Effect of the knee replacement surgery on activity level based on ActivPAL: a systematic review and meta-analysis study.
ActivPAL
Activity level
Knee replacement
Journal
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Jun 2022
15 Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
14
01
2022
accepted:
06
06
2022
entrez:
15
6
2022
pubmed:
16
6
2022
medline:
18
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The knee replacement (KR) surgery aims to restore the activity level and reduce the risk of experiencing disabilities. The outcomes of this surgery are evaluated mainly with subjective tools or low validity objective tools. However, the effect of the surgery on activity level using high validity objective accelerometer is still in question. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the benefit of KR surgery alone to enhance physical activity recommendations based on high validity accelerometer. Two independent reviewers evaluated five electronic databases (Cochrane-Central-Register-of-Controlled Trials, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus) to find relative studies between January 2000 and October 2021. The quality assessments and risk of bias assessments were examined. Three articles were included with 202 participants (86 males, 116 females), with an average age of 64 years and an average 32 kg/m Knee replacement surgery is an effective treatment for improving patients' quality of life with severe knee injuries. However, various factors impact the success of surgical and achieving maximum benefit of the surgery. One factor, sedentary time, can be reduced by implementing pre-and post-surgery exercise or physical activity recommendations. Further studies are needed to understand the benefit of surgery with or without rehabilitation assessed using high validity monitors.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The knee replacement (KR) surgery aims to restore the activity level and reduce the risk of experiencing disabilities. The outcomes of this surgery are evaluated mainly with subjective tools or low validity objective tools. However, the effect of the surgery on activity level using high validity objective accelerometer is still in question.
METHODS
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the benefit of KR surgery alone to enhance physical activity recommendations based on high validity accelerometer. Two independent reviewers evaluated five electronic databases (Cochrane-Central-Register-of-Controlled Trials, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus) to find relative studies between January 2000 and October 2021. The quality assessments and risk of bias assessments were examined.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Three articles were included with 202 participants (86 males, 116 females), with an average age of 64 years and an average 32 kg/m
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Knee replacement surgery is an effective treatment for improving patients' quality of life with severe knee injuries. However, various factors impact the success of surgical and achieving maximum benefit of the surgery. One factor, sedentary time, can be reduced by implementing pre-and post-surgery exercise or physical activity recommendations. Further studies are needed to understand the benefit of surgery with or without rehabilitation assessed using high validity monitors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35705950
doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05531-2
pii: 10.1186/s12891-022-05531-2
pmc: PMC9199222
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
576Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Oct 02;9:119
pubmed: 23031188
BMJ. 2017 Mar 28;356:j1131
pubmed: 28351833
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Aug;94(8):1051-7
pubmed: 22844045
Clin Interv Aging. 2021 Mar 04;16:403-413
pubmed: 33692619
J Aging Phys Act. 2008 Apr;16(2):201-14
pubmed: 18483442
Int J Surg. 2014 Dec;12(12):1500-24
pubmed: 25046751
J Arthroplasty. 2013 May;28(5):740-6
pubmed: 23454106
Physiother Res Int. 2016 Jun;21(2):77-83
pubmed: 25727096
Br J Sports Med. 2006 Dec;40(12):992-7
pubmed: 16980531
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71
pubmed: 33782057
Med Eng Phys. 2007 Oct;29(8):930-4
pubmed: 17134934
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 16;147(8):W163-94
pubmed: 17938389
Phys Ther. 2012 Sep;92(9):1109-16
pubmed: 22628580
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Mar;35(3):712-719.e4
pubmed: 31722854
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Sep;30(9):1521-5
pubmed: 25882608
Arthritis. 2014;2014:173857
pubmed: 25349736
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Jun;46(6):431-42
pubmed: 27117726
Open Access J Sports Med. 2018 Mar 15;9:55-68
pubmed: 29588622
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919
pubmed: 27733354
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Mar;36(3):885-891
pubmed: 32981772
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Jan;90(1):37-42
pubmed: 18160497
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 May;472(5):1502-11
pubmed: 24353051
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Mar;35(3):706-711
pubmed: 31740103
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016 Aug;24(8):1317-29
pubmed: 27012756
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Jun;88(6):1201-7
pubmed: 16757751
Clin Geriatr Med. 2012 Aug;28(3):367-94
pubmed: 22840304
J Sport Health Sci. 2017 Jun;6(2):162-178
pubmed: 30356601
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Sep;466(9):2201-8
pubmed: 18506555
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Jun 18;22:100810
pubmed: 34195473
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Dec;472(12):3933-40
pubmed: 25053290
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Jun;70(6):892-901
pubmed: 28898559
Circulation. 2007 Aug 28;116(9):1081-93
pubmed: 17671237
Sensors (Basel). 2010;10(8):7772-88
pubmed: 22163626