Feasibility of a Single Pigtail Stent Made by Cutting a Nasobiliary Drainage Tube in Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Stenting for Acute Cholecystitis.

cholecystitis drainage endoscopy gallbladder stents

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2022
Historique:
accepted: 16 05 2022
entrez: 20 6 2022
pubmed: 21 6 2022
medline: 21 6 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Background and objective In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single pigtail stent made by cutting a nasobiliary drainage tube (NBD stent) by comparing the clinical outcomes of using an NBD stent and those of using a ready-made double pigtail stent (RDP stent) in endoscopic gallbladder stenting (EGBS) for acute cholecystitis. Materials and methods This was a single-center retrospective study involving 20 cases that had technical success with EGBS for acute cholecystitis; the patients were divided into two groups: those using NBD stent (NBD group) and those using RDP stent (RDP group). The baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results There were 13 patients in the NBD group and seven in the RDP group. The rates of clinical success (NBD group: 92% vs. RDP group: 100%, p=0.45) did not differ significantly between the groups. Regarding adverse events, gallbladder perforation occurred in one case in the NBD group; however, no other adverse events occurred in either group (NBD group: 7.7% vs. RDP group: 0%, p=0.45). The stent patency periods did not differ significantly between the groups [NBD group: 43 (12-64) days vs. RDP group: 97 (58-215) days, p=0.17]. The stent patency period in cases of long-term stent placement after EGBS was 1,381 days and 1,579 days in the NBD group and 305 days in the RDP group, respectively. Conclusion NBD stents are considered as effective as RDP stents in EGBS for acute cholecystitis. They are highly versatile and can be used for both bridging to surgery and long-term stent placement.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35719771
doi: 10.7759/cureus.25072
pmc: PMC9202489
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e25072

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022, Takahashi et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Feb;89(2):289-298
pubmed: 30213575
Dig Endosc. 2018 Jul;30(4):501-507
pubmed: 29399891
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):73-86
pubmed: 29095575
Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5200-5208
pubmed: 27059975
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):446-54
pubmed: 20189503
Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Sep;68(3):455-60
pubmed: 18561927
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):55-72
pubmed: 29045062
Endosc Ultrasound. 2021 Nov-Dec;10(6):448-454
pubmed: 34782492
Ann Gastroenterol. 2020 Jul-Aug;33(4):391-397
pubmed: 32624660
HPB (Oxford). 2020 Jul;22(7):996-1003
pubmed: 31685380
BMC Surg. 2021 Apr 7;21(1):184
pubmed: 33827521
Endosc Int Open. 2019 Sep;7(9):E1105-E1114
pubmed: 31475227

Auteurs

Koji Takahashi (K)

Gastroenterology, Chiba University, Chiba, JPN.

Hiroshi Ohyama (H)

Gastroenterology, Chiba University, Chiba, JPN.

Mayu Ouchi (M)

Gastroenterology, Chiba University, Chiba, JPN.

Motoyasu Kan (M)

Gastroenterology, Chiba University, Chiba, JPN.

Hiroki Nagashima (H)

Gastroenterology, Chiba University, Chiba, JPN.

Yotaro Iino (Y)

Gastroenterology, Chiba University, Chiba, JPN.

Yuko Kusakabe (Y)

Gastroenterology, Chiba University, Chiba, JPN.

Kohichiroh Okitsu (K)

Gastroenterology, Chiba University, Chiba, JPN.

Izumi Ohno (I)

Medical Oncology, Chiba University, Chiba, JPN.

Yuichi Takiguchi (Y)

Medical Oncology, Chiba University, Chiba, JPN.

Naoya Kato (N)

Gastroenterology, Chiba University, Chiba, JPN.

Classifications MeSH