High Incidence of Invasive Fungal Diseases in Patients with FLT3-Mutated AML Treated with Midostaurin: Results of a Multicenter Observational SEIFEM Study.
acute myeloid leukemia
antifungal prophylaxis
invasive fungal disease
midostaurin
Journal
Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2309-608X
Titre abrégé: J Fungi (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101671827
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 May 2022
29 May 2022
Historique:
received:
05
05
2022
revised:
22
05
2022
accepted:
27
05
2022
entrez:
23
6
2022
pubmed:
24
6
2022
medline:
24
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The potential drug-drug interactions of midostaurin may impact the choice of antifungal (AF) prophylaxis in FLT3-positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. To evaluate the incidence of invasive fungal diseases (IFD) during the treatment of FLT3-mutated AML patients and to correlate it to the different AF prophylaxis strategies, we planned a multicenter observational study involving 15 SEIFEM centers. One hundred fourteen patients treated with chemotherapy + midostaurin as induction/reinduction, consolidation or both were enrolled. During induction, the incidence of probable/proven and possible IFD was 10.5% and 9.7%, respectively; no statistically significant difference was observed according to the different AF strategy adopted. The median duration of neutropenia was similar in patients with or without IFD. Proven/probable and possible IFD incidence was 2.4% and 1.8%, respectively, during consolidation. Age was the only risk factor for IFD (OR, 95% CI, 1.10 [1.03-1.19]) and complete remission achievement after first induction the only one for survival (OR, 95% CI, 5.12 [1.93-13.60]). The rate of midostaurin discontinuation was similar across different AF strategies. The IFD attributable mortality during induction was 8.3%. In conclusion, the 20.2% overall incidence of IFD occurring in FLT3-mutated AML during induction with chemotherapy + midostaurin, regardless of AF strategy type, was noteworthy, and merits further study, particularly in elderly patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35736066
pii: jof8060583
doi: 10.3390/jof8060583
pmc: PMC9224885
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Cancer. 1997 Dec 1;80(11 Suppl):2205-9
pubmed: 9395035
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 25;356(4):348-59
pubmed: 17251531
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Nov 15;102(46):16741-6
pubmed: 16272221
Med Mycol. 2017 Jan 1;55(1):82-86
pubmed: 27915304
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Apr 1;74(4):1062-1068
pubmed: 30649413
Drug Metab Dispos. 2018 Feb;46(2):109-121
pubmed: 29117990
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2021 May;21(5):e477-e482
pubmed: 33678591
Nat Rev Immunol. 2015 Feb;15(2):87-103
pubmed: 25614319
Chemotherapy. 2021;66(1-2):47-52
pubmed: 33677444
J Immunol. 2005 Sep 15;175(6):3674-80
pubmed: 16148112
Haematologica. 2011 Nov;96(11):1685-91
pubmed: 21791468
Blood. 2014 Dec 18;124(26):3858-69
pubmed: 25339358
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Sep 12;71(6):1367-1376
pubmed: 31802125
Blood. 2019 Feb 21;133(8):840-851
pubmed: 30563875
Blood. 1982 Aug;60(2):454-62
pubmed: 6953986
Blood. 2017 Jan 26;129(4):424-447
pubmed: 27895058
Haematologica. 2011 Feb;96(2):337-41
pubmed: 21071502
Mycoses. 2020 Oct;63(10):1094-1100
pubmed: 32697010
Med Mycol. 2011 Oct;49(7):681-7
pubmed: 21314250
Leuk Lymphoma. 2019 Dec;60(12):3044-3050
pubmed: 31120311
Drug Metab Dispos. 2017 May;45(5):540-555
pubmed: 28270565
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 3;377(5):454-464
pubmed: 28644114