intervention. CoP and head movements were the variables that were easiest to capture.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Children with cerebral palsy (CP) and a severe motor impairment, have limited ability to perform volitional movements due to spasticity, involuntary postures and movements and reduced ability to maintain antigravity head and trunk control. A stable sitting position is a prerequisite for participation in daily life, but there is a lack of objective measurement methods for this population.
RESEARCH QUESTION
Is it feasible to measure a stable sitting position with pressure mapping and 2D motion analysis, and can it detect differences to a) a reference group, b) between subgroups of CP and c) before and after treatment with intrathecal baclofen (ITB)?
METHODS
Pressure mapping, and a 2D motion analysis system, were used to capture movements of centre of pressure (CoP), and movements of head, hand and leg, sitting on a bench for 90 s. Twenty-two children with dyskinetic or bilateral spastic CP, GMFCS III-V, mean age 9.0, and 30 children with typical development (TD) mean age 10.7, were recruited between 2010 and 2019. Seventeen children were treated with ITB. Parents were interviewed regarding aspect of sitting. Non-parametric methods were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS
Differences in CoP and kinematics were detected with more movements in children with CP compared to children with TD (p < 0.001). There were more movements in children with dyskinetic CP compared to children with bilateral spastic CP as captured with the pressure mapping system (CoP distance p = .005 and Anterio-Posterior sway p = .014). After treatment with ITB, involuntary movements had decreased (CoP p = 0.006-0.035, kinematics p = 0.002-0.020). Parents reported improvement in sitting. The two measurement systems showed consistent results (rho 0.500-0.771, p = <0.001-0.049).
SIGNIFICANCE
It was feasible to objectively measure sitting position in children with a moderate-to-severe motor impairment with differences to a reference group and after an intervention. CoP and head movements were the variables that were easiest to capture.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35700638
pii: S0966-6362(22)00171-0
doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.05.039
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
210-215Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.