Kinetics of cellular and humoral responses to third BNT162B2 COVID-19 vaccine over six months in heart transplant recipients - implications for the omicron variant.
AIDS Vaccines
Animals
Antibodies, Viral
BCG Vaccine
BNT162 Vaccine
COVID-19
/ prevention & control
COVID-19 Vaccines
Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine
Heart Transplantation
Humans
Influenza Vaccines
Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine
Mice
Mice, Inbred BALB C
Papillomavirus Vaccines
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines
SAIDS Vaccines
SARS-CoV-2
BNT162b2 vaccine
SARS-CoV-2-specificT-cell
heart transplantation
neutralization
omicron
Journal
The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation
ISSN: 1557-3117
Titre abrégé: J Heart Lung Transplant
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9102703
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2022
10 2022
Historique:
received:
30
01
2022
revised:
21
04
2022
accepted:
20
05
2022
pubmed:
17
6
2022
medline:
5
10
2022
entrez:
16
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The durability of the immune response following the 3-dose BNT162b2 vaccination is unknown. The complexity of the situation is enhanced by the threat that highly transmissible variants may further accelerate the decline in the protection afforded by mRNA vaccines. One hundred and three 3-dose-vaccinated heart transplant recipients were longitudinally assessed for the kinetics of variant-specific neutralization (Cohort 1, n = 60) and SARS-CoV-2-specific-T-cell response (Cohort 2, n = 54) over 6 months. Neutralization and T-cell responses were compared between paired samples at 2 time points, using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's multiple comparison test for continuous variables and McNemar's test for dichotomous variables. The Bonferroni method of p values adjustment for multiple comparison was applied. The third dose induced high neutralization of the wild-type virus and delta variant (geometric mean titer [GMT], 137.2 [95% CI, 84.8-221.9] and 80.6, [95% CI, 49.3-132.0], respectively), and to a lesser degree of the omicron variant (GMT, 10.3 [95% CI, 5.9-17.9]). At 6 months, serum neutralizing activity declined but was still high for the wild-type virus and for the delta variant (GMTs 38.1 [95% CI, 21.2-69.4], p = 0.011; and 28.9 [95% CI, 16.6-52.3], p = 0.022, respectively), but not for the omicron variant (GMT 5.9 [95% CI, 3.4-9.8], p = 0.463). The percentages of neutralizing sera against the wild-type virus, delta and omicron variants increased from 70%, 65%, and 38%, before the third dose, to 93% (p < 0.001), 88% (p < 0.001), and 48% (p = 0.021) at 3 weeks after, respectively; and remained high through the 6 months for the wild-type (80%, p = 0.06) and delta (77%, p = 0.102). The third dose induced the development of a sustained SARS-CoV-2-specific-T-cell population, which persisted through 6 months. The third BNT162b2 dose elicited a durable SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell response and induced effective and durable neutralization of the wild-type virus and the delta variant, and to a lesser degree of the omicron variant.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The durability of the immune response following the 3-dose BNT162b2 vaccination is unknown. The complexity of the situation is enhanced by the threat that highly transmissible variants may further accelerate the decline in the protection afforded by mRNA vaccines.
METHODS
One hundred and three 3-dose-vaccinated heart transplant recipients were longitudinally assessed for the kinetics of variant-specific neutralization (Cohort 1, n = 60) and SARS-CoV-2-specific-T-cell response (Cohort 2, n = 54) over 6 months. Neutralization and T-cell responses were compared between paired samples at 2 time points, using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's multiple comparison test for continuous variables and McNemar's test for dichotomous variables. The Bonferroni method of p values adjustment for multiple comparison was applied.
RESULTS
The third dose induced high neutralization of the wild-type virus and delta variant (geometric mean titer [GMT], 137.2 [95% CI, 84.8-221.9] and 80.6, [95% CI, 49.3-132.0], respectively), and to a lesser degree of the omicron variant (GMT, 10.3 [95% CI, 5.9-17.9]). At 6 months, serum neutralizing activity declined but was still high for the wild-type virus and for the delta variant (GMTs 38.1 [95% CI, 21.2-69.4], p = 0.011; and 28.9 [95% CI, 16.6-52.3], p = 0.022, respectively), but not for the omicron variant (GMT 5.9 [95% CI, 3.4-9.8], p = 0.463). The percentages of neutralizing sera against the wild-type virus, delta and omicron variants increased from 70%, 65%, and 38%, before the third dose, to 93% (p < 0.001), 88% (p < 0.001), and 48% (p = 0.021) at 3 weeks after, respectively; and remained high through the 6 months for the wild-type (80%, p = 0.06) and delta (77%, p = 0.102). The third dose induced the development of a sustained SARS-CoV-2-specific-T-cell population, which persisted through 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS
The third BNT162b2 dose elicited a durable SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell response and induced effective and durable neutralization of the wild-type virus and the delta variant, and to a lesser degree of the omicron variant.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35710484
pii: S1053-2498(22)01955-6
doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.05.014
pmc: PMC9128305
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
AIDS Vaccines
0
Antibodies, Viral
0
BCG Vaccine
0
COVID-19 Vaccines
0
Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine
0
Influenza Vaccines
0
Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine
0
Papillomavirus Vaccines
0
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines
0
SAIDS Vaccines
0
BNT162 Vaccine
N38TVC63NU
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1417-1425Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclosure statement None of the authors has a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of the presented manuscript or other conflicts of interest to disclose.
Références
Lancet. 2020 Aug 15;396(10249):467-478
pubmed: 32702298
Cell Rep Med. 2021 Jul 20;2(7):100355
pubmed: 34230917
N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 9;385(24):e84
pubmed: 34614326
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 10;383(24):2320-2332
pubmed: 32877576
N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 7;385(15):1393-1400
pubmed: 34525275
J Clin Invest. 2021 May 17;131(10):
pubmed: 33822770
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022 Feb;41(2):148-157
pubmed: 34565682
Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 Aug;110(8):1142-1149
pubmed: 34241676
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 31;383(27):2603-2615
pubmed: 33301246
JAMA. 2021 Jun 1;325(21):2204-2206
pubmed: 33950155
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021 Aug;40(8):759-762
pubmed: 34034958
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 15;383(16):1544-1555
pubmed: 32722908
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Aug 27;70(34):1163-1166
pubmed: 34437519
Lancet. 2021 Jan 9;397(10269):99-111
pubmed: 33306989
Cell Mol Immunol. 2021 Oct;18(10):2307-2312
pubmed: 34471260
Science. 2021 Apr 30;:
pubmed: 33931567
Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;27(1):
pubmed: 33261718
N Engl J Med. 2022 Feb 3;386(5):492-494
pubmed: 34965337
Clin Transl Immunology. 2021 Jul 26;10(7):e1319
pubmed: 34336207
Am J Transplant. 2021 Dec;21(12):3971-3979
pubmed: 34291552
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Aug 27;70(34):1167-1169
pubmed: 34437521
mBio. 2022 Apr 26;13(2):e0361721
pubmed: 35229637