Testing differentially methylated regions through functional principal component analysis.
DNA methylation
Functional principal component
epigenetics
next-generation sequencing
Journal
Journal of applied statistics
ISSN: 0266-4763
Titre abrégé: J Appl Stat
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9883455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
entrez:
16
6
2022
pubmed:
30
1
2021
medline:
30
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
DNA methylation is an epigenetic modification that plays an important role in many biological processes and diseases. Several statistical methods have been proposed to test for DNA methylation differences between conditions at individual cytosine sites, followed by a post hoc aggregation procedure to explore regional differences. While there are benefits to analyzing CpGs individually, there are both biological and statistical reasons to test entire genomic regions for differential methylation. Variability in methylation levels measured by Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) is often observed across CpG sites in a genomic region. Evaluating meaningful changes in regional level methylation profiles between conditions over noisy site-level measurements is often difficult to implement with parametric models. To overcome these limitations, this study develops a nonparametric approach to detect predefined differentially methylated regions (DMR) based on functional principal component analysis (FPCA). The performance of this approach is compared with two alternative methods (GIFT and M3D), using real and simulated data.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35707559
doi: 10.1080/02664763.2021.1877636
pii: 1877636
pmc: PMC9042039
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1677-1691Informations de copyright
© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Références
Bioinformatics. 2015 Mar 15;31(6):809-16
pubmed: 25398611
Bioinformatics. 2014 May 15;30(10):1363-9
pubmed: 24478339
Genome Biol. 2012 Oct 03;13(10):R83
pubmed: 23034175
Bioinformatics. 2013 Jul 01;29(13):1647-53
pubmed: 23658421
Nat Protoc. 2011 Apr;6(4):468-81
pubmed: 21412275
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014 May 01;6(5):a019133
pubmed: 24789823
Nat Protoc. 2015 Mar;10(3):475-83
pubmed: 25692984
Nat Methods. 2012 Jan 30;9(2):145-51
pubmed: 22290186
Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Oct 13;33(18):5868-77
pubmed: 16224102
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Feb 1;41(4):e55
pubmed: 23268441
PLoS Genet. 2012;8(6):e1002781
pubmed: 22737091
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Aug;41(14):6816-27
pubmed: 23748561
Genome Res. 2013 Mar;23(3):555-67
pubmed: 23325432
Nat Med. 1995 Jul;1(7):686-92
pubmed: 7585152
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2016 Jun 1;15(3):237-51
pubmed: 26982617
Bioinformatics. 2014 Sep 1;30(17):2414-22
pubmed: 24836530