A new conceptional model for deriving average dermal absorption estimates from studies with multiple tested concentrations for non-dietary risk assessment of pesticides.
Dermal absorption
Exposure assessment
Pesticides
Plant protection products
Risk assessment
Simplified risk assessment
Journal
Archives of toxicology
ISSN: 1432-0738
Titre abrégé: Arch Toxicol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0417615
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2022
09 2022
Historique:
received:
13
04
2022
accepted:
25
05
2022
pubmed:
16
6
2022
medline:
29
7
2022
entrez:
15
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Dermal absorption values are used to translate external dermal exposure into potential systemic exposure for non-dietary risk assessment of pesticides. While the Environmental Protection Agency of the United States of America (US EPA) derives a common dermal absorption factor for active substances covering all related products, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) requests specific product-based estimates for individual concentrations covering the intended use rates. The latter poses challenges, because it disconnects exposure dose from applied dose in absorption studies, which may not be suitable in scenarios where concentration is not relevant. We analyzed the EFSA dermal absorption database, collected 33 human in vitro studies from CropLife Europe (CLE) companies, where ≥3 in-use dilution concentrations were tested, and 15 dermal absorption triple pack datasets. This shows that absolute dermal absorption correlates with absolute applied dose on a decadic logarithm-scale, which is concordant with the toxicological axiom that risk is driven by exposure dose. This method is radically different from the current European approach focused on concentrations and offers new insights into the relationship of internal and external exposure doses when utilizing data from in vitro studies. A single average dermal absorption value can be simply derived from studies with multiple tested concentrations, by calculating the y-intercept of a linear model on a decadic logarithm scale while assuming a slope of 1. This simplifies risk assessment and frees resources to explore exposure refinements. It also serves as a basis to harmonize dermal absorption estimation globally for use in exposure-driven risk assessments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35704048
doi: 10.1007/s00204-022-03320-3
pii: 10.1007/s00204-022-03320-3
pmc: PMC9325830
doi:
Substances chimiques
Pesticides
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2429-2445Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2022 Jul;132:105184
pubmed: 35577015
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2000 Feb;31(1):53-8
pubmed: 10715224
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020 Nov;117:104763
pubmed: 32781239
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Aug;106:55-67
pubmed: 31028797
ALTEX. 2021 Mar 12;38(3):463-476
pubmed: 33712859
EFSA J. 2017 Jun 30;15(6):e04873
pubmed: 32625532
Planta Med. 2022 Feb;88(2):144-151
pubmed: 34116569
J R Soc Interface. 2017 Sep;14(134):
pubmed: 28904005
Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2020 Sep;39(3):213-222
pubmed: 32643443
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Oct;52(1):3-23
pubmed: 18406028
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2021 Apr;121:104864
pubmed: 33450327
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018 Oct;98:171-183
pubmed: 30063949
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Oct;52(1):39-45
pubmed: 18423821
Food Chem Toxicol. 2006 Nov;44(11):1783-8
pubmed: 16872731
Ann Work Expo Health. 2021 May 3;65(4):397-405
pubmed: 33582764
J Appl Toxicol. 2020 Mar;40(3):403-415
pubmed: 31867769
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014 Apr;68(3):412-23
pubmed: 24491967
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020 Oct;116:104720
pubmed: 32645430
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Jun;72(1):58-70
pubmed: 25765508
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2021 Apr;121:104871
pubmed: 33485925
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Nov;108:104475
pubmed: 31539567
Toxicol Res. 2014 Dec;30(4):251-60
pubmed: 25584144
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020 Dec;118:104805
pubmed: 33075411