molar
primary
pulpectomy
rotary
Journal
Frontiers in bioscience (Elite edition)
ISSN: 1945-0508
Titre abrégé: Front Biosci (Elite Ed)
Pays: Singapore
ID NLM: 101485240
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 06 2022
02 06 2022
Historique:
received:
01
08
2021
revised:
21
01
2022
accepted:
24
01
2022
entrez:
22
6
2022
pubmed:
23
6
2022
medline:
24
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Considering the advantages of rotary files in instrumenting the root canals of permanent teeth and a lack of adequate data on the use of these systems in primary teeth, the present study aimed to evaluate two rotary files and compare them with hand files in the cleaning efficacy of the root canals of primary molar teeth. In the present study, three groups of teeth were prepared with Kedo-S paediatric rotary file system, RaCe (reamer with alternating cutting edges), and hand files (n = 40). The groups were evaluated under a stereomicroscope concerning the cleaning efficacy of the files after cleaning the teeth in the apical, middle, and coronal thirds. The data were analyzed with SPSS 24 (IBM Corporation, USA, 2016) using Fisher's exact test and chi-squared test; statistical significance was set at There were no significant differences in the apical and middle thirds between the different study groups. However, there were significant differences in the coronal third between the hand file and Kedo-S ( The present study showed that Kedo-S files were more effective than RaCe and hand files in the coronal area than the hand and RaCe files.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Considering the advantages of rotary files in instrumenting the root canals of permanent teeth and a lack of adequate data on the use of these systems in primary teeth, the present study aimed to evaluate two rotary files and compare them with hand files in the cleaning efficacy of the root canals of primary molar teeth.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In the present study, three groups of teeth were prepared with Kedo-S paediatric rotary file system, RaCe (reamer with alternating cutting edges), and hand files (n = 40). The groups were evaluated under a stereomicroscope concerning the cleaning efficacy of the files after cleaning the teeth in the apical, middle, and coronal thirds. The data were analyzed with SPSS 24 (IBM Corporation, USA, 2016) using Fisher's exact test and chi-squared test; statistical significance was set at
RESULTS
There were no significant differences in the apical and middle thirds between the different study groups. However, there were significant differences in the coronal third between the hand file and Kedo-S (
CONCLUSIONS
The present study showed that Kedo-S files were more effective than RaCe and hand files in the coronal area than the hand and RaCe files.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35730455
pii: S1945-0494(22)00077-7
doi: 10.31083/j.fbe1402014
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
14Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest. LT is serving as one of the Editorial Board members of this journal. We declare that LT had no involvement in the peer review of this article and has no access to information regarding its peer review. Full responsibility for the editorial process for this article was delegated to MG.