Multiplexed quantification of insulin and C-peptide by LC-MS/MS without the use of antibodies.

The measurement of insulin and C-peptide provides a valuable tool for the clinical evaluation of hypoglycemia. In research, these biomarkers are used together to better understand hyperinsulinemia, hepatic insulin clearance, and beta cell function. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is an attractive approach for the analysis of insulin and C-peptide because the platform is specific, can avoid certain limitations of immunoassays, and can be multiplexed. Previously described LC-MS/MS methods for the simultaneous quantification of insulin and C-peptide measure the intact analytes and most have relied on immunoaffinity enrichment. These approaches can be limited in terms of sensitivity and interference from auto-antibodies, respectively. We have developed a novel method that does not require antibodies and uses proteolytic digestion to yield readily ionizable proteotypic peptides that enables the sensitive, specific, and simultaneous quantitation of insulin and C-peptide. Serum samples were precipitated with acetonitrile. Analytes were enriched using solid phase extraction and then digested with endoproteinase Glu-C. Surrogate peptides for insulin and C-peptide were analyzed using targeted LC-MS/MS. Inter-day imprecision was below 20 %CV and linearity was observed down to the lower limit of quantitation for both analytes (insulin = 0.09 ng/mL, C-peptide = 0.06 ng/mL). Comparison to a commercially available insulin immunoassay (Beckman Coulter UniCel DxI 600 Access) revealed a 30% bias between methods. A novel LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous analysis of insulin and C-peptide using Glu-C digestion was developed and evaluated. A detailed standard operating procedure is provided to help facilitate implementation in other laboratories.

Informations de copyright

© 2022 THE AUTHORS.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.