Reliability and Reproducibility of a Novel Grading System for Lesions of the Ligamentous-Fossa-Foveolar Complex in Young Patients Undergoing Open Hip Preservation Surgery.
femoroacetabular impingement
fossa acetabuli
hip arthroscopy
joint preserving surgery
ligamentum capitis femoris
ligamentum teres
perifoveolar area
surgical hip dislocation
validation of grading system
Journal
Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 2325-9671
Titre abrégé: Orthop J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101620522
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
23
02
2022
accepted:
09
03
2022
entrez:
16
6
2022
pubmed:
17
6
2022
medline:
17
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Several classification systems based on arthroscopy have been used to describe lesions of the ligamentum teres (LT) in young active patients undergoing hip-preserving surgery. Inspection of the LT and associated lesions of the adjuvant fovea capitis and acetabular fossa is limited when done arthroscopically but is much more thorough during open surgical hip dislocation. Therefore, we propose a novel grading system based on our findings during surgical dislocation comprising the full spectrum of ligamentous-fossa-foveolar complex (LFFC) lesions. To determine (1) intraobserver reliability and (2) interobserver reproducibility of our new grading system. Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. We performed this validation study on 211 hips (633 images in total) with surgical hip dislocation (2013-2021). We randomly selected 5 images per grade for each LFFC item to achieve an equal representation of all grades (resulting in 75 images). The ligament, fossa, and fovea were subcategorized into normal, inflammation, degeneration, partial, and complete defects. All surgeries were performed in a standardized way by a single surgeon. The femur was disarticulated using a bone hook, the LT was inspected, documented and resected, then the fossa and fovea were documented with the femoral head in full dislocation using a 70° arthroscope. Six observers with different levels of expertise in hip-preserving surgery independently conducted the measurements twice, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to determine (1) intraobserver reliability and (2) interobserver reproducibility of the novel grading system. For intraobserver reliability, excellent ICCs were found in both the junior and the experienced raters for grading the ligament, fossa, fovea, and total LFFC (ICCs ranged from 0.91 to 0.99 for the LFFC score). We found excellent interobserver reproducibility between raters for all items of the LFFC (all interobserver ICCs ≥ 0.76). Our new grading system for lesions of the LFFC is highly reliable and reproducible. It covers the full spectrum of damage more precisely than arthroscopic classifications do and offers a scientific basis for standardized intraoperative evaluation.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Several classification systems based on arthroscopy have been used to describe lesions of the ligamentum teres (LT) in young active patients undergoing hip-preserving surgery. Inspection of the LT and associated lesions of the adjuvant fovea capitis and acetabular fossa is limited when done arthroscopically but is much more thorough during open surgical hip dislocation. Therefore, we propose a novel grading system based on our findings during surgical dislocation comprising the full spectrum of ligamentous-fossa-foveolar complex (LFFC) lesions.
Purpose
UNASSIGNED
To determine (1) intraobserver reliability and (2) interobserver reproducibility of our new grading system.
Study Design
UNASSIGNED
Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
We performed this validation study on 211 hips (633 images in total) with surgical hip dislocation (2013-2021). We randomly selected 5 images per grade for each LFFC item to achieve an equal representation of all grades (resulting in 75 images). The ligament, fossa, and fovea were subcategorized into normal, inflammation, degeneration, partial, and complete defects. All surgeries were performed in a standardized way by a single surgeon. The femur was disarticulated using a bone hook, the LT was inspected, documented and resected, then the fossa and fovea were documented with the femoral head in full dislocation using a 70° arthroscope. Six observers with different levels of expertise in hip-preserving surgery independently conducted the measurements twice, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to determine (1) intraobserver reliability and (2) interobserver reproducibility of the novel grading system.
Results
UNASSIGNED
For intraobserver reliability, excellent ICCs were found in both the junior and the experienced raters for grading the ligament, fossa, fovea, and total LFFC (ICCs ranged from 0.91 to 0.99 for the LFFC score). We found excellent interobserver reproducibility between raters for all items of the LFFC (all interobserver ICCs ≥ 0.76).
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
Our new grading system for lesions of the LFFC is highly reliable and reproducible. It covers the full spectrum of damage more precisely than arthroscopic classifications do and offers a scientific basis for standardized intraoperative evaluation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35706555
doi: 10.1177/23259671221098750
pii: 10.1177_23259671221098750
pmc: PMC9189540
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
23259671221098750Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this contribution. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.
Références
Clin Sports Med. 2001 Oct;20(4):749-61
pubmed: 11675884
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2012 Nov;21(6):574-8
pubmed: 22871962
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb;472(2):674-80
pubmed: 24096455
Arthroscopy. 2013 Jan;29(1):64-73
pubmed: 23276414
Arthroscopy. 1997 Oct;13(5):575-8
pubmed: 9343644
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001 Nov;83(8):1119-24
pubmed: 11764423
Acta Orthop Scand. 2000 Oct;71(5):452-4
pubmed: 11186399
Arthroscopy. 2005 Mar;21(3):382; author reply 383
pubmed: 15756196
Arthroscopy. 2014 Dec;30(12):1582-7
pubmed: 25129862
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007 Jul;15(7):908-14
pubmed: 17479250
Radiology. 2012 May;263(2):484-91
pubmed: 22416250
Arthroscopy. 2016 Jul;32(7):1293-7
pubmed: 27083534
Am J Sports Med. 2021 Oct 08;:3635465211036104
pubmed: 34623933
Stat Med. 2002 May 15;21(9):1331-5
pubmed: 12111881
Arthroscopy. 2004 Apr;20(4):385-91
pubmed: 15067278
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jul;39 Suppl:117S-25S
pubmed: 21709041
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2014 Jul 30;1(1):3-11
pubmed: 27011796
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 May 1;479(5):1002-1013
pubmed: 33787519
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Mar;467(3):732-8
pubmed: 19067094
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2015 Jul 01;2(3):258-64
pubmed: 27011847
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Jan;91(1):8-15
pubmed: 19091998
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2017 Mar 05;4(2):187-193
pubmed: 28630741
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2017 Oct 16;5(2):113-118
pubmed: 29876126