Embolization after internal carotid artery injury secondary to transsphenoidal pituitary surgery and delayed intranasal coil protrusion: illustrative case.

CT = computed tomography DSA = digital subtraction angiography ENT = ear-nose-throat ICA = internal carotid artery MRA = magnetic resonance angiography MRI = magnetic resonance imaging coil extrusion embolization endoscopic endonasal approach internal carotid artery injury

Journal

Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons
ISSN: 2694-1902
Titre abrégé: J Neurosurg Case Lessons
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918227275606676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Jun 2022
Historique:
received: 10 01 2022
accepted: 24 02 2022
entrez: 23 6 2022
pubmed: 24 6 2022
medline: 24 6 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The authors presented a case of spontaneous nasopharyngeal coil migration that occurred 3 years after a patient had undergone transsphenoidal resection due to pituitary macroadenoma and was treated with coil application because of internal carotid artery injury secondary to transsphenoidal resection of the pituitary macroadenoma. In the literature, eight cases of coil migration that occurred between 2 and 120 months after coil application have been reported, most of which were treated with surgical removal of the coil in a same-day surgery setting. The case presented emphasized that coil protrusion and migration may lead to destruction in the skull base, thereby leading to serious consequences if left untreated, even in the absence of history of trauma. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first case in the literature that required additional invasive procedures due to recurrent bleeding that occurred several months after surgical removal of coils. Also, this report underlined the need for careful and long-term follow-up of coil materials used for the treatment of pseudoaneurysms caused by vascular injuries secondary to skull base injury during surgery.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The authors presented a case of spontaneous nasopharyngeal coil migration that occurred 3 years after a patient had undergone transsphenoidal resection due to pituitary macroadenoma and was treated with coil application because of internal carotid artery injury secondary to transsphenoidal resection of the pituitary macroadenoma.
OBSERVATIONS METHODS
In the literature, eight cases of coil migration that occurred between 2 and 120 months after coil application have been reported, most of which were treated with surgical removal of the coil in a same-day surgery setting.
LESSONS CONCLUSIONS
The case presented emphasized that coil protrusion and migration may lead to destruction in the skull base, thereby leading to serious consequences if left untreated, even in the absence of history of trauma. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first case in the literature that required additional invasive procedures due to recurrent bleeding that occurred several months after surgical removal of coils. Also, this report underlined the need for careful and long-term follow-up of coil materials used for the treatment of pseudoaneurysms caused by vascular injuries secondary to skull base injury during surgery.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35733820
doi: 10.3171/CASE2215
pii: CASE2215
pmc: PMC9204935
doi:
pii:

Types de publication

Case Reports

Langues

eng

Pagination

CASE2215

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

Références

Neurointervention. 2018 Mar;13(1):66-69
pubmed: 29535902
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Feb 1;143(2):193-195
pubmed: 27560184
J Neurol Surg Rep. 2014 Dec;75(2):e255-8
pubmed: 25485225
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2012;52(6):439-42
pubmed: 22729078
Case Rep Neurol. 2019 Jan 17;11(1):4-9
pubmed: 30792650
Radiology. 1991 Mar;178(3):663-70
pubmed: 1994399
J Laryngol Otol. 2013 Jan;127(1):88-91
pubmed: 23199626
Neurosurgery. 2013 Dec;73(2 Suppl Operative):ons261-9; discussion ons269-70
pubmed: 23695646
J Neurosurg. 2007 Mar;106(3):512
pubmed: 17367080
Laryngoscope. 1998 Mar;108(3):326-31
pubmed: 9504602
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2011 Oct;44(5):1059-79
pubmed: 21978896
J Clin Neurosci. 2013 Sep;20(9):1299-302
pubmed: 23746753
Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2009 May;19(2):271-81, Table of Contents
pubmed: 19442910
Rofo. 2007 Aug;179(8):862-3
pubmed: 17599288
Br J Neurosurg. 2020 Jan 29;:1-3
pubmed: 31994916
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006 Nov-Dec;29(6):958-68
pubmed: 16897263
Interv Neuroradiol. 2019 Apr;25(2):139-143
pubmed: 30296867
Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2009 Apr;52(2):89-92
pubmed: 19452417
Cancer Manag Res. 2013;5:21-4
pubmed: 23403482

Auteurs

Abdurrahim Tas (A)

Departments of1Neurosurgery and.

Nazim Bozan (N)

2Ear-Nose-Throat, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey.

Ramazan Akin (R)

2Ear-Nose-Throat, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey.

Abdurrahman Aycan (A)

Departments of1Neurosurgery and.

Classifications MeSH