A scoping review of strategies to support public health recovery in the transition to a "new normal" in the age of COVID-19.
COVID-19
Disaster
Disaster recovery
Pandemic
Public health system
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 06 2022
23 06 2022
Historique:
received:
17
12
2021
accepted:
17
06
2022
entrez:
23
6
2022
pubmed:
24
6
2022
medline:
28
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the public health workforce has experienced re-deployment from core functions such as health promotion, disease prevention, and health protection, to preventing and tracking the spread of COVID-19. With continued pandemic deployment coupled with the exacerbation of existing health disparities due to the pandemic, public health systems need to re-start the delivery of core public health programming alongside COVID-19 activities. The purpose of this scoping review was to identify strategies that support the re-integration of core public health programming alongside ongoing pandemic or emergency response. The Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews was used to guide this study. A comprehensive search was conducted using: a) online databases, b) grey literature, c) content experts to identify additional references, and d) searching reference lists of pertinent studies. All references were screened by two team members. References were included that met the following criteria: a) involved public health organizations (local, regional, national, and international); b) provided descriptions of strategies to support adaptation or delivery of routine public health measures alongside disaster response; and c) quantitative, qualitative, or descriptive designs. No restrictions were placed on language, publication status, publication date, or outcomes. Data on study characteristics, intervention/strategy, and key findings were independently extracted by two team members. Emergent themes were established through independent inductive analysis by two team members. Of 44,087 records identified, 17 studies were included in the review. Study designs of included studies varied: descriptive (n = 8); qualitative (n = 4); mixed-methods (n = 2); cross-sectional (n = 1); case report (n = 1); single-group pretest/post-test design (n = 1). Included studies were from North America (n = 10), Africa (n = 4), and Asia (n = 3) and addressed various public health disasters including natural disasters (n = 9), infectious disease epidemics (n = 5), armed conflict (n = 2) and hazardous material disasters (n = 1). Five emergent themes were identified on strategies to support the re-integration of core public health services: a) community engagement, b) community assessment, c) collaborative partnerships and coordination, d) workforce capacity development and allocation, and e) funding/resource enhancement. Emergent themes from this study can be used by public health organizations as a beginning understanding of strategies that can support the re-introduction of essential public health services and programs in COVID-19 recovery.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the public health workforce has experienced re-deployment from core functions such as health promotion, disease prevention, and health protection, to preventing and tracking the spread of COVID-19. With continued pandemic deployment coupled with the exacerbation of existing health disparities due to the pandemic, public health systems need to re-start the delivery of core public health programming alongside COVID-19 activities. The purpose of this scoping review was to identify strategies that support the re-integration of core public health programming alongside ongoing pandemic or emergency response.
METHODS
The Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews was used to guide this study. A comprehensive search was conducted using: a) online databases, b) grey literature, c) content experts to identify additional references, and d) searching reference lists of pertinent studies. All references were screened by two team members. References were included that met the following criteria: a) involved public health organizations (local, regional, national, and international); b) provided descriptions of strategies to support adaptation or delivery of routine public health measures alongside disaster response; and c) quantitative, qualitative, or descriptive designs. No restrictions were placed on language, publication status, publication date, or outcomes. Data on study characteristics, intervention/strategy, and key findings were independently extracted by two team members. Emergent themes were established through independent inductive analysis by two team members.
RESULTS
Of 44,087 records identified, 17 studies were included in the review. Study designs of included studies varied: descriptive (n = 8); qualitative (n = 4); mixed-methods (n = 2); cross-sectional (n = 1); case report (n = 1); single-group pretest/post-test design (n = 1). Included studies were from North America (n = 10), Africa (n = 4), and Asia (n = 3) and addressed various public health disasters including natural disasters (n = 9), infectious disease epidemics (n = 5), armed conflict (n = 2) and hazardous material disasters (n = 1). Five emergent themes were identified on strategies to support the re-integration of core public health services: a) community engagement, b) community assessment, c) collaborative partnerships and coordination, d) workforce capacity development and allocation, and e) funding/resource enhancement.
CONCLUSION
Emergent themes from this study can be used by public health organizations as a beginning understanding of strategies that can support the re-introduction of essential public health services and programs in COVID-19 recovery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35739496
doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13663-2
pii: 10.1186/s12889-022-13663-2
pmc: PMC9219400
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Journal Article
Review
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1244Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Am J Public Health. 2020 Nov;110(11):1605-1610
pubmed: 32816552
Glob Public Health. 2009;4(3):229-41
pubmed: 19384681
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2016 Aug;10(4):623-30
pubmed: 27322411
Healthc Manage Forum. 2020 Jul;33(4):174-177
pubmed: 32228317
BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 5;18(1):1344
pubmed: 30518348
Public Health Nurs. 2020 May;37(3):323-324
pubmed: 32281160
BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct 17;19(1):1310
pubmed: 31623594
Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105 Suppl 2:S252-9
pubmed: 25689203
Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69
pubmed: 20854677
J Glob Health. 2018 Dec;8(2):020601
pubmed: 30023054
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2019 Feb;13(1):53-62
pubmed: 30841953
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Nov;74(11):964-968
pubmed: 32535550
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 11;371(11):986-8
pubmed: 25207765
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016 Nov-Dec;22(6):529-36
pubmed: 27682724
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2016 Jun;10(3):454-62
pubmed: 27146833
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2015 Aug;9(4):403-8
pubmed: 25912850
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018 Mar/Apr;24(2):137-145
pubmed: 28257399
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2020 Jul 22;12(1):e1-e5
pubmed: 32787396
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2018 Oct;12(5):635-643
pubmed: 29388518
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013 Sep-Oct;19 Suppl 2:S49-54
pubmed: 23903395
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 May 27;11(6):5684-97
pubmed: 24871259
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Mar 1;34(2):83-91
pubmed: 30753437
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Apr;83:1-9
pubmed: 23465198
Glob Health Action. 2018;11(1):1522150
pubmed: 30270812
Nat Med. 2021 Jun;27(6):964-980
pubmed: 34002090
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 23;16(3):
pubmed: 30678041
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2005 Nov-Dec;20(6):428-31
pubmed: 16496629
Eval Program Plann. 2012 Nov;35(4):473-80
pubmed: 22459008
Public Health Rep. 2014;129 Suppl 4:166-72
pubmed: 25355988
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2008 Jul-Aug;33(4):235-41
pubmed: 18664905
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Jul 29;19(1):126
pubmed: 32727486
BMC Public Health. 2020 Oct 1;20(1):1482
pubmed: 32998729
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jun;5(6):
pubmed: 32522738
Confl Health. 2020 May 27;14:30
pubmed: 32514295
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013 Sep-Oct;19(5):428-35
pubmed: 23892378
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 28;15:432
pubmed: 25925775
Public Health Rep. 2014;129 Suppl 4:114-22
pubmed: 25355982
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Oct;97(4_Suppl):4-11
pubmed: 29064359