How Do Orthopaedic Patients Prefer to Be Contacted During a Pandemic?

communication in healthcare communication technology covid-19 pandemic elective orthopaedic surgery patient’s satisfaction survey

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2022
Historique:
accepted: 16 05 2022
entrez: 20 6 2022
pubmed: 21 6 2022
medline: 21 6 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Introduction Communication with patients is a vital part of the surgical pathway, and when done effectively, it can greatly improve patient outcomes and patient satisfaction and reduce canceled appointments. Different forms of communication work well for different patient demographics, and it is important to optimize communication techniques. We designed a study to review the communication preferences of orthopedic patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods A cross-sectional study was performed by asking patients who were due to undergo orthopedic procedures to answer a questionnaire on their communication preferences, the reminder notice period for appointments, and safety and satisfaction ratings during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results Communication method preferences are influenced by patient factors such as gender and age. Phone calls were the most popular communication method throughout all patient groups, with 61% selecting it as their preference. Younger patients preferred multiple communication methods of phone calls, texts, and emails, whereas the older group had a stronger preference for letters. Letters were more popular among females (28% compared to 10% of males), whereas males had a stronger preference for other communication methods. The majority of patients said they would not have liked a letter prior to their clinic appointment (65%). Of those who indicated a preferred notice period, 73% would have liked five days or less notice prior to their clinic appointment, while 65% would have liked 10-14 days notice prior to their surgery. The average safety rating was 55%. The overall satisfaction rating with the communication process was 71.7%. Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic has changed patient feelings towards healthcare and, as a result, changed the way healthcare is delivered. Communication method preferences among trauma and orthopedic patients vary and depend on factors such as gender and age. If healthcare departments can optimize their communication processes, they will improve their patient outcomes and enhance their resources.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35719814
doi: 10.7759/cureus.25049
pmc: PMC9200212
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e25049

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022, Fellows et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

J Arthroplasty. 2019 Mar;34(3):456-461
pubmed: 30594339
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Dec 1;27(12):719-725
pubmed: 33787563
Health Psychol. 1986;5(6):581-94
pubmed: 3803351
Adv Psychosom Med. 2015;34:10-23
pubmed: 25832510
Tech Innov Gastrointest Endosc. 2021;23(3):234-243
pubmed: 34007972
Soc Sci Med. 1995 Apr;40(7):903-18
pubmed: 7792630
J Periodontol. 2006 Apr;77(4):678-83
pubmed: 16584350
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jan;27(1-2):288-305
pubmed: 28544205
Ir J Med Sci. 2021 Feb;190(1):291-296
pubmed: 32683604
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Aug;100(8):1473-1481
pubmed: 28302341
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Aug 1;45(15):1073-1080
pubmed: 32675615
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2017 Sep 04;5(1):20
pubmed: 29881740
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 24;17(19):
pubmed: 32987712
Cureus. 2020 Nov 11;12(11):e11431
pubmed: 33324514
AORN J. 2017 Apr;105(4):384-391
pubmed: 28336027
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 23;20(1):60
pubmed: 31973765
J Fam Pract. 2000 Sep;49(9):796-804
pubmed: 11032203
J Patient Exp. 2021 Mar 3;8:2374373521998839
pubmed: 34179403
Angle Orthod. 2018 May;88(3):314-318
pubmed: 29376734
Allergy. 2021 Mar;76(3):648-676
pubmed: 32531110
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2017 Feb;56(2):140-145
pubmed: 27207867
Public Health Res Pract. 2020 Jun 30;30(2):
pubmed: 32601651
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Apr 18;9(4):
pubmed: 33919519
Arthroplast Today. 2021 Oct;11:113-121
pubmed: 34493982
Anesthesiology. 2019 Feb;130(2):192-202
pubmed: 30688782
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2021 Jan;6(1):15-23
pubmed: 33084491
Aten Primaria. 2021 Dec;53 Suppl 1:102222
pubmed: 34961582
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2021 Jul;9(4):379-386
pubmed: 34423084
Am Fam Physician. 2017 Jan 1;95(1):29-34
pubmed: 28075109
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Oct;113:213-217
pubmed: 30173988

Auteurs

David Fellows (D)

Trauma and Orthopaedics, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, GBR.

Jamie Hind (J)

Trauma and Orthopaedics, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, GBR.

Gur Aziz Singh Sidhu (GAS)

Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Burton-on-Trent, GBR.

Veda Vani Amara (VV)

Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Burton-on-Trent, GBR.

Neil Ashwood (N)

Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Burton-on-Trent, GBR.

Classifications MeSH