A Genetic Association Test Accounting for Skewed X-Inactivation With Application to Biotherapy Immunogenicity in Patients With Autoimmune Diseases.

X-chromosome additive hazard model anti-drug antibodies autoimmune disease biotherapy immunogenicity skewed X-Chromosome inactivation

Journal

Frontiers in medicine
ISSN: 2296-858X
Titre abrégé: Front Med (Lausanne)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101648047

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 17 01 2022
accepted: 20 04 2022
entrez: 20 6 2022
pubmed: 21 6 2022
medline: 21 6 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Despite being assayed on commercialized DNA chips, the X chromosome is commonly excluded from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). One of the reasons is the complexity to analyze the data taking into account the X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) process in women and in particular the XCI process with a potentially skewed pattern. This is the case when investigating the role of X-linked genetic variants in the occurrence of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) in patients with autoimmune diseases treated by biotherapies. In this context, we propose a novel test statistic for selecting loci of interest harbored by the X chromosome that are associated with time-to-event data taking into account skewed X-inactivation (XCI-S). The proposed statistic relies on a semi-parametric additive hazard model and is straightforward to implement. Results from the simulation study show that the test provides higher power gains than the score tests from the Cox model (under XCI process or its escape) and the Xu et al.'s XCI-S likelihood ratio test. We applied the test to the data from the real-world observational multicohort study set-up by the IMI-funded ABIRISK consortium for identifying X chromosome susceptibility loci for drug immunogenicity in patients with autoimmune diseases treated by biotherapies. The test allowed us to select two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with high linkage disequilibrium (rs5991366 and rs5991394) located in the cytoband Xp22.2 that would have been overlooked by the Cox score tests and the Xu et al.'s XCI-S likelihood ratio test. Both SNPs showed a similar protective effect for drug immunogenicity without any occurrence of ADA positivity for the homozygous females and hemizygous males for the alternative allele. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the association between X chromosome loci and the occurrence of anti-drug antibodies. We think that more X-Chromosome GWAS should be performed and that the test is well-suited for identifying X-Chromosome SNPs, while taking into account all patterns of the skewed X-Chromosome inactivation process.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35721087
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.856917
pmc: PMC9199462
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

856917

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Hässler, Camilleri-Broët, Allez, Deisenhammer, Fogdell-Hahn, Mariette, Pallardy and Broët.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The handling editor EJ declared a past co-authorship with the author SH.

Références

PLoS Med. 2020 Oct 30;17(10):e1003348
pubmed: 33125391
Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Mar;27(3):455-465
pubmed: 30552425
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019 Oct 22;7:241
pubmed: 31696116
Biostatistics. 2008 Oct;9(4):593-600
pubmed: 18441336
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 May 14;21(10):
pubmed: 32423094
Bioinformatics. 2005 Mar 1;21(5):660-8
pubmed: 15479710
Nat Genet. 2013 Jun;45(6):580-5
pubmed: 23715323
JCI Insight. 2019 Apr 4;4(7):
pubmed: 30944248
Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Sep;81(3):559-75
pubmed: 17701901
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 May;29(5):1305-1314
pubmed: 31258049
Bioinformatics. 2015 Nov 1;31(21):3555-7
pubmed: 26139635
EMBO Mol Med. 2014 Oct 22;6(11):1423-35
pubmed: 25339185
BioDrugs. 2016 Jun;30(3):195-206
pubmed: 27097915
Oncogene. 2003 May 15;22(19):2920-5
pubmed: 12771942
Oncogene. 2004 Jul 22;23(33):5607-15
pubmed: 15184881
Cell Rep. 2020 Dec 8;33(10):108485
pubmed: 33296655
J Clin Invest. 2008 Jan;118(1):20-3
pubmed: 18097476
Nat Rev Genet. 2019 Mar;20(3):173-190
pubmed: 30581192
Am J Hum Genet. 2013 May 2;92(5):643-7
pubmed: 23643377
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Apr 5;113(14):E2029-38
pubmed: 27001848
Genet Epidemiol. 2007 Dec;31(8):834-43
pubmed: 17549761
Genet Epidemiol. 2018 Feb;42(1):80-94
pubmed: 29178618
J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10
pubmed: 2231712

Auteurs

Signe Hässler (S)

INSERM UMR 959, Immunology-Immunopathology-Immunotherapy (i3), Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Biotherapy (CIC-BTi), Paris, France.

Sophie Camilleri-Broët (S)

OPTILAB-MUHC, Division of Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Matthieu Allez (M)

Department of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP, Université Paris-Diderot, Paris, France.

Florian Deisenhammer (F)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Anna Fogdell-Hahn (A)

Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Xavier Mariette (X)

Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM UMR1184, Center for Immunology of Viral Infections and Autoimmune Diseases, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.

Marc Pallardy (M)

Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM, Inflammation, Microbiome, Immunosurveillance, Châtenay-Malabry, France.

Philippe Broët (P)

University Paris-Saclay, CESP, INSERM, AP-HP, Université Paris-Sud, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France.

Classifications MeSH