Advantages of peripheral blood stem cells from unrelated donors versus bone marrow transplants in outcomes of adult acute myeloid leukemia patients.


Journal

Cytotherapy
ISSN: 1477-2566
Titre abrégé: Cytotherapy
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100895309

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2022
Historique:
received: 09 02 2022
revised: 17 05 2022
accepted: 20 05 2022
pubmed: 22 6 2022
medline: 14 9 2022
entrez: 21 6 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In allogeneic stem cell transplantation, unrelated donors are chosen in cases where appropriate related donors are not available. Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are more often selected as a graft source than bone marrow (BM). However, the prognostic benefits of PBSCs versus BM transplants from unrelated donors have not been carefully examined in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This study compared outcomes of adult AML patients who underwent unrelated PBSC and BM transplantation, evaluating post-transplant complications, including engraftment, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and infections, and determined subgroups of patients who are most likely to benefit from unrelated PBSCs compared with BM transplants. The authors analyzed 2962 adult AML patients who underwent unrelated PBSC or BM transplants between 2011 and 2018 (221 PBSC and 2741 BM) using the Japanese nationwide registry database, in which graft source selection is not skewed toward PBSCs. In 49.7% of patients, disease status at transplantation was first complete remission (CR1). In 57.1% of cases, HLA-matched donors were selected. Myeloablative conditioning was performed in 75.1% of cases, and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) was added to conditioning in 10.5%. Multivariate analyses showed a trend toward favorable non-relapse mortality (NRM) in PBSC recipients compared with BM recipients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.731, P = 0.096), whereas overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.959, P = 0.230) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR, 0.868, P = 0.221) were comparable between PBSC and BM recipients. Although the rate of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was significantly higher in PBSC patients (HR, 1.367, P = 0.016), NRM was not increased, mainly as a result of significantly reduced risk of bacterial infections (HR, 0.618, P = 0.010), reflecting more prompt engraftments in PBSC recipients. Subgroup analyses revealed that PBSC transplantation was advantageous in patients transplanted at CR1 and in those without ATG use. PBSC recipients experienced significantly better OS and/or DFS compared with BM recipients in this patient group. The authors' results confirmed the overall safety of unrelated PBSC transplantation for adult AML patients and suggested an advantage of PBSCs, especially for those in CR1. Further optimization of the prophylactic strategy for cGVHD is required to improve the overall outcome in transplantation from unrelated PBSC donors.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AIMS
In allogeneic stem cell transplantation, unrelated donors are chosen in cases where appropriate related donors are not available. Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are more often selected as a graft source than bone marrow (BM). However, the prognostic benefits of PBSCs versus BM transplants from unrelated donors have not been carefully examined in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This study compared outcomes of adult AML patients who underwent unrelated PBSC and BM transplantation, evaluating post-transplant complications, including engraftment, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and infections, and determined subgroups of patients who are most likely to benefit from unrelated PBSCs compared with BM transplants.
METHODS
The authors analyzed 2962 adult AML patients who underwent unrelated PBSC or BM transplants between 2011 and 2018 (221 PBSC and 2741 BM) using the Japanese nationwide registry database, in which graft source selection is not skewed toward PBSCs.
RESULTS
In 49.7% of patients, disease status at transplantation was first complete remission (CR1). In 57.1% of cases, HLA-matched donors were selected. Myeloablative conditioning was performed in 75.1% of cases, and anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) was added to conditioning in 10.5%. Multivariate analyses showed a trend toward favorable non-relapse mortality (NRM) in PBSC recipients compared with BM recipients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.731, P = 0.096), whereas overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.959, P = 0.230) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR, 0.868, P = 0.221) were comparable between PBSC and BM recipients. Although the rate of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was significantly higher in PBSC patients (HR, 1.367, P = 0.016), NRM was not increased, mainly as a result of significantly reduced risk of bacterial infections (HR, 0.618, P = 0.010), reflecting more prompt engraftments in PBSC recipients. Subgroup analyses revealed that PBSC transplantation was advantageous in patients transplanted at CR1 and in those without ATG use. PBSC recipients experienced significantly better OS and/or DFS compared with BM recipients in this patient group.
CONCLUSIONS
The authors' results confirmed the overall safety of unrelated PBSC transplantation for adult AML patients and suggested an advantage of PBSCs, especially for those in CR1. Further optimization of the prophylactic strategy for cGVHD is required to improve the overall outcome in transplantation from unrelated PBSC donors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35729020
pii: S1465-3249(22)00674-0
doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2022.05.009
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antilymphocyte Serum 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1013-1025

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no commercial, proprietary or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.

Auteurs

Tomoyasu Jo (T)

Department of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Center for Research and Application of Cellular Therapy, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.

Yasuyuki Arai (Y)

Department of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Center for Research and Application of Cellular Therapy, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan. Electronic address: ysykrai@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.

Tadakazu Kondo (T)

Department of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Shohei Mizuno (S)

Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Japan.

Shigeki Hirabayashi (S)

Division of Precision Medicine, Kyusyu University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.

Yoshihiro Inamoto (Y)

Department of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Noriko Doki (N)

Hematology Division, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Tokyo, Japan.

Takahiro Fukuda (T)

Department of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Yukiyasu Ozawa (Y)

Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya First Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.

Yuta Katayama (Y)

Department of Hematology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb Survivors Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.

Yoshinobu Kanda (Y)

Division of Hematology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.

Kentaro Fukushima (K)

Department of Hematology and Oncology, Osaka University Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

Ken-Ichi Matsuoka (KI)

Department of Hematology and Oncology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.

Satoru Takada (S)

Leukemia Research Center, Saiseikai Maebashi Hospital, Maebashi, Japan.

Masashi Sawa (M)

Department of Hematology and Oncology, Anjo Kosei Hospital, Anjo, Japan.

Takashi Ashida (T)

Division of Hematology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kindai University Hospital, Osakasayama, Japan.

Makoto Onizuka (M)

Department of Hematology/Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.

Tatsuo Ichinohe (T)

Department of Hematology and Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.

Yoshiko Atsuta (Y)

Japanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Nagoya, Japan; Department of Registry Science for Transplant and Cellular Therapy, Aichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagakute, Japan.

Junya Kanda (J)

Department of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Masamitsu Yanada (M)

Department of Hematology and Cell Therapy, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH