Invasive Hemodynamic Assessment and Procedural Success of Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Repair-Important Factors for Right Ventricular Remodeling and Outcome.

Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common condition promoting right heart failure and is associated with a poor long-term prognosis. Transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVR) emerged as a low-risk alternative to surgical repair techniques. However, patient selection remains controversial, particularly regarding the benefits of TTVR in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). We aimed to investigate the impact of preprocedural invasive hemodynamic assessment and procedural success on right ventricular (RV) remodeling and outcome. All patients undergoing TTVR with a TR reduction of ≥1 grade without precapillary or combined PH [mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) ≥25 mmHg, mean pulmonary artery Wedge pressure ≤ 15 mmHg, pulmonary vascular resistance ≥3 Wood units] were assigned to the responder group. All patients with a TR reduction of ≥1 grade and precapillary or combined PH were classified as non-responders. Patients with a TR reduction ≥2 grade were directly classified as responders, and patients without TR reduction were directly assigned as non-responders. A total of 107 patients were enrolled, 75 were classified as responders and 32 as non-responders. We observed evidence of significant RV reverse remodeling in responders with a decrease in RV diameters (-2.9 mm, Hemodynamic assessment before TTVR and procedural success are significant factors for patient prognosis. The hemodynamic profiling prior to intervention is an essential component in patient selection for TTVR. The window for edge-to-edge TTVR might be limited, but timely intervention is an important factor for a better outcome and successful right ventricular reverse remodeling.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Dannenberg, Koschutnik, Donà, Nitsche, Mascherbauer, Heitzinger, Halavina, Kammerlander, Spinka, Winter, Andreas, Mach, Schneider, Bartunek, Bartko, Hengstenberg, Mascherbauer and Goliasch.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

VD received consulting fees from Abbott, and educational grants from Edwards Lifesciences. JM received proctor fees from Abbott, consulting fees from Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, Shockwave Medical, and educational grants from Edwards Lifesciences. CH received proctor fees from Edwards Lifesciences and Boston Scientific, Educational grants from Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. MA received proctor/speaker/consulting fees from Abbott, Edwards, and Medtronic and institutional research funding (Edwards, Abbott, Medtronic, LSI). The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.