UV filters and their impact on marine life: state of the science, data gaps, and next steps.
Journal
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV
ISSN: 1468-3083
Titre abrégé: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9216037
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
03
12
2021
accepted:
29
04
2022
entrez:
23
6
2022
pubmed:
24
6
2022
medline:
28
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Sunscreens containing broad-spectrum ultraviolet (UV) filters play an essential role in protecting the skin against the damage induced by sun overexposure. However, the widespread use of sunscreens and other personal care products containing these filters has led to these compounds being widely detected in the environment and being identified as emerging pollutants in marine waters. Concerns raised by laboratory studies investigating the potential impact of UV filters on coral communities have already led to bans on the use of some sunscreens in a few tourist hotspots. Although UV filter pollution may be just one of the many environmental factors impacting coral health worldwide, the media attention surrounding these studies and the legislative changes may lead patients to question dermatologists about the environmental safety of some sunscreen products. This review provides an overview of current knowledge on the impact of UV filters on marine ecosystems, concentrating on recent studies examining the effects of commonly used filters on organisms at low trophic levels and of how alternative approaches, such as metabolomics, can be used to further assess UV filter ecotoxicity. Current gaps in our knowledge are also discussed, most notably the need to increase our understanding of the longer-term fate and behaviour of UV filters in the marine environment, develop more adapted standardized ecotoxicity tests for a wider range of marine species, and evaluate the impact of UV filters on the marine food web. We then discuss future perspectives for the development of new, more environmentally friendly, filters that may enable the use of the most toxic compounds to be reduced without compromising the effectiveness of sunscreen formulations. Finally, we consider how dermatologists play a key role in educating patients on the need for a balanced approach to sun exposure, sun protection, and conservation of the marine environment.
Substances chimiques
Cosmetics
0
Sunscreening Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
22-28Subventions
Organisme : Laboratoires Dermatologiques Avène-Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmétique
Organisme : Pierre Fabre
Informations de copyright
© 2022 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.
Références
Sánchez-Quiles D, Blasco J, Tovar-Sánchez A. Sunscreen components are a new environmental concern in coastal waters: an overview. Sunscreens in Coastal Ecosystems: Occurrence, Behavior, Effect and Risk. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020: 1-14.
Sanchez-Quiles D, Tovar-Sanchez A. Are sunscreens a new environmental risk associated with coastal tourism? Environ Int 2015; 83: 158-170.
Tovar-Sanchez A, Sanchez-Quiles D, Basterretxea G et al. Sunscreen products as emerging pollutants to coastal waters. PLoS One 2013; 8: e65451.
Juliano C, Magrini GA. Cosmetic ingredients as emerging pollutants of environmental and health concern. A mini-review. Cosmetics 2017; 4: 11.
Krutmann J, Passeron T, Gilaberte Y et al. Photoprotection of the future: challenges and opportunities. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2020; 34: 447-454.
Peacey V, Steptoe A, Sanderman R, Wardle J. Ten-year changes in sun protection behaviors and beliefs of young adults in 13 European countries. Prev Med 2006; 43: 460-465.
Heerfordt IM, Philipsen PA, Larsen BO, Wulf HC. Long-term trend in sunscreen use among beachgoers in Denmark. Acta Derm Venereol 2017; 97: 1202-1205.
Gomez-Berrada M-P, Ficheux A-S, Rakotomalala S et al. Consumption and exposure assessment to sunscreen products: a key point for safety assessment. Food Chem Toxicol 2018; 114: 170-179.
Ghiasvand R, Lund E, Edvardsen K, Weiderpass E, Veierød M. Prevalence and trends of sunscreen use and sunburn among Norwegian women. Br J Dermatol 2015; 172: 475-483.
Gabros S, Nessel TA, Zito PM. Sunscreens and Photoprotection. StatPearls, Treasure Island, FL, 2020.
Raffa RB, Pergolizzi JV, Jr., Taylor R, Jr., Kitzen JM, Group NR. Sunscreen bans: coral reefs and skin cancer. J Clin Pharm Ther 2019;44: 134-139.
Mitchelmore CL, Burns EE, Conway A, Heyes A, Davies IA. A critical review of organic ultraviolet filter exposure, Hazard, and risk to corals. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021; 40: 967-988.
Narla S, Lim HW. Sunscreen: FDA regulation, and environmental and health impact. Photochem Photobiol Sci 2020; 19: 66-70.
Levine A. Reducing the prevalence of chemical UV filters from sunscreen in aquatic environments: regulatory, public awareness, and other considerations. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2021; 17: 982-988.
D'Orazio J, Jarrett S, Amaro-Ortiz A, Scott T. UV radiation and the skin. Int J Mol Sci 2013; 14: 12222-12248.
Fivenson D, Sabzevari N, Qiblawi S et al. Sunscreens: UV filters to protect us: part 2-increasing awareness of UV filters and their potential toxicities to us and our environment. Int J Women's Dermatol 2020; 7: 45-69.
Pirotta G. Sunscreen regulation in the world. Sunscreens in Coastal Ecosystems: Occurrence, Behavior, Effect and Risk. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020: 15-35.
Pintado-Herrera MG, Lara Martín PA. Fate and behavior of UV filters in the marine environment. In Tovar-Sánchez A, Sánchez-Quiles D, Blasco J, eds. Sunscreens in Coastal Ecosystems. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020: 59-83.
Labille J, Slomberg D, Catalano R et al. Assessing UV filter inputs into beach waters during recreational activity: a field study of three French Mediterranean beaches from consumer survey to water analysis. Sci Total Environ 2020; 706: 136010.
Sharifan H, Klein D, Morse AN. UV filters are an environmental threat in the Gulf of Mexico: a case study of Texas coastal zones. Oceanologia 2016; 58: 327-335.
Ramos S, Homem V, Alves A, Santos L. A review of organic UV-filters in wastewater treatment plants. Environ Int 2016; 86: 24-44.
Wu F, Seib M, Mauel S, Klinzing S, Hicks AL. A citizen science approach estimating titanium dioxide released from personal care products. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0235988.
Fagervold S, Rodrigues A, Rohée C et al. Occurrence and environmental distribution of 5 UV filters during the summer season in different water bodies. Water Air Soil Pollut 2019; 230: 1-13.
Cadena-Aizaga MI, Montesdeoca-Esponda S, Torres-Padrón ME, Sosa-Ferrera Z, Santana-Rodríguez JJ. Organic UV filters in marine environments: an update of analytical methodologies, occurrence and distribution. Trends Environ Anal Chem 2020; 25: e00079.
Labille J, Catalano R, Slomberg D et al. Assessing sunscreen lifecycle to minimize environmental risk posed by nanoparticulate UV-filters - a review for safer-by-design products. Sci Total Environ 2020; 706: 136010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136010
Botta C, Labille J, Auffan M et al. TiO(2)-based nanoparticles released in water from commercialized sunscreens in a life-cycle perspective: structures and quantities. Environ Pollut 2011; 159: 1543-1550.
Gago-Ferrero P, Badia-Fabregat M, Olivares A et al. Evaluation of fungal- and photo-degradation as potential treatments for the removal of sunscreens BP3 and BP1. Sci Total Environ 2012; 427-428: 355-363.
Rodil R, Moeder M, Altenburger R, Schmitt-Jansen M. Photostability and phytotoxicity of selected sunscreen agents and their degradation mixtures in water. Anal Bioanal Chem 2009; 395: 1513-1524.
Volpe A, Pagano M, Mascolo G, Grenni P, Rossetti S. Biodegradation of UV-filters in marine sediments. Sci Total Environ 2017; 575: 448-457.
Langford KH, Reid MJ, Fjeld E, Oxnevad S, Thomas KV. Environmental occurrence and risk of organic UV filters and stabilizers in multiple matrices in Norway. Environ Int 2015; 80: 1-7.
Emnet P, Gaw S, Northcott G, Storey B, Graham L. Personal care products and steroid hormones in the Antarctic coastal environment associated with two Antarctic research stations, McMurdo Station and Scott Base. Environ Res 2015; 136: 331-342.
Sang Z, Leung KS. Environmental occurrence and ecological risk assessment of organic UV filters in marine organisms from Hong Kong coastal waters. Sci Total Environ 2016; 566-567: 489-498.
Bachelot M, Li Z, Munaron D et al. Organic UV filter concentrations in marine mussels from French coastal regions. Sci Total Environ 2012; 420: 273-279.
Groz MP, Bueno MM, Rosain D et al. Detection of emerging contaminants (UV filters, UV stabilizers and musks) in marine mussels from Portuguese coast by QuEChERS extraction and GC-MS/MS. Sci Total Environ 2014; 493: 162-169.
Tsui MMP, Lam JCW, Ng TY et al. Occurrence, distribution, and fate of organic UV filters in coral communities. Environ Sci Technol 2017; 51: 4182-4190.
Mitchelmore CL, He K, Gonsior M et al. Occurrence and distribution of UV-filters and other anthropogenic contaminants in coastal surface water, sediment, and coral tissue from Hawaii. Sci Total Environ 2019; 670: 398-410.
Cunha SC, Fernandes JO, Vallecillos L et al. Co-occurrence of musk fragrances and UV-filters in seafood and macroalgae collected in European hotspots. Environ Res 2015; 143: 65-71.
Ziarrusta H, Mijangos L, Montes R et al. Study of bioconcentration of oxybenzone in gilt-head bream and characterization of its by-products. Chemosphere 2018; 208: 399-407.
Cocci P, Mosconi G, Palermo FA. Sunscreen active ingredients in loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) and their relation to molecular markers of inflammation, oxidative stress and hormonal activity in wild populations. Mar Pollut Bull 2020; 153: 111012.
Gago-Ferrero P, Alonso MB, Bertozzi CP et al. First determination of UV filters in marine mammals. Octocrylene levels in Franciscana dolphins. Environ Sci Technol 2013; 47: 5619-5625.
Molins-Delgado D, Manez M, Andreu A et al. A potential new threat to wild life: presence of UV filters in bird eggs from a preserved area. Environ Sci Technol 2017; 51: 10983-10990.
Carve M, Nugegoda D, Allinson G, Shimeta J. A systematic review and ecological risk assessment for organic ultraviolet filters in aquatic environments. Environ Pollut 2021; 268: 115894.
Lozano C, Givens J, Stien D, Matallana-Surget S, Lebaron P. Bioaccumulation and Toxicological Effects of UV-Filters on Marine Species. Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2020.
Thorel E, Clergeaud F, Jaugeon L et al. Effect of 10 UV filters on the brine shrimp Artemia Salina and the marine microalga Tetraselmis sp. Toxics 2020; 8: 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics8020029
Miller RJ, Bennett S, Keller AA, Pease S, Lenihan HS. TiO2 nanoparticles are phototoxic to marine phytoplankton. PLoS One 2012; 7: e30321.
Suman TY, Radhika Rajasree SR, Kirubagaran R. Evaluation of zinc oxide nanoparticles toxicity on marine algae chlorella vulgaris through flow cytometric, cytotoxicity and oxidative stress analysis. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2015; 113: 23-30.
Zhang C, Wang J, Tan L, Chen X. Toxic effects of nano-ZnO on marine microalgae Skeletonema costatum: attention to the accumulation of intracellular Zn. Aquat Toxicol 2016; 178: 158-164.
Bhuvaneshwari M, Sagar B, Doshi S, Chandrasekaran N, Mukherjee A. Comparative study on toxicity of ZnO and TiO2 nanoparticles on Artemia Salina: effect of pre-UV-A and visible light irradiation. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2017; 24: 5633-5646.
Huang Y, Law JC, Lam TK, Leung KS. Risks of organic UV filters: a review of environmental and human health concern studies. Sci Total Environ 2021; 755: 142486.
Barone AN, Hayes CE, Kerr JJ, Lee RC, Flaherty DB. Acute toxicity testing of TiO2-based vs. oxybenzone-based sunscreens on clownfish (Amphiprion ocellaris). Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2019; 26: 14513-14520.
Araujo MJ, Rocha RJM, Soares A et al. Effects of UV filter 4-methylbenzylidene camphor during early development of Solea senegalensis Kaup, 1858. Sci Total Environ 2018; 628-629: 1395-1404.
Cong Y, Jin F, Wang J, Mu J. The embryotoxicity of ZnO nanoparticles to marine medaka, Oryzias melastigma. Aquat Toxicol 2017; 185: 11-18.
Hughes TP, Anderson KD, Connolly SR et al. Spatial and temporal patterns of mass bleaching of corals in the Anthropocene. Science (New York, NY) 2018; 359: 80-83.
Hughes TP, Kerry JT, Alvarez-Noriega M et al. Global warming and recurrent mass bleaching of corals. Nature 2017; 543: 373-377.
Hughes TP, Kerry JT, Baird AH et al. Global warming transforms coral reef assemblages. Nature 2018; 556: 492-496.
Hoegh-Guldberg O, Poloczanska ES, Skirving W, Dove S. Coral reef ecosystems under climate change and ocean acidification. Front Mar Sci 2017; 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00158
Albright R, Takeshita Y, Koweek DA et al. Carbon dioxide addition to coral reef waters suppresses net community calcification. Nature 2018; 555: 516-519.
Harborne AR, Rogers A, Bozec Y-M, Mumby PJ. Multiple stressors and the functioning of coral reefs. Ann Rev Mar Sci 2017; 9: 445-468.
Bruno JF, Côté IM, Toth LT. Climate change, coral loss, and the curious case of the parrotfish paradigm: why Don't Marine protected areas improve reef resilience? Ann Rev Mar Sci 2019; 11: 307-334.
Wagner D, Friedlander AM, Pyle RL et al. Coral reefs of the high seas: hidden biodiversity hotspots in need of protection. Front Mar Sci 2020; 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.567428
Corinaldesi C, Marcellini F, Nepote E, Damiani E, Danovaro R. Impact of inorganic UV filters contained in sunscreen products on tropical stony corals (Acropora spp.). Sci Total Environ 2018; 637-638: 1279-1285.
Jovanovic B, Guzman HM. Effects of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles on caribbean reef-building coral (Montastraea faveolata). Environ Toxicol Chem 2014; 33: 1346-1353.
Stien D, Clergeaud F, Rodrigues AMS et al. Metabolomics reveal that octocrylene accumulates in Pocillopora damicornis tissues as fatty acid conjugates and triggers coral cell mitochondrial dysfunction. Anal Chem 2019; 91: 990-995.
Stien D, Suzuki M, Rodrigues AMS et al. A unique approach to monitor stress in coral exposed to emerging pollutants. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 9601.
EU. Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products. URL http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2009/1223/2021-08-23 (last accessed September 2021).
Miller IB, Pawlowski S, Kellermann MY et al. Toxic effects of UV filters from sunscreens on coral reefs revisited: regulatory aspects for “reef safe” products. Environ Sci Europe 2021; 33: 74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-021-00515-w
Pandika M. Looking to nature for new sunscreens. ACS Cent Sci 2018; 4: 788-790.
Mirsky RS, Prado G, Svoboda RM, Rigel DS. Oxybenzone and sunscreens: a critical review of the evidence and a plan for discussion with patients. SKIN J Cutan Med 2018; 12: 264-268.
Schneider SL, Lim HW. Review of environmental effects of oxybenzone and other sunscreen active ingredients. J Am Acad Dermatol 2019; 80: 266-271.
Schneider SL, Lim HW. A review of inorganic UV filters zinc oxide and titanium dioxide. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2019; 35: 442-446.