Can an online expressive writing program support people with inflammatory bowel disease? A feasibility randomised controlled trial.


Journal

Complementary therapies in clinical practice
ISSN: 1873-6947
Titre abrégé: Complement Ther Clin Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101225531

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2022
Historique:
received: 21 02 2022
revised: 17 05 2022
accepted: 01 06 2022
pubmed: 19 6 2022
medline: 7 7 2022
entrez: 18 6 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

We explored feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of an online writing intervention (WriteforIBD) against an active control condition for distress in people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) at the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. A feasibility RCT was conducted in 19 adults (89.5% female, aged 20-69 years) with IBD and mild-moderate distress. Participants allocated to the WriteForIBD group completed a 4-day 30-min writing program adapted for IBD. The active control group wrote about trivial topics provided by researchers. Feasibility was established based on the recruitment and retention while acceptability based on completion rates and a numeric rating scale. All participants completed measures of mental health and disease activity before and after the intervention (one week) and at follow-up three months after the study commencement. The retention rate in the study was high (100% WriteForIBD; 82% control). All participants attended every session. 84.2% of participants were satisfied with the intervention. All participants reported a significant improvement in IBD-Control immediately after the intervention; F (2, 33.7) = 7.641, p = .002. A significant interaction of group*time for resilience was noted, R Online expressive writing is potentially feasible and highly acceptable to people with IBD who report distress. Future large-scale trials should explore the intervention that is adapted from this feasibility study. ID: ACTRN12620000448943p.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
We explored feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of an online writing intervention (WriteforIBD) against an active control condition for distress in people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) at the time of the COVID-19 pandemic.
METHODS METHODS
A feasibility RCT was conducted in 19 adults (89.5% female, aged 20-69 years) with IBD and mild-moderate distress. Participants allocated to the WriteForIBD group completed a 4-day 30-min writing program adapted for IBD. The active control group wrote about trivial topics provided by researchers. Feasibility was established based on the recruitment and retention while acceptability based on completion rates and a numeric rating scale. All participants completed measures of mental health and disease activity before and after the intervention (one week) and at follow-up three months after the study commencement.
RESULTS RESULTS
The retention rate in the study was high (100% WriteForIBD; 82% control). All participants attended every session. 84.2% of participants were satisfied with the intervention. All participants reported a significant improvement in IBD-Control immediately after the intervention; F (2, 33.7) = 7.641, p = .002. A significant interaction of group*time for resilience was noted, R
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Online expressive writing is potentially feasible and highly acceptable to people with IBD who report distress. Future large-scale trials should explore the intervention that is adapted from this feasibility study.
REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
ID: ACTRN12620000448943p.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35716442
pii: S1744-3881(22)00084-6
doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2022.101616
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Pagination

101616

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

David Skvarc (D)

School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.

Subhadra Evans (S)

School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.

Suiyin Cheah (S)

School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.

Madeleine Cranney (M)

School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.

Bonnie German (B)

School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.

Rebecca Orr (R)

School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia; iMPACT, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.

Catherine Emerson (C)

School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.

Lisa Olive (L)

School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia; iMPACT, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.

Lauren Beswick (L)

Department of Gastroenterology, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.

Wayne Massuger (W)

Crohn's & Colitis Australia, Melbourne, Australia.

Leanne Raven (L)

Crohn's & Colitis Australia, Melbourne, Australia.

Antonina Mikocka-Walus (A)

School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address: mikocka@deakin.edu.au.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH