Multisite reproducibility of quantitative susceptibility mapping and effective transverse relaxation rate in deep gray matter at 3 T using locally optimized sequences in 24 traveling heads.
3 T
QSM
R2* mapping
multisite
reproducibility
Journal
NMR in biomedicine
ISSN: 1099-1492
Titre abrégé: NMR Biomed
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8915233
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2022
11 2022
Historique:
revised:
28
05
2022
received:
01
04
2022
accepted:
05
06
2022
pubmed:
16
6
2022
medline:
6
10
2022
entrez:
15
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Iron concentration in the human brain plays a crucial role in several neurodegenerative diseases and can be monitored noninvasively using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) and effective transverse relaxation rate (R
Substances chimiques
Iron
E1UOL152H7
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e4788Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
Pays : Canada
Informations de copyright
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Li N. Magnetic susceptibility quantification for arbitrarily shaped objects in inhomogeneous fields. Magn Reson Med. 2001;46(5):907-916. doi:10.1002/mrm.1276
Shmueli K, de Zwart JA, van Gelderen P, Li TQ, Dodd SJ, Duyn JH. Magnetic susceptibility mapping of brain tissue in vivo using MRI phase data. Magn Reson Med. 2009;62(6):1510-1522. doi:10.1002/mrm.22135
Liu C, Wei H, Gong NJ, Cronin M, Dibb R, Decker K. Quantitative susceptibility mapping: contrast mechanisms and clinical applications. Tomography. 2015;1(1):3-17. doi:10.18383/j.tom.2015.00136
Sedlacik J, Boelmans K, Löbel U, Holst B, Siemonsen S, Fiehler J. Reversible, irreversible and effective transverse relaxation rates in normal aging brain at 3T. NeuroImage. 2014;84:1032-1041. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.051
Uddin MN, Lebel RM, Wilman AH. Value of transverse relaxometry difference methods for iron in human brain. Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;34(1):51-59. doi:10.1016/j.mri.2015.09.002
Langkammer C, Krebs N, Goessler W, et al. Quantitative MR imaging of brain iron: A postmortem validation study. Radiology. 2010;257(2):455-462. doi:10.1148/radiol.10100495
Langkammer C, Schweser F, Krebs N, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) as a means to measure brain iron? A post mortem validation study. NeuroImage. 2012;62(3):1593-1599. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.049
Zheng W, Nichol H, Liu S, Cheng YCN, Haacke EM. Measuring iron in the brain using quantitative susceptibility mapping and X-ray fluorescence imaging. NeuroImage. 2013;78:68-74. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.022
Sun H, Walsh AJ, Lebel RM, et al. Validation of quantitative susceptibility mapping with Perls' iron staining for subcortical gray matter. NeuroImage. 2015;105:486-492. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.010
Larsen B, Bourque J, Moore TM, et al. Longitudinal development of brain iron is linked to cognition in youth. J Neurosci. 2020;40(9):1810-1818. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2434-19.2020
Peterson ET, Kwon D, Luna B, et al. Distribution of brain iron accrual in adolescence: evidence from cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis. Hum Brain Mapp. 2019;40(5):1480-1495. doi:10.1002/HBM.24461
Elkady AM, Cobzas D, Sun H, Seres P, Blevins G, Wilman AH. Five year iron changes in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis deep gray matter compared to healthy controls. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019;33:107-115. doi:10.1016/J.MSARD.2019.05.028
Acosta-Cabronero J, Betts MJ, Cardenas-Blanco A, Yang S, Nestor PJ. In vivo MRI mapping of brain iron deposition across the adult lifespan. J Neurosci. 2016;36(2):364-374. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1907-15.2016
Treit S, Naji N, Seres P, et al. R2* and quantitative susceptibility mapping in deep gray matter of 498 healthy controls from 5 to 90 years. Hum Brain Mapp. 2021;42(14):4597-4610. doi:10.1002/HBM.25569
Li W, Wu B, Batrachenko A, et al. Differential developmental trajectories of magnetic susceptibility in human brain gray and white matter over the lifespan. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014;35(6):2698-2713. doi:10.1002/hbm.22360
Persson N, Wu J, Zhang Q, et al. Age and sex related differences in subcortical brain iron concentrations among healthy adults. NeuroImage. 2015;122:385-398. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.050
Acosta-Cabronero J, Williams GB, Cardenas-Blanco A, Arnold RJ, Lupson V, Nestor PJ. In vivo quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) in Alzheimer's disease. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(11):e81093. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081093
Li X, Harrison DM, Liu H, et al. Magnetic susceptibility contrast variations in multiple sclerosis lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;43(2):463-473. doi:10.1002/jmri.24976
Barbosa JHO, Santos AC, Tumas V, et al. Quantifying brain iron deposition in patients with Parkinsons disease using quantitative susceptibility mapping, R2 and R2*. Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;33(5):559-565. doi:10.1016/j.mri.2015.02.021
Chen W, Zhu W, Kovanlikaya I, et al. Intracranial calcifications and hemorrhages: Characterization with quantitative susceptibility mapping. Radiology. 2014;270(2):496-505. doi:10.1148/radiol.13122640
Bush AI. The metallobiology of Alzheimers disease. Trends Neurosci. 2003;26(4):207-214. doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(03)00067-5
Martin WRW, Wieler M, Gee M. Midbrain iron content in early Parkinson disease: A potential biomarker of disease status. Neurology. 2008;70(16 PART 2):1411-1417. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000286384.31050.b5
Van Bergen JMG, Hua J, Unschuld PG, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping suggests altered brain iron in premanifest Huntington Disease. Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37(5):789-796. doi:10.3174/AJNR.A4617
Santin MD, Didier M, Valabrègue R, et al. Reproducibility of R2* and quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) reconstruction methods in the basal ganglia of healthy subjects. NMR Biomed. 2017;30(4):e3491. doi:10.1002/nbm.3491
Feng X, Deistung A, Reichenbach JR. Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) and R 2 * in the human brain at 3 T: Evaluation of intra-scanner repeatability. Z Med Phys. 2018;28(1):36-48. doi:10.1016/j.zemedi.2017.05.003
Rua C, Clarke WT, Driver ID, et al. Multi-centre, multi-vendor reproducibility of 7T QSM and R2* in the human brain: Results from the UK7T study. NeuroImage. 2020;223:117358. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117358
Lin PY, Chao TC, Wu ML. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain at 3T: A multisite reproducibility study. Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(3):467-474. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4137
Wang R, Xie G, Zhai M, et al. Stability of R2* and quantitative susceptibility mapping of the brain tissue in a large scale multi-center study. Sci Rep. 2017;7:45261. doi:10.1038/srep45261
Spincemaille P, Liu Z, Zhang S, et al. Clinical integration of automated processing for brain quantitative susceptibility mapping: multi-site reproducibility and single-site robustness. J Neuroimaging. 2019;29(6):689-698. doi:10.1111/jon.12658
Voelker MN, Kraff O, Goerke S, et al. The traveling heads 2.0: Multicenter reproducibility of quantitative imaging methods at 7 Tesla. NeuroImage. 2021;232:117910. doi:10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2021.117910
Hinoda T, Fushimi Y, Okada T, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping at 3 T and 1.5 T: evaluation of consistency and reproducibility. Invest Radiol. 2015;50(8):522-530. doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000159
Spincemaille P, Anderson J, Wu G, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping: MRI at 7T versus 3T. J Neuroimaging. 2020;30(1):65-75. doi:10.1111/jon.12669
Lancione M, Donatelli G, Cecchi P, Cosottini M, Tosetti M, Costagli M. Echo-time dependency of quantitative susceptibility mapping reproducibility at different magnetic field strengths. NeuroImage. 2019;197:557-564. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.004
Headley AM, Grice JV, Pickens DR. Reproducibility of liver iron concentration estimates in MRI through R2* measurement determined by least-squares curve fitting. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020;21(12):295-303. doi:10.1002/acm2.13096
Karsa A, Punwani S, Shmueli K. The effect of low resolution and coverage on the accuracy of susceptibility mapping. Magn Reson Med. 2019;81(3):1833-1848. doi:10.1002/mrm.27542
Lauzon ML, McCreary CR, McLean DA, Salluzzi M, Frayne R. Quantitative susceptibility mapping at 3 T: comparison of acquisition methodologies. NMR Biomed. 2017;30(4):e3492. doi:10.1002/nbm.3492
Walsh DO, Gmitro AF, Marcellin MW. Adaptive reconstruction of phased array MR imagery. Magn Reson Med. 2000;43(5):682-690. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(200005)43:5%3C682::AID-MRM10%3E3.0.CO;2-G
Abdul-Rahman HS, Gdeisat MA, Burton DR, Lalor MJ, Lilley F, Moore CJ. Fast and robust three-dimensional best path phase unwrapping algorithm. Appl Optics. 2007;46(26):6623. doi:10.1364/AO.46.006623
Li W, Wu B, Liu C. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain reflects spatial variation in tissue composition. NeuroImage. 2011;55(4):1645-1656. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.088
Pei M, Nguyen TD, Thimmappa ND, et al. Algorithm for fast monoexponential fitting based on Auto-Regression on Linear Operations (ARLO) of data. Magn Reson Med. 2015;73(2):843-850. doi:10.1002/mrm.25137
Smith SM. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002;17(3):143-155. doi:10.1002/hbm.10062
Liu C. STI Suite V3. https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~chunlei.liu/software.html Accessed July 21, 2021.
Hongfu S. QSM, GitHub. https://github.com/sunhongfu/QSM/blob/master/Siemens_3T/qsm_r2s_prisma.m Accessed July 21, 2021.
Cornell MRI Research Lab. MEDI Toolbox (15 January 2020 update). http://pre.weill.cornell.edu/mri/pages/qsm.html Accessed July 21, 2021.
Liu T, Wisnieff C, Lou M, Chen W, Spincemaille P, Wang Y. Nonlinear formulation of the magnetic field to source relationship for robust quantitative susceptibility mapping. Magn Reson Med. 2013;69(2):467-476. doi:10.1002/mrm.24272
Li W, Wang N, Yu F, et al. A method for estimating and removing streaking artifacts in quantitative susceptibility mapping. NeuroImage. 2015;108:111-122. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.043
Sun H, Wilman AH. Quantitative susceptibility mapping using single-shot echo-planar imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2015;73(5):1932-1938. doi:10.1002/mrm.25316
Bilgic B, Fan AP, Polimeni JR, et al. Fast quantitative susceptibility mapping with L1-regularization and automatic parameter selection. Magn Reson Med. 2014;72(5):1444-1459. doi:10.1002/mrm.25029
Manjón JV, Coupé P. Volbrain: an online MRI brain volumetry system. Front Neuroinform. 2016;10:30. doi:10.3389/fninf.2016.00030
Yushkevich PA, Piven J, Hazlett HC, et al. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability. NeuroImage. 2006;31(3):1116-1128. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.015
Avants BB, Tustison NJ, Song G, Cook PA, Klein A, Gee JC. A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration. NeuroImage. 2011;54(3):2033-2044. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.025
Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TEJ, Woolrich MW, Smith SM. FSL. NeuroImage. 2012;62(2):782-790. doi:10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2011.09.015
Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155-163. doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
Gibbons RD, Hedeker D. Applications of mixed-effects models in biostatistics. Sankhyā: Indian J Stat. 2000;Series B:70-103.
Klein R. Bland-Altman and Correlation Plot - File Exchange - MATLAB Central. MATLAB Central File Exchange. 2021. https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/45049-bland-altman-and-correlation-plot Accessed July 22, 2021.
Deh K, Nguyen TD, Eskreis-Winkler S, et al. Reproducibility of quantitative susceptibility mapping in the brain at two field strengths from two vendors. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;42(6):1592-1600. doi:10.1002/jmri.24943
Bender B, Klose U. The in vivo influence of white matter fiber orientation towards B0 on T2* in the human brain. NMR Biomed. 2010;23(9):1071-1076. doi:10.1002/nbm.1534
Li W, Liu C, Duong TQ, van Zijl PCM, Li X. Susceptibility tensor imaging (STI) of the brain. NMR Biomed. 2017;30(4):e3540. doi:10.1002/nbm.3540
Lancione M, Tosetti M, Donatelli G, Cosottini M, Costagli M. The impact of white matter fiber orientation in single-acquisition quantitative susceptibility mapping. NMR Biomed. 2017;30(11):e3798 doi:10.1002/nbm.3798
Schweser F, Robinson SD, de Rochefort L, Li W, Bredies K. An illustrated comparison of processing methods for phase MRI and QSM: removal of background field contributions from sources outside the region of interest. NMR Biomed. 2017;30(4):e3604. doi:10.1002/nbm.3604
Choi JY, Lee J, Nam Y, Lee J, Oh SH. Improvement of reproducibility in quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) and transverse relaxation rates (R2*) after physiological noise correction. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;49(6):1769-1776. doi:10.1002/jmri.26522
Karsa A. Optimising MRI Magnetic Susceptibility Mapping for Applications in Challenging Regions of the Body. Doctoral thesis. UCL (University College London); 2018.
Kiersnowski OC, Karsa A, Wastling SJ, Thornton JS, Shmueli K. The effect of oblique image acquisition on the accuracy of quantitative susceptibility mapping and a robust tilt correction method. bioRxiv (preprint). Published online December 1, 2021. doi:10.1101/2021.11.30.470544
Stewart AW, Robinson SD, OBrien K, et al. QSMxT: robust masking and artifact reduction for quantitative susceptibility mapping. Magn Reson Med. 2022;87(3):1289-1300. doi:10.1002/MRM.29048
Liu T, Khalidov I, de Rochefort L, et al. A novel background field removal method for MRI using projection onto dipole fields (PDF). NMR Biomed. 2011;24(9):1129-1136. doi:10.1002/NBM.1670
Zhou D, Liu T, Spincemaille P, Wang Y. Background field removal by solving the Laplacian boundary value problem. NMR Biomed. 2014;27(3):312-319. doi:10.1002/NBM.3064
Eskreis-Winkler S, Zhou D, Liu T, et al. On the influence of zero-padding on the nonlinear operations in quantitative susceptibility mapping. Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;35:154-159. doi:10.1016/J.MRI.2016.08.020
Langkammer C, Schweser F, Shmueli K, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping: Report from the 2016 reconstruction challenge. Magn Reson Med. 2018;79(3):1661-1673. doi:10.1002/MRM.26830
Bilgic B, Langkammer C, Marques JP, Meineke J, Milovic C, Schweser F. QSM reconstruction challenge 2.0: design and report of results. Magn Reson Med. 2021;86(3):1241-1255. doi:10.1002/MRM.28754
Berg RC, Preibisch C, Thomas DL, Shmueli K, Biondetti E. Investigating the effect of flow compensation and quantitative susceptibility mapping method on the accuracy of venous susceptibility measurement. NeuroImage. 2021;240:118399. doi:10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2021.118399