Multicenter Evaluation of the Novel ETEST Fosfomycin for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacterales, Enterococcus faecalis, and Staphylococcus Species.
ETEST
Enterobacterales
Enterococcus faecalis
Staphylococcus spp.
antimicrobial susceptibility testing
fosfomycin
gradient methods
Journal
Journal of clinical microbiology
ISSN: 1098-660X
Titre abrégé: J Clin Microbiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505564
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 07 2022
20 07 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
24
6
2022
medline:
23
7
2022
entrez:
23
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Fosfomycin is a phosphonic acid derivative active against a wide spectrum of Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens. It is used for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTI) or severe infections by oral or intravenous (i.v.) administration. In order to improve its performance and robustness, the fosfomycin strip, an antibiotic gradient diffusion strip, was redeveloped and evaluated in the multicenter study summarized in this paper. ETEST fosfomycin (ETEST FO) clinical performance was evaluated by three study sites on 152 Enterococcus faecalis, 100 Staphylococcus spp. and 330 Enterobacterales in comparison with the CLSI and EUCAST agar dilution reference method. Referring to FDA performance criteria, the ETEST FO achieved 91.0% of essential (EA) and 99.0% of categorical agreement (CA) for Escherichia coli. In addition, 98.0% EA and 93.4% CA were achieved for E. faecalis, with no very major errors (VME) or major errors (ME). According to EUCAST breakpoints for intravenous fosfomycin use, Enterobacterales and Staphylococcus spp. also met ISO acceptance criteria for EA and CA (EA 91.5%, 94.0%, respectively, and CA 98.0% for both). A VME rate of 8.8% was observed for Enterobacterales but the MICs were within EA. A trend to predict lower MICs for Citrobacter spp., E. coli and Salmonella enterica and to predict higher MICs for Klebsiella pneumoniae MICs was observed, while ETEST FO should not be used for Enterobacter cloacae, because of low EA and a high VME rate. The study results support the efficiency of the novel ETEST FO, making it an easy-to-handle tool as a substitute to the classical agar dilution method.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35736011
doi: 10.1128/jcm.00021-22
pmc: PMC9297813
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Fosfomycin
2N81MY12TE
Agar
9002-18-0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0002122Références
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 May;13(5):705-9
pubmed: 666297
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016 Apr;29(2):321-47
pubmed: 26960938
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Sep 1;73(9):2380-2387
pubmed: 29982660
Science. 1969 Oct 3;166(3901):122-3
pubmed: 5809587
Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Aug 10;9(8):
pubmed: 32785114
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Nov 18;59(12):e0163521
pubmed: 34495708
J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Jun;52(6):1893-7
pubmed: 24648559
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2019 May;32 Suppl 1:1-7
pubmed: 31131586
J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020 Sep;22:78-83
pubmed: 32007618
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Apr 1;46(7):1069-77
pubmed: 18444827
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007 Apr;59(4):810-2
pubmed: 17289760
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Sep 24;57(10):
pubmed: 31340992
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2019 May;32 Suppl 1:8-18
pubmed: 31131587
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018 Nov;52(5):678-681
pubmed: 29958976