Methods in food defence: a simple and robust screening for 16 rodenticides by LC-DAD/FLD following QuEChERS-based extraction.
Food defence
LC-DAD
LC-FLD
QuEChERS
Rodenticides
Journal
Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry
ISSN: 1618-2650
Titre abrégé: Anal Bioanal Chem
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101134327
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2022
Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
08
03
2022
accepted:
19
05
2022
revised:
29
04
2022
pubmed:
18
6
2022
medline:
22
7
2022
entrez:
17
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Fortunately, the intentional contamination of food or water supplies out of criminal or terroristic motivation is a rather rare event. However, in the face of asymmetric warfare and as the consequences of such an event would be severe, food defence as a necessary supplement to food safety is gaining increased attention. While some progress has been made in developing non-target detection devices, the contamination of food or water supplies using readily available rodenticides may still be revealed only by complex analytical techniques. The presented study therefore aimed to develop a quick and easy screening method for the detection of sixteen globally common rodenticides in foodstuffs. Robust operation with limited personnel and analytical resources were one benchmark to be met by the method, which uses a slightly modified QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, safe) protocol for dispersive solid-phase extraction and subsequent ion-pair chromatography with diode-array and fluorescence detection. Quantification limits were as low as 5 µg/kg with satisfying bias (recovery) and repeatability rates of 77 to 117% and 1.8 to 17.1%, respectively. The developed method provides reliable and robust detection of these deadly poisons at toxic concentrations, which was demonstrated impressively in an improvised assault scenario.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35715587
doi: 10.1007/s00216-022-04145-w
pii: 10.1007/s00216-022-04145-w
pmc: PMC9293804
doi:
Substances chimiques
Rodenticides
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5829-5836Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
J AOAC Int. 2020 Jun 1;103(3):770-778
pubmed: 33241367
Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2019 Dec 1;70(4):232-255
pubmed: 32623862
J Agric Food Chem. 2007 Feb 7;55(3):571-6
pubmed: 17263443
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2021 Dec 1;1186:123005
pubmed: 34741935
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2012 Mar;24(2):307-11
pubmed: 22379046
J Chromatogr. 1983 Nov 18;270:277-83
pubmed: 6655020
Toxicol Rev. 2005;24(4):259-69
pubmed: 16499407
J AOAC Int. 2003 Mar-Apr;86(2):412-31
pubmed: 12723926
J Food Sci. 2011 Nov-Dec;76(9):R157-63
pubmed: 22416717
Forensic Sci Int. 2014 Nov;244:63-9
pubmed: 25195128
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2007 May;25(2):549-66; abstract xi
pubmed: 17482032
J Anal Toxicol. 2010 Jun;34(5):273-9
pubmed: 20529461
J Phys Chem A. 2015 Feb 26;119(8):1404-14
pubmed: 25629727
J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 1999 Aug 6;731(1):155-65
pubmed: 10492002
J Sep Sci. 2013 Aug;36(16):2593-601
pubmed: 23733735
J Food Sci. 2016 Apr;81(4):R823-34
pubmed: 26934423
J Anal Toxicol. 1995 Nov-Dec;19(7):557-62
pubmed: 8577178
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016 Jun;1374(1):111-22
pubmed: 27244102
J Environ Sci Health B. 2016 Nov;51(11):801-8
pubmed: 27428755
Ecotoxicology. 2021 Jul;30(5):767-782
pubmed: 33864551
J Anal Toxicol. 2010 Mar;34(2):95-102
pubmed: 20223102
Forensic Sci Int. 2015 Aug;253:94-102
pubmed: 26115225