Analysis of the Contact Area for Three Types of Upper Limb Strikes.
Mixed Martial Art
combat sports
direct punch
elbow strike
hand
injury
palm strike
self-defense
Journal
Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology
ISSN: 2411-5142
Titre abrégé: J Funct Morphol Kinesiol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101712257
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Jun 2022
17 Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
20
05
2022
revised:
13
06
2022
accepted:
13
06
2022
entrez:
23
6
2022
pubmed:
24
6
2022
medline:
24
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Performance in strike combat sports is mostly evaluated through the values of the net force, acceleration, or speed to improve efficient training procedures and/or to assess the injury. There are limited data on the upper limb striking area, which can be a useful variable for contact pressure assessment. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the contact area of the upper limb in three different strike technique positions. A total of 38 men and 38 women (n = 76, 27.3 ± 8.5 years of age, 73.9 ± 13.8 kg of body weight, 173.3 ± 8.4 cm of body height) performed a static simulation of punch with a fist, palm strike, and elbow strike, where three segments of the right upper limb were scanned. The analysis of 684 images showed a correlation (r = 0.634) between weight and punch technique position in men and significant differences in elbow strike (p < 0.001) and palm strike (p < 0.0001) between women and men. In both groups, the palm demonstrated the largest area and the elbow the smallest one. These data may be used to evaluate strike contact pressure in future studies in forensic biomechanics and assessment of injury in combat sports and self-defense.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35736021
pii: jfmk7020050
doi: 10.3390/jfmk7020050
pmc: PMC9224799
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : University of West Bohemia
ID : SGS-2022-009
Organisme : European Regional Development Fund-Project
ID : CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/17_048/0007280
Références
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 30;17(13):
pubmed: 32629826
Bone. 2004 Feb;34(2):281-7
pubmed: 14962806
J Sports Sci Med. 2009 Nov 01;8(CSSI3):47-52
pubmed: 24474886
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Dec 16;21(24):
pubmed: 34960487
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1980 Jan;52(1):27-31
pubmed: 7369333
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 28;19(7):
pubmed: 35409684
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 9;16(12):e0261141
pubmed: 34882749
Eur J Sport Sci. 2018 Jul;18(6):796-805
pubmed: 29609507
J Hum Kinet. 2016 Sep 10;52:95-106
pubmed: 28149397
Nutrients. 2010 Oct;2(10):1075-85
pubmed: 22253998
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2011 Mar;51(1):26-32
pubmed: 21297560
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 19;8(11):e79793
pubmed: 24260301
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 13;16(12):e0261008
pubmed: 34898632
Mil Med. 2017 Nov;182(11):e2005-e2009
pubmed: 29087872
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Oct;48:67-72
pubmed: 33839634
Ergonomics. 2017 May;60(5):669-679
pubmed: 27338089
Int J Legal Med. 2021 May;135(3):853-859
pubmed: 33057792
Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2001 Jul;29(3):109-12
pubmed: 11474957
J Neurotrauma. 1995 Aug;12(4):659-68
pubmed: 8683617
J Biomech. 2009 Nov 13;42(15):2479-85
pubmed: 19674749
Asian J Sports Med. 2011 Mar;2(1):31-6
pubmed: 22375215
J Hum Kinet. 2019 Aug 21;68:145-155
pubmed: 31531140
Biomed Mater Eng. 2018;29(5):629-639
pubmed: 30400076
Phys Sportsmed. 2021 Jul 19;:1-5
pubmed: 34236932
Percept Mot Skills. 2008 Feb;106(1):188-96
pubmed: 18459367
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 24;17(21):
pubmed: 33114304
Forensic Sci Int. 2020 Jul;312:110303
pubmed: 32387869
Gait Posture. 2020 Jun;79:195-202
pubmed: 32438266
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Dec 21-28;291(6511):1756-7
pubmed: 3936571
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Jan;30(1):109-16
pubmed: 26110348
J Athl Train. 2009 Mar-Apr;44(2):142-7
pubmed: 19295958
J Biomech. 2011 Feb 3;44(3):532-9
pubmed: 21035120
Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2016;18(1):47-54
pubmed: 27149957
J Sci Med Sport. 2008 Jun;11(3):353-6
pubmed: 17703995
Sports Biomech. 2020 Jul 17;:1-19
pubmed: 32677587
Hum Mov Sci. 2012 Aug;31(4):824-33
pubmed: 22047701