Efficacy of Vinflunine for Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Cancer after Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Pretreatment-A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis.
bladder cancer
chemotherapy
immune checkpoint inhibition
immunotherapy
metastatic urothelial carcinoma
vinflunine
Journal
Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Jun 2022
09 Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
20
03
2022
revised:
24
04
2022
accepted:
20
05
2022
entrez:
24
6
2022
pubmed:
25
6
2022
medline:
25
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are standard of care in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) ineligible for cisplatin, and as second-line therapy after platinum-based chemotherapy. To date, few data exist about the efficacy of the former second-line chemotherapeutic agent vinflunine after the failure of sequential platinum-based chemotherapy and ICI treatment. The aim of this analysis was to examine the efficacy of vinflunine in a post-ICI third- or later-line setting. In this retrospective German multicenter study, data of mUC patients treated with vinflunine were reviewed in six centers between February 2010 and December 2021. All of the 105 included patients had radiologic progression after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The objective was to describe the efficacy of vinflunine in terms of overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) for post-ICI and ICI-naïve patients, respectively. In our cohort, 61 patients (58.1%) had preceding immunotherapy before vinflunine administration, and 44 patients (41.9%) were ICI-naïve. Patients with ICI pretreatment showed an ORR of 22.4% compared to 15.6% within ICI-naïve patients ( This analysis supports the sequential use of vinflunine in post-ICI patients since the vinca-alkaloid retains a measurable clinical activity in these heavily pretreated patients. The therapeutic benefit may be higher than demonstrated in previous studies.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are standard of care in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) ineligible for cisplatin, and as second-line therapy after platinum-based chemotherapy. To date, few data exist about the efficacy of the former second-line chemotherapeutic agent vinflunine after the failure of sequential platinum-based chemotherapy and ICI treatment. The aim of this analysis was to examine the efficacy of vinflunine in a post-ICI third- or later-line setting.
METHODS
METHODS
In this retrospective German multicenter study, data of mUC patients treated with vinflunine were reviewed in six centers between February 2010 and December 2021. All of the 105 included patients had radiologic progression after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The objective was to describe the efficacy of vinflunine in terms of overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) for post-ICI and ICI-naïve patients, respectively.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In our cohort, 61 patients (58.1%) had preceding immunotherapy before vinflunine administration, and 44 patients (41.9%) were ICI-naïve. Patients with ICI pretreatment showed an ORR of 22.4% compared to 15.6% within ICI-naïve patients (
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This analysis supports the sequential use of vinflunine in post-ICI patients since the vinca-alkaloid retains a measurable clinical activity in these heavily pretreated patients. The therapeutic benefit may be higher than demonstrated in previous studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35740516
pii: cancers14122850
doi: 10.3390/cancers14122850
pmc: PMC9220857
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 13;14(2):
pubmed: 35053540
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Nov;121:123-129
pubmed: 31574417
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2019 Aug;140:80-87
pubmed: 31133463
Core Evid. 2018 Jan 24;13:1-12
pubmed: 29416444
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 10;28(11):1850-5
pubmed: 20231682
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2021 Sep 30;13:17588359211047352
pubmed: 34616491
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2021 Mar;21(3):299-313
pubmed: 33249937
Ann Oncol. 2022 Mar;33(3):244-258
pubmed: 34861372
Lancet. 2017 Jan 7;389(10064):67-76
pubmed: 27939400
Cell Death Differ. 2014 Jan;21(1):15-25
pubmed: 23787994
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jun 26;13(13):
pubmed: 34206980
World J Urol. 2020 Aug;38(8):1895-1904
pubmed: 31676912
Lung Cancer. 2017 Oct;112:90-95
pubmed: 29191606
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249
pubmed: 33538338
N Engl J Med. 2021 Mar 25;384(12):1125-1135
pubmed: 33577729
World J Urol. 2018 Nov;36(11):1703-1709
pubmed: 29549485
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Sep 20;27(27):4454-61
pubmed: 19687335
Front Oncol. 2020 Feb 14;10:70
pubmed: 32117727
N Engl J Med. 2020 Sep 24;383(13):1218-1230
pubmed: 32945632
Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2021 Jul 08;15:11795549211021667
pubmed: 34290538
Oncotarget. 2017 Aug 08;8(53):91795-91802
pubmed: 29207685