Influence on Implant Bone Healing of a Collagen Membrane Placed Subjacent the Sinus Mucosa-A Randomized Clinical Trial on Sinus Floor Elevation.

bone grafting bone healing collagen membrane dental implants morphometry osteoconductivity sinus mucosa xenograft

Journal

Dentistry journal
ISSN: 2304-6767
Titre abrégé: Dent J (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101716125

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Jun 2022
Historique:
received: 01 03 2022
revised: 15 04 2022
accepted: 06 06 2022
entrez: 23 6 2022
pubmed: 24 6 2022
medline: 24 6 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Perforation of the sinus mucosa is quite a frequent complication that might occur during sinus floor elevation. The perforation is often protected with a collagen membrane to avoid the extrusion of graft particles within the sinus. However, this procedure might hinder the innate osteogenic potential of the sinus mucosa. Hence, the aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of a placement of a collagen membrane subjacent the Schneiderian membrane during sinus floor elevation on implant bone healing. Twenty volunteers took part in the trial. Ten were randomly included in the group that received a collagen membrane subjacent the sinus mucosa (Mb group), and ten did not receive the membrane (non-Mb group). A collagenated corticocancellous porcine bone was used to fill the elevated space. Six 6 months after the sinus floor elevation, a mini implant was placed transcrestally and retrieved after a further 3 months. Histological analyses were then performed on the full body of the mini implant as well as on its coronal and apical portions. The new bone apposition proportion onto the implant surface was similar in the Mb and non-Mb groups, both in the apical and coronal portions of the mini implants. A lesser amount of graft was found in contact with the surface. New bone density around the mini implants were similar both in the apical and coronal portions. However, a statistically higher proportion of graft particles was found in the Mb group compared to the non-membrane group. The placement of a collagen membrane subjacent the sinus mucosa did not affect bone healing at implants and bone density.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Perforation of the sinus mucosa is quite a frequent complication that might occur during sinus floor elevation. The perforation is often protected with a collagen membrane to avoid the extrusion of graft particles within the sinus. However, this procedure might hinder the innate osteogenic potential of the sinus mucosa. Hence, the aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of a placement of a collagen membrane subjacent the Schneiderian membrane during sinus floor elevation on implant bone healing.
METHODS METHODS
Twenty volunteers took part in the trial. Ten were randomly included in the group that received a collagen membrane subjacent the sinus mucosa (Mb group), and ten did not receive the membrane (non-Mb group). A collagenated corticocancellous porcine bone was used to fill the elevated space. Six 6 months after the sinus floor elevation, a mini implant was placed transcrestally and retrieved after a further 3 months. Histological analyses were then performed on the full body of the mini implant as well as on its coronal and apical portions.
RESULTS RESULTS
The new bone apposition proportion onto the implant surface was similar in the Mb and non-Mb groups, both in the apical and coronal portions of the mini implants. A lesser amount of graft was found in contact with the surface. New bone density around the mini implants were similar both in the apical and coronal portions. However, a statistically higher proportion of graft particles was found in the Mb group compared to the non-membrane group.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The placement of a collagen membrane subjacent the sinus mucosa did not affect bone healing at implants and bone density.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35735646
pii: dj10060105
doi: 10.3390/dj10060105
pmc: PMC9221570
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : ARDEC Academy
ID : NA
Organisme : Sweden & Martina
ID : NA

Références

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Feb;15(1):126-33
pubmed: 14731186
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999 Jul-Aug;14(4):557-64
pubmed: 10453672
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Jul;28(7):e21-e30
pubmed: 27080163
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Aug;13(4):405-9
pubmed: 12175378
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Nov;26(11):1237-43
pubmed: 25109369
J Funct Biomater. 2022 Feb 28;13(1):
pubmed: 35323222
J Microsc. 1973 Dec;99(3):301-29
pubmed: 4801631
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Nov;27(11):1454-1461
pubmed: 26754150
J Periodontol. 2004 Apr;75(4):511-6
pubmed: 15152813
J Investig Clin Dent. 2018 Nov;9(4):e12362
pubmed: 30144303
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Feb;23(2):175-181
pubmed: 21668505
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Jan-Feb;24(1):73-80
pubmed: 19344028
Dent J (Basel). 2021 Dec 28;10(1):
pubmed: 35049600
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Aug;45(4):220-224
pubmed: 31508355
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Feb;27(2):233-40
pubmed: 25712609
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Dec;28(12):1567-1576
pubmed: 28593727
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Dec;25(4):477-485
pubmed: 33543404
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 Jul-Aug;36(4):660-668
pubmed: 34411205
Dent J (Basel). 2021 Sep 06;9(9):
pubmed: 34562979
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jan;47(1):103-116
pubmed: 28545806
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Dec 5;34(1):223–232
pubmed: 30521653
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Sep;24(3):299-308
pubmed: 32363552
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Dec;21(12):1320-6
pubmed: 20637033
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Oct;15(5):575-80
pubmed: 15355400
J Clin Periodontol. 2017 Jun;44(6):660-671
pubmed: 28382627
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Aug;39(8):793-801
pubmed: 20417057
J Periodontol. 1976 May;47(5):256-60
pubmed: 775048
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 May;28(5):503-511
pubmed: 26969193
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Mar/Apr;35(2):350-356
pubmed: 32142572
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2004;6(3):165-73
pubmed: 15726851
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jan;72(1):47-52
pubmed: 24071378
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Mar-Apr;31(2):331-7
pubmed: 26478975
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Dec;43(6):493-9
pubmed: 15908076
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Nov-Dec;23(6):1128-32
pubmed: 19216284
Dent J (Basel). 2021 May 31;9(6):
pubmed: 34072644
J Clin Periodontol. 2005 May;32(5):448-55
pubmed: 15842258
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 May/Jun;35(3):591-598
pubmed: 32406658
J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Sep;35(8 Suppl):216-40
pubmed: 18724852
Int J Implant Dent. 2019 Aug 19;5(1):31
pubmed: 31423548
Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Jul 12;7(1):91
pubmed: 34250560

Auteurs

Akihiro Morimoto (A)

Department of Oral Implantology, School of Dentistry, Osaka Dental University, Osaka 573-1144, Japan.

Nobuhiro Kobayashi (N)

Department of Oral Implantology, School of Dentistry, Osaka Dental University, Osaka 573-1144, Japan.

Mauro Ferri (M)

ARDEC Foundation, Cartagena de Indias 130001, Colombia.

Giovanna Iezzi (G)

Department of Medical Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.

Adriano Piattelli (A)

Department of Medical Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.

Natalia Fortich Mesa (N)

School of Dentistry, University Corporation Rafael Núñez, Cartagena de Indias 130001, Colombia.

Daniele Botticelli (D)

ARDEC Academy, 47923 Rimini, Italy.

Classifications MeSH