A Retrospective Analysis of Respiratory Complications under General Anesthesia during EBUS-TBNA.
EBUS-TBNA
General anesthesia
Interventional pulmonology
Respiratory complications
Journal
Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives
ISSN: 2000-9666
Titre abrégé: J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101601396
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
17
09
2021
revised:
19
10
2021
accepted:
27
10
2021
entrez:
17
6
2022
pubmed:
18
6
2022
medline:
18
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
EBUS-TBNA is an established technique for diagnostically sampling intrathoracic masses and lymph nodes. While the procedure is commonly conducted under general anesthesia (GA), little is known regarding the association between anesthetic management and perioperative respiratory complications. Here, we aim to evaluate this association among patients presenting for EBUS-TBNA. 586 patients receiving GA for EBUS-TBNA between 2012 and 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of perioperative respiratory complications and the secondary endpoint was procedure end to OR exit time (minutes). Respiratory complications were defined as episodes of severe (SpO Among all patients, 79 (13.5%) had respiratory complications. Four patient characteristics were associated with respiratory complications: home oxygen use (OR 2.39; 95% CI 1.26-4.45; P = 0.007), pre-existing respiratory disease (OR 2.01; CI 1.21-3.29; P = 0.005), ASA class (P = 0.03), and albuterol administration intra-operatively (OR 2.22; CI 1.23-3.92; P = 0.007). No anesthetic factors were found to be statistically significant. Procedures with respiratory complications had a longer duration (mean time 88.7 min vs. 111.8 min; P = 0.00009), prolonged time to extubation (mean time 11.9 min vs. 14.2 min; P = 0.039), and stayed in the room longer after extubation (mean time 18.4 min vs. 23.1 min; P = 0.0016). When comparing types of GA, there were no significant differences between volatile anesthetics versus TIVA (12.7% vs. 14.6%, P = 0.54). Pre-existing patient characteristics, as opposed to anesthetic factors, are associated with respiratory complications during EBUS-TBNA.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
EBUS-TBNA is an established technique for diagnostically sampling intrathoracic masses and lymph nodes. While the procedure is commonly conducted under general anesthesia (GA), little is known regarding the association between anesthetic management and perioperative respiratory complications. Here, we aim to evaluate this association among patients presenting for EBUS-TBNA.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
586 patients receiving GA for EBUS-TBNA between 2012 and 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of perioperative respiratory complications and the secondary endpoint was procedure end to OR exit time (minutes). Respiratory complications were defined as episodes of severe (SpO
Results
UNASSIGNED
Among all patients, 79 (13.5%) had respiratory complications. Four patient characteristics were associated with respiratory complications: home oxygen use (OR 2.39; 95% CI 1.26-4.45; P = 0.007), pre-existing respiratory disease (OR 2.01; CI 1.21-3.29; P = 0.005), ASA class (P = 0.03), and albuterol administration intra-operatively (OR 2.22; CI 1.23-3.92; P = 0.007). No anesthetic factors were found to be statistically significant. Procedures with respiratory complications had a longer duration (mean time 88.7 min vs. 111.8 min; P = 0.00009), prolonged time to extubation (mean time 11.9 min vs. 14.2 min; P = 0.039), and stayed in the room longer after extubation (mean time 18.4 min vs. 23.1 min; P = 0.0016). When comparing types of GA, there were no significant differences between volatile anesthetics versus TIVA (12.7% vs. 14.6%, P = 0.54).
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
Pre-existing patient characteristics, as opposed to anesthetic factors, are associated with respiratory complications during EBUS-TBNA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35711857
doi: 10.55729/2000-9666.1003
pii: jchimp-12-01-019
pmc: PMC9195124
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
19-27Informations de copyright
© 2022 Greater Baltimore Medical Center.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflcits of interest None related to this work.
Références
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2020 Jan;27(1):22-29
pubmed: 31206389
Endosc Ultrasound. 2017 Jul-Aug;6(4):257-263
pubmed: 28663531
Chest. 2004 Jan;125(1):322-5
pubmed: 14718460
Anesth Analg. 2001 May;92(5):1094-102
pubmed: 11323328
Respir Res. 2013 May 10;14:50
pubmed: 23663438
J Thorac Oncol. 2008 Jun;3(6):577-82
pubmed: 18520794
Lung. 2014 Dec;192(6):905-13
pubmed: 24972639
Br J Anaesth. 2000 Oct;85(4):533-40
pubmed: 11064610
Chest. 2016 Mar;149(3):816-35
pubmed: 26402427
Respir Care. 2015 Apr;60(4):567-76
pubmed: 25492957
Chest. 2013 Apr;143(4):1151-1162
pubmed: 23546490
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011 Jan;55(1):75-81
pubmed: 21039356
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Jun;143(6):1324-9
pubmed: 22341424
Chest. 2010 Jul;138(1):165-70
pubmed: 20363846
Anaesthesia. 2018 Jan;73 Suppl 1:25-33
pubmed: 29313906
Clin Respir J. 2017 Nov;11(6):935-941
pubmed: 26720178
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Oct 1;39(21):1758-64
pubmed: 25010093
Chest. 2011 Dec;140(6):1557-1566
pubmed: 21659432
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2010 Oct;17(4):329-33
pubmed: 23168954
BMJ. 1998 Sep 26;317(7162):871-4
pubmed: 9748190
Anesth Analg. 2004 Mar;98(3):632-41, table of contents
pubmed: 14980911
Respiration. 2016;92(3):166-75
pubmed: 27598398
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Feb 25;3:8
pubmed: 18298864
Respiration. 2014;88(3):244-50
pubmed: 25170748
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Feb;96(7):e6148
pubmed: 28207547
Chest. 2013 May;143(5 Suppl):7S-37S
pubmed: 23649434
Arch Bronconeumol. 2016 Jan;52(1):5-11
pubmed: 26071369
J Anesth. 2014 Oct;28(5):721-6
pubmed: 24557087
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2017 Jan;24(1):7-14
pubmed: 27984382
J Thorac Dis. 2014 Jun;6(6):742-51
pubmed: 24976998
Chest. 2013 Apr;143(4):1044-1053
pubmed: 23117878
Anesthesiology. 2019 Jun;130(6):1064-1077
pubmed: 30998510
Thorax. 2009 Sep;64(9):757-62
pubmed: 19454408
Respirol Case Rep. 2019 Nov 07;8(1):e00497
pubmed: 31719985
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Dec;142(6):1393-400.e1
pubmed: 21963329
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2012 Apr;24(2):127-32
pubmed: 22089326
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Apr 1;191(7):796-803
pubmed: 25574801
Anesthesiology. 1996 Nov;85(5):977-87
pubmed: 8916813
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2015 Jul;22(3):226-36
pubmed: 26165893
Lancet. 1995 Jun 3;345(8962):1387-91
pubmed: 7760608
Minerva Anestesiol. 2019 Jul;85(7):756-762
pubmed: 30938120
BMC Pulm Med. 2018 Jan 9;18(1):4
pubmed: 29316890
BMJ. 2018 Oct 24;363:k4169
pubmed: 30355567