Spatial variations in family planning demand to limit childbearing and the demand satisfied with modern methods in sub-Saharan Africa.
Demand satisfied
Fertility-limiting behavior, geographical distribution
Spatial analysis, Family planning
Journal
Reproductive health
ISSN: 1742-4755
Titre abrégé: Reprod Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101224380
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Jun 2022
22 Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
21
06
2021
accepted:
31
05
2022
entrez:
22
6
2022
pubmed:
23
6
2022
medline:
25
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There is an increasing demand for family planning to limit childbearing in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). However, limited studies have quantified the spatial variations. This study examined: (i) the spatial patterns in the demand for family planning to limit childbearing and satisfied with modern methods, and (ii) the correlates of the demand for family planning to limit childbearing satisfied with modern methods in SSA. This study analyzed secondary data on 306,080 married/in-union women obtained from Demographic Health Surveys conducted between 2010 and 2019 in 33 sub-Saharan African countries. We conducted exploratory spatial data analysis, with countries as the unit of analysis. We also performed regression analysis to determine the factors associated with demand for family planning to limit childbearing satisfied with modern methods in SSA. The mean percentage of women who demanded for family planning to limit childbearing by country was 20.5% while the mean prevalence of demand for family planning to limit childbearing satisfied with modern methods by country was 46.5%. There was a significant positive global spatial autocorrelation in the demand for family planning to limit childbearing (global Moran's I = 0.3, p = 0.001). The cluster map showed the concentration of cold spots (low-low clusters) in western and central Africa (WCA), while hot spots (high-high clusters) were concentrated in eastern and southern Africa (ESA). Also, the demand for family planning to limit childbearing satisfied with modern methods showed significant positive global spatial autocorrelation (global Moran's I = 0.2, p = 0.004) and concentration of cold spots in WCA. In the final multivariable regression model the joint family planning decision making (β = 0.34, p < 0.001), and antenatal care (β = 13.98, p < 0.001) were the significant factors associated with the demand for family planning to limit childbearing satisfied by modern methods. There are significant spatial variations in the demand for family planning to limit childbearing and the demand satisfied by modern methods, with cold spots concentrated in WCA. Promoting joint decision making by partners and increasing uptake of antenatal care may improve the demand for family planning to limit childbearing satisfied with modern methods. In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), studies have shown that the proportion of married women who want to stop having children has been increasing as well as the proportion using modern contraceptive methods among them. These studies also indicated that this proportion of women are higher in certain regions of Africa than the others. To extend these previous findings, we performed geographical analysis to assess how the proportion of married/in-union women who want to stop having children and the ones using modern methods among them differ geographically. Our findings indicated that neighboring countries where the proportion of married/in-union women who want to stop having children was higher than the overall average were concentrated in eastern and southern Africa (ESA), while neighboring countries in which the proportion of married/in-union women who want to stop having children was lower than the overall average were concentrated in western and central Africa (WCA). Similarly, the results also showed that neighboring countries where the proportion of married/in-union women using modern contraceptive methods among those who want to stop having children was lower than the overall average were concentrated in WCA. Our findings suggest that increasing joint decision making on family planning and uptake of antenatal care in SSA may improve the use of modern contraceptive methods among married/in-union women who want to stop childbearing.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
There is an increasing demand for family planning to limit childbearing in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). However, limited studies have quantified the spatial variations. This study examined: (i) the spatial patterns in the demand for family planning to limit childbearing and satisfied with modern methods, and (ii) the correlates of the demand for family planning to limit childbearing satisfied with modern methods in SSA.
METHODS
METHODS
This study analyzed secondary data on 306,080 married/in-union women obtained from Demographic Health Surveys conducted between 2010 and 2019 in 33 sub-Saharan African countries. We conducted exploratory spatial data analysis, with countries as the unit of analysis. We also performed regression analysis to determine the factors associated with demand for family planning to limit childbearing satisfied with modern methods in SSA.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The mean percentage of women who demanded for family planning to limit childbearing by country was 20.5% while the mean prevalence of demand for family planning to limit childbearing satisfied with modern methods by country was 46.5%. There was a significant positive global spatial autocorrelation in the demand for family planning to limit childbearing (global Moran's I = 0.3, p = 0.001). The cluster map showed the concentration of cold spots (low-low clusters) in western and central Africa (WCA), while hot spots (high-high clusters) were concentrated in eastern and southern Africa (ESA). Also, the demand for family planning to limit childbearing satisfied with modern methods showed significant positive global spatial autocorrelation (global Moran's I = 0.2, p = 0.004) and concentration of cold spots in WCA. In the final multivariable regression model the joint family planning decision making (β = 0.34, p < 0.001), and antenatal care (β = 13.98, p < 0.001) were the significant factors associated with the demand for family planning to limit childbearing satisfied by modern methods.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
There are significant spatial variations in the demand for family planning to limit childbearing and the demand satisfied by modern methods, with cold spots concentrated in WCA. Promoting joint decision making by partners and increasing uptake of antenatal care may improve the demand for family planning to limit childbearing satisfied with modern methods.
In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), studies have shown that the proportion of married women who want to stop having children has been increasing as well as the proportion using modern contraceptive methods among them. These studies also indicated that this proportion of women are higher in certain regions of Africa than the others. To extend these previous findings, we performed geographical analysis to assess how the proportion of married/in-union women who want to stop having children and the ones using modern methods among them differ geographically. Our findings indicated that neighboring countries where the proportion of married/in-union women who want to stop having children was higher than the overall average were concentrated in eastern and southern Africa (ESA), while neighboring countries in which the proportion of married/in-union women who want to stop having children was lower than the overall average were concentrated in western and central Africa (WCA). Similarly, the results also showed that neighboring countries where the proportion of married/in-union women using modern contraceptive methods among those who want to stop having children was lower than the overall average were concentrated in WCA. Our findings suggest that increasing joint decision making on family planning and uptake of antenatal care in SSA may improve the use of modern contraceptive methods among married/in-union women who want to stop childbearing.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), studies have shown that the proportion of married women who want to stop having children has been increasing as well as the proportion using modern contraceptive methods among them. These studies also indicated that this proportion of women are higher in certain regions of Africa than the others. To extend these previous findings, we performed geographical analysis to assess how the proportion of married/in-union women who want to stop having children and the ones using modern methods among them differ geographically. Our findings indicated that neighboring countries where the proportion of married/in-union women who want to stop having children was higher than the overall average were concentrated in eastern and southern Africa (ESA), while neighboring countries in which the proportion of married/in-union women who want to stop having children was lower than the overall average were concentrated in western and central Africa (WCA). Similarly, the results also showed that neighboring countries where the proportion of married/in-union women using modern contraceptive methods among those who want to stop having children was lower than the overall average were concentrated in WCA. Our findings suggest that increasing joint decision making on family planning and uptake of antenatal care in SSA may improve the use of modern contraceptive methods among married/in-union women who want to stop childbearing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35733204
doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01451-5
pii: 10.1186/s12978-022-01451-5
pmc: PMC9215060
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
144Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Reprod Health. 2019 Oct 26;16(1):152
pubmed: 31655615
Am J Public Health. 2011 Jun;101(6):1089-95
pubmed: 21493931
Reprod Health. 2018 Dec 17;15(1):208
pubmed: 30558677
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Apr;74(7):966-72
pubmed: 22361092
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 8;16(12):e0258844
pubmed: 34879066
Stud Fam Plann. 2014 Jun;45(2):151-69
pubmed: 24931073
Int Q Community Health Educ. 2017 Jan;37(2):79-91
pubmed: 28056643
Lancet. 2015 May 16;385(9981):1928-31
pubmed: 24993915
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40670
pubmed: 22815784
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Mar 28;19(1):100
pubmed: 30922262
Popul Dev Rev. 2017 May;43(Suppl Suppl 1):166-191
pubmed: 29081552
Pan Afr Med J. 2015 Jun 22;21:138
pubmed: 26327975
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 7;9(10):e031890
pubmed: 31594900
Am J Public Health. 2007 Jul;97(7):1233-40
pubmed: 17538071
PLoS Med. 2007 Feb;4(2):e31
pubmed: 17284155
Contraception. 2019 Apr;99(4):205-211
pubmed: 30685286
Reprod Health. 2018 Dec 20;15(1):214
pubmed: 30572927
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 10;15(3):e0230139
pubmed: 32155217
Stud Fam Plann. 2014 Jun;45(2):247-62
pubmed: 24931078
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017 Jun 1;43(2):41-50
pubmed: 29261505
Contraception. 2002 Mar;65(3):237-43
pubmed: 11929646
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 12;10(10):e037532
pubmed: 33046466
Contraception. 2015 Nov;92(5):420-1
pubmed: 26276245
Contraception. 2016 Oct;94(4):289-94
pubmed: 27287693
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 15;15(12):e0243316
pubmed: 33320877
Bull World Health Organ. 2011 Feb 1;89(2):137-43
pubmed: 21346925
Reprod Health. 2013 Sep 26;10:52
pubmed: 24067083
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 7;9(1):e022221
pubmed: 30617098
BMC Res Notes. 2018 Aug 13;11(1):581
pubmed: 30103824
Contraception. 2016 Jul;94(1):11-7
pubmed: 27018154
Reprod Health. 2014 Aug 10;11:64
pubmed: 25108444
J Biosoc Sci. 2015 May;47(3):345-62
pubmed: 24911333
J Glob Health. 2017 Dec;7(2):021101
pubmed: 29163936
Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct;54(5):1110-1118
pubmed: 31090931
Lancet. 2006 Nov 18;368(9549):1810-27
pubmed: 17113431
Contracept Reprod Med. 2019 Oct 21;4:17
pubmed: 31645994
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2013 Oct;18(5):381-7
pubmed: 23885659
BMC Public Health. 2018 Apr 2;18(1):430
pubmed: 29609567
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Oct;36(7):904-908
pubmed: 27188593
Int J Qual Health Care. 2008 Oct;20(5):346-51
pubmed: 18621778
Stud Fam Plann. 2015 Dec;46(4):405-22
pubmed: 26643490
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019 Dec;72(6):558-569
pubmed: 31304696
Bull World Health Organ. 2018 Jul 01;96(7):450-461
pubmed: 29962548
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 27;15(11):
pubmed: 30373248
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2013 Mar 21;1(1):97-107
pubmed: 25276520