Correlation of PD-L1 expression on tumour cells between diagnostic biopsies and surgical specimens of lung cancer in real life with respect to biopsy techniques and neoadjuvant treatment.
Biopsy
Immunotherapy
Lung cancer
PD-L1 expression
Journal
Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology
ISSN: 1432-1335
Titre abrégé: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7902060
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2023
May 2023
Historique:
received:
09
02
2022
accepted:
19
05
2022
medline:
14
4
2023
pubmed:
17
6
2022
entrez:
16
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) testing is performed mainly on biopsy specimens in patients with advanced lung cancer. It is questionable whether the small amount of tissue analysed in biopsies may represent the true PD-L1 expression of a tumour. In this retrospective study, PD-L1 expression on tumour cells derived from bronchoscopy brush cytology, endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), endobronchial biopsy, transbronchial biopsy (TBB) and computed tomography (CT)-guided transthoracic biopsy was compared to the PD-L1 expression of the corresponding surgical resection in lung cancer patients with regard to neoadjuvant treatment in-between. A quantitative comparison between the diagnostic biopsy of the primary tumour with corresponding resected surgical specimens in a total of 113 lung cancer patients (60% male, mean age 65 ± 9 years) revealed a statistically significant correlation of PD-L1 expression on tumour cells (r = 0.58, p< 0.001), for patients without neoadjuvant treatment in-between and for patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment (both p < 0.001). Using a cut-off value of ≥ 50% PD-L1 TPS for comparing the biopsy samples and resected specimens, the concordance rate was 78% with a Cohen's Kappa of 0.45. A statistically significant concordance for PD-L1 expression on tumour cells between biopsies from primary lung tumour and resected specimen was found, but of uncertain clinical accuracy. The use of a cut-off value of ≥ 50% PD-L1 TPS resulted only in a moderate agreement. Therefore, the interpretation of the PD-L1 determined form biopsy specimens status should only be considered with caution for treatment decisionsQuery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35708777
doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-04080-4
pii: 10.1007/s00432-022-04080-4
pmc: PMC10097774
doi:
Substances chimiques
CD274 protein, human
0
B7-H1 Antigen
0
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1747-1754Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018 Jul;144(7):1219-1226
pubmed: 29675791
Clin Lung Cancer. 2022 Jan;23(1):43-51
pubmed: 34565707
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016 Apr;100:88-98
pubmed: 26895815
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 29;6:20090
pubmed: 26822379
Onco Targets Ther. 2019 Dec 30;12:11541-11547
pubmed: 31920342
Lancet. 2016 Apr 30;387(10030):1837-46
pubmed: 26970723
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 31;378(22):2078-2092
pubmed: 29658856
Clin Lung Cancer. 2015 Sep;16(5):385-90
pubmed: 25937270
Lung Cancer. 2019 Aug;134:79-84
pubmed: 31320000
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Jan;2(1):46-54
pubmed: 26562159
BMC Cancer. 2019 Jun 7;19(1):546
pubmed: 31174496
Lancet. 2016 Apr 9;387(10027):1540-1550
pubmed: 26712084
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 13;383(7):640-649
pubmed: 32786189
Cancer Cytopathol. 2017 Dec;125(12):896-907
pubmed: 29024471
Lung Cancer. 2022 Apr;166:143-149
pubmed: 35279453
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Oct;12(10):1536-1543
pubmed: 28751245
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;35(34):3867-3876
pubmed: 29053400
Ann Oncol. 2016 Jan;27(1):147-53
pubmed: 26483045
Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 23;10:551367
pubmed: 33708615
Oncologist. 2019 Feb;24(Suppl 1):S31-S41
pubmed: 30819829
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 9;373(2):123-35
pubmed: 26028407