Caecal microbiota composition of experimental inbred MHC-B lines infected with IBV differs according to genetics and vaccination.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 06 2022
15 06 2022
Historique:
received:
05
08
2021
accepted:
25
05
2022
entrez:
15
6
2022
pubmed:
16
6
2022
medline:
18
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Interactions between the gut microbiota and the immune system may be involved in vaccine and infection responses. In the present study, we studied the interactions between caecal microbiota composition and parameters describing the immune response in six experimental inbred chicken lines harboring different MHC haplotypes. Animals were challenge-infected with the infectious bronchitis virus (IBV), and half of them were previously vaccinated against this pathogen. We explored to what extent the gut microbiota composition and the genetic line could be related to the immune response, evaluated through flow cytometry. To do so, we characterized the caecal bacterial communities with a 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing approach performed one week after the IBV infectious challenge. We observed significant effects of both the vaccination and the genetic line on the microbiota after the challenge infection with IBV, with a lower bacterial richness in vaccinated chickens. We also observed dissimilar caecal community profiles among the different lines, and between the vaccinated and non-vaccinated animals. The effect of vaccination was similar in all the lines, with a reduced abundance of OTU from the Ruminococcacea UCG-014 and Faecalibacterium genera, and an increased abundance of OTU from the Eisenbergiella genus. The main association between the caecal microbiota and the immune phenotypes involved TCR
Identifiants
pubmed: 35705568
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13512-7
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-13512-7
pmc: PMC9199466
doi:
Substances chimiques
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
0
Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell
0
Viral Vaccines
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
9995Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Hughes, L., Hermans, P. & Morgan, K. Risk factors for the use of prescription antibiotics on UK broiler farms. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 61, 947–952 (2008).
pubmed: 18227086
doi: 10.1093/jac/dkn017
Hocking, P. M. Unexpected consequences of genetic selection in broilers and turkeys: Problems and solutions. Br. Poult. Sci. 55, 1–12 (2014).
pubmed: 24397366
doi: 10.1080/00071668.2014.877692
Saxena, V. K. Selection methods in poultry breeding: from genetics to genomics. In Application of Genetics and Genomics in Poultry Science (ed. Liu, G. K.) Ch. 2 (IntechOpen, 2018). https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.77966 .
Cheema, M. A., Qureshi, M. A. & Havenstein, G. B. A comparison of the immune response of a 2001 commercial broiler with a 1957 randombred broiler strain when fed representative 1957 and 2001 broiler diets. Poult. Sci. 82, 1519–1529 (2003).
pubmed: 14601727
doi: 10.1093/ps/82.10.1519
Yunis, R., Ben-David, A., Heller, E. D. & Cahaner, A. Immunocompetence and viability under commercial conditions of broiler groups differing in growth rate and in antibody response to Escherichia coli vaccine. Poult. Sci. 79, 810–816 (2000).
pubmed: 10875760
doi: 10.1093/ps/79.6.810
Han, F.-S. & Smyth, J. R. The influence of growth rate on the development of Marek’s disease in chickens. Poult. Sci. 51, 975–985 (1972).
pubmed: 4646680
doi: 10.3382/ps.0510975
van der Most, P. J., de Jong, B., Parmentier, H. K. & Verhulst, S. Trade-off between growth and immune function: A meta-analysis of selection experiments. Funct. Ecol. 25, 74–80 (2011).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01800.x
Zerjal, T. et al. Assessment of trade-offs between feed efficiency, growth-related traits, and immune activity in experimental lines of layer chickens. Genetics Sel. Evol. 53, 1 (2021).
Mahfuz, S. U. et al. Inclusion of probiotic on chicken performance and immunity: A review. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 16, 328–335 (2017).
doi: 10.3923/ijps.2017.328.335
Marangon, S. & Busani, L. The use of vaccination in poultry production. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epiz 26, 265 (2006).
doi: 10.20506/rst.26.1.1742
Shrestha, A., Sadeyen, J. R. & Iqbal, M. Enhancing protective efficacy of poultry vaccines through targeted delivery of antigens to antigen-presenting cells. Vaccines 6, 75 (2018).
pmcid: 6313852
doi: 10.3390/vaccines6040075
Tarigan, S. et al. Field effectiveness of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 vaccination in commercial layers in Indonesia. PLoS ONE 13, e0190947 (2018).
pubmed: 29320563
pmcid: 5761929
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190947
Francis, M. J. A veterinary vaccine development process map to assist in the development of new vaccines. Vaccine 38, 4512–4515 (2020).
pubmed: 32418794
pmcid: 7200350
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.05.007
Ciabattini, A., Olivieri, R., Lazzeri, E. & Medaglini, D. Role of the microbiota in the modulation of vaccine immune responses. Front. Microbiol. 10, 1305 (2019).
pubmed: 31333592
pmcid: 6616116
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01305
Lynn, D. J., Benson, S. C., Lynn, M. A. & Pulendran, B. Modulation of immune responses to vaccination by the microbiota: Implications and potential mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 22, 33–46 (2022).
pubmed: 34002068
doi: 10.1038/s41577-021-00554-7
Cording, S., Medvedovic, J., Lecuyer, E., Aychek, T. & Eberl, G. Control of pathogens and microbiota by innate lymphoid cells. Microbes Infect. 20, 317–322 (2018).
pubmed: 29852240
doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2018.05.003
Chaung, H.-C. et al. Salmonella flagellin enhances mucosal immunity of avian influenza vaccine in chickens. Vet. Microbiol. 157, 69–77 (2012).
pubmed: 22226542
doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.12.014
Cui, Y. et al. Immunization of chickens with the enterobactin conjugate vaccine reduced campylobacter jejuni colonization in the intestine. Vaccines 8, 1–13 (2020).
doi: 10.3390/vaccines8040747
Carrasco, J. M. D., Casanova, N. A. & Miyakawa, M. E. F. Microbiota, gut health and chicken productivity: What is the connection?. Microorganisms 7, 374 (2019).
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7100374
Rubio, L. A. Possibilities of early life programming in broiler chickens via intestinal microbiota modulation. Poult. Sci. 98, 695–706 (2019).
pubmed: 30247675
doi: 10.3382/ps/pey416
Nothaft, H. et al. Coadministration of the Campylobacter jejuni N-Glycan-based vaccine with probiotics improves vaccine performance in broiler chickens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM (2017).
doi: 10.1128/AEM
pubmed: 28939610
pmcid: 5691412
Tarabees, R., El-Sayed, M. S., Shehata, A. A. & Diab, M. S. Effects of the probiotic candidate E. faecalis-1, the Poulvac E. coli vaccine, and their combination on growth performance, caecal microbial composition, immune response, and protection against E. coli O78 challenge in broiler chickens. Probiotics Antimicrobial Proteins 12, 860–872 (2020).
pubmed: 31650414
doi: 10.1007/s12602-019-09588-9
Yitbarek, A. et al. Commensal gut microbiota can modulate adaptive immune responses in chickens vaccinated with whole inactivated avian influenza virus subtype H9N2. Vaccine 37, 6640–6647 (2019).
pubmed: 31542262
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.09.046
Loywyck, V., der Laan, M. H. P. & van, Goldringer, I. & Verrier, E.,. On the need for combining complementary analyses to assess the effect of a candidate gene and the evolution of its polymorphism: The example of the Major Histocompatibility Complex in chicken. Genet. Res. 87, 125–131 (2006).
pubmed: 16684400
doi: 10.1017/S0016672306008044
Oviedo-Rondón, E. O., Hume, M. E., Hernández, C. & Clemente-Hernández, S. Intestinal microbial ecology of broilers vaccinated and challenged with mixed eimeria species, and supplemented with essential oil blends. Poult. Sci. 85, 854–860 (2006).
pubmed: 16673762
doi: 10.1093/ps/85.5.854
Wang, X. et al. Effects of Bacillus subtilis and coccidial vaccination on cecal microbial diversity and composition of Eimeria-challenged male broilers. Poult. Sci. 98, 3839–3849 (2019).
pubmed: 30843054
doi: 10.3382/ps/pez096
Miller, M. M. & Taylor, R. L. Brief review of the chicken Major Histocompatibility Complex: The genes, their distribution on chromosome 16, and their contributions to disease resistance. Poult. Sci. 95, 375–392 (2016).
pubmed: 26740135
pmcid: 4988538
doi: 10.3382/ps/pev379
Banat, G. R. et al. Association of the chicken MHC B haplotypes with resistance to avian coronavirus. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 39, 430–437 (2013).
pubmed: 23178407
doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2012.10.006
Larsen, F. T. et al. Immunoprofiling of peripheral blood from infectious bronchitis virus vaccinated MHC-B chicken lines—Monocyte MHC-II expression as a potential correlate of protection. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 96, 93–102 (2019).
pubmed: 30763593
doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2019.02.004
Ignjatovic, J. & Sapats, S. Avian infectious bronchitis virus. Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz 19, 493 (2000).
doi: 10.20506/rst.19.2.1228
da Silva, A. P., Hauck, R., Zhou, H. & Gallardo, R. A. Understanding immune resistance to infectious bronchitis using major histocompatibility complex chicken lines. Avian Dis. 61, 358–365 (2017).
pubmed: 28956996
doi: 10.1637/11666-050117-RegR
Gelb, J., Nix, W. A. & Gellman, S. D. Infectious bronchitis virus antibodies in tears and their relationship to immunity. Avian Dis. 42, 364–374 (1998).
pubmed: 9645328
doi: 10.2307/1592487
Xu, P. et al. 16S rRNA gene sequencing reveals an altered composition of the gut microbiota in chickens infected with a nephropathogenic infectious bronchitis virus. Sci. Rep. 10, 1 (2020).
Groves, H. T. et al. Respiratory disease following viral lung infection alters the murine gut microbiota. Front. Immunol. 9, 182 (2018).
pubmed: 29483910
pmcid: 5816042
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00182
Nelson, A. M. et al. Disruption of the human gut microbiota following Norovirus infection. PLoS ONE 7, e48224 (2012).
pubmed: 23118957
pmcid: 3484122
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048224
Abdo, Z. et al. Longitudinal impact of oral probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus vaccine strains on the immune response and gut microbiome of mice. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/691709 (2019).
doi: 10.1101/691709
Kajikawa, A. et al. Mucosal immunogenicity of genetically modified Lactobacillus acidophilus expressing an HIV-1 epitope within the surface layer protein. PLoS ONE 10, e0141713 (2015).
pubmed: 26509697
pmcid: 4624987
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141713
Kers, J. G. et al. Host and environmental factors affecting the intestinal microbiota in chickens. Front. Microbiol. 9, 1 (2018).
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00235
Wang, L., Lilburn, M. & Yu, Z. Intestinal microbiota of broiler chickens as affected by litter management regimens. Front. Microbiol. 7, 593 (2016).
pubmed: 27242676
pmcid: 4870231
Mignon-Grasteau, S. et al. Impact of selection for digestive efficiency on microbiota composition in the chicken. PLoS ONE 10, e0135488 (2015).
pubmed: 26267269
pmcid: 4534097
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135488
Schokker, D. et al. Early life microbial colonization of the gut and intestinal development differ between genetically divergent broiler lines. BMC Genomics 16, 1 (2015).
doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1646-6
Nakajima, A. et al. IgA regulates the composition and metabolic function of gut microbiota by promoting symbiosis between bacteria. J. Exp. Med. 215, 2019–2034 (2018).
pubmed: 30042191
pmcid: 6080902
doi: 10.1084/jem.20180427
Rougière, N., Gomez, J., Mignon-Grasteau, S. & Carré, B. Effects of diet particle size on digestive parameters in D+ and D− genetic chicken lines selected for divergent digestion efficiency. Poult. Sci. 88, 1206–1215 (2009).
pubmed: 19439632
doi: 10.3382/ps.2008-00408
Schroeder, B. O. Fight them or feed them: How the intestinal mucus layer manages the gut microbiota. Gastroenterol. Rep. 7, 3–12 (2019).
doi: 10.1093/gastro/goy052
Adolph, T. E., Mayr, L., Grabherr, F., Schwärzler, J. & Tilg, H. Pancreas–microbiota cross talk in health and disease. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 39, 249–266 (2019).
pubmed: 31433743
doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-082018-124306
Ridlon, J. M., Kang, D. J., Hylemon, P. B. & Bajaj, J. S. Bile acids and the gut microbiome. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 30, 332–338 (2014).
pubmed: 24625896
pmcid: 4215539
doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000057
Hamal, K. R., Burgess, S. C., Pevzner, I. Y. & Erf, G. F. Maternal antibody transfer from dams to their egg yolks, egg whites, and chicks in meat lines of chickens. Poult. Sci. 85, 1364–1372 (2006).
pubmed: 16903465
doi: 10.1093/ps/85.8.1364
Kubinak, J. L. et al. MHC variation sculpts individualized microbial communities that control susceptibility to enteric infection. Nat. Commun. 6, 1 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/ncomms9642
Bolnick, D. I. et al. Major histocompatibility complex class IIb polymorphism influences gut microbiota composition and diversity. Mol. Ecol. 23, 4831–4845 (2014).
pubmed: 24975397
doi: 10.1111/mec.12846
Wadud Khan, M. A., Zac Stephens, W., Mohammed, A. D., Round, J. L. & Kubinak, J. L. Does MHC heterozygosity influence microbiota form and function?. PLoS ONE 14, e0215946 (2019).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215946
Kaufman, J. Generalists and specialists: A new view of how MHC class I molecules fight infectious pathogens. Trends Immunol. 39, 367–379 (2018).
pubmed: 29396014
pmcid: 5929564
doi: 10.1016/j.it.2018.01.001
Pearce, D. S., Hoover, B. A., Jennings, S., Nevitt, G. A. & Docherty, K. M. Morphological and genetic factors shape the microbiome of a seabird species (Oceanodroma leucorhoa) more than environmental and social factors. Microbiome 5, 1 (2017).
doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0365-4
Ducatelle, R. et al. Biomarkers for monitoring intestinal health in poultry: Present status and future perspectives. Vet. Res. 49, 1 (2018).
doi: 10.1186/s13567-018-0538-6
Mon, K. K. Z. et al. Salmonella enterica serovars enteritidis infection alters the indigenous microbiota diversity in young layer chicks. Front. Vet. Sci. 2, 61 (2015).
pubmed: 26664988
pmcid: 4672283
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2015.00061
Smith, A. L., Powers, C. & Beal, R. K. Chapter 13—The avian enteric immune system in health and disease. In Avian Immunology, 2nd edn (eds. Schat, K. A., Kaspers, B. & Kaiser, P.) 227–250 (Academic Press, 2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-396965-1.00013-3 .
Cooper, M. D., Chen, C.-L. H., Bucy, R. P. & Thompson, C. B. Avian T cell ontogeny. In Advances in Immunology (eds. Dixon, F. J. et al.) vol. 50, 87–117 (Academic Press, 1991).
Berndt, A., Pieper, J. & Methner, U. Circulating γδ T cells in response to Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis exposure in chickens. Infect. Immunol. 74, 3967–3978 (2006).
doi: 10.1128/IAI.01128-05
Li, M. et al. Upregulation of intestinal barrier function in mice with DSS-induced colitis by a defined bacterial consortium is associated with expansion of IL-17A producing gamma delta T cells. Front. Immunol. 8, 824 (2017).
pubmed: 28747917
pmcid: 5506203
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00824
Lee, J. S. et al. Interleukin-23-independent IL-17 production regulates intestinal epithelial permeability. Immunity 43, 727–738 (2015).
pubmed: 26431948
pmcid: 6044435
doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.09.003
Li, F. et al. The microbiota maintain homeostasis of liver-resident γδ T-17 cells in a lipid antigen/CD1d-dependent manner. Nat. Commun. 7, 1 (2017).
Salomonsen, J. et al. Two CD1 genes map to the chicken MHC, indicating that CD1 genes are ancient and likely to have been present in the primordial MHC. PNAS 102, 8668–8673 (2005).
pubmed: 15939887
pmcid: 1150808
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409213102
Godon, J.-J. et al. Molecular microbial diversity of an anaerobic digestor as determined by small-subunit rDNA sequence analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63, 2802–2813 (1997).
pubmed: 9212428
pmcid: 168577
doi: 10.1128/aem.63.7.2802-2813.1997
Lluch, J. et al. The characterization of novel tissue microbiota using an optimized 16S metagenomic sequencing pipeline. PLoS ONE 10, e0142334 (2015).
pubmed: 26544955
pmcid: 4636327
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142334
Escudié, F. et al. FROGS: find, rapidly, OTUs with galaxy solution. Bioinformatics 34, 1287–1294 (2018).
pubmed: 29228191
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx791
Mahé, F., Rognes, T., Quince, C., de Vargas, C. & Dunthorn, M. Swarm: robust and fast clustering method for amplicon-based studies. PeerJ 2, e593 (2014).
pubmed: 25276506
pmcid: 4178461
doi: 10.7717/peerj.593
Rognes, T., Flouri, T., Nichols, B., Quince, C. & Mahé, F. VSEARCH: A versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ 4, e2584 (2016).
pubmed: 27781170
pmcid: 5075697
doi: 10.7717/peerj.2584
Bokulich, N. A. et al. Quality-filtering vastly improves diversity estimates from Illumina amplicon sequencing. Nat. Methods 10, 57–59 (2013).
pubmed: 23202435
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2276
Camacho, C. et al. BLAST+: Architecture and applications. BMC Bioinform. 10, 1 (2009).
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421
Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590 (2013).
pubmed: 23193283
doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219
Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013).
pubmed: 23329690
pmcid: 3603318
doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010
Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S. & Arkin, A. P. FastTree 2—Approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 5, e9490 (2010).
pubmed: 20224823
pmcid: 2835736
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490
Paulson, J. N., Stine, O. C., Bravo, H. C. & Pop, M. Differential abundance analysis for microbial marker-gene surveys. Nat. Methods 10, 1200–1202 (2013).
pubmed: 24076764
pmcid: 4010126
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2658