Anthracycline-Free Neoadjuvant Treatment in Patients with HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: Real-Life Use of Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab and Taxanes Association with an Exploratory Analysis of PIK3CA Mutational Status.
HER2-positive
PIK3CA
anthracyclines
breast cancer
neoadjuvant treatment
pertuzumab
taxanes
trastuzumab
Journal
Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Jun 2022
18 Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
21
05
2022
revised:
15
06
2022
accepted:
16
06
2022
entrez:
24
6
2022
pubmed:
25
6
2022
medline:
25
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
HER2 is considered one of the most traditional prognostic and predictive biomarkers in breast cancer. Literature data confirmed that the addition of pertuzumab to a standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy backbone (either with or without anthracyclines), in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive early breast cancer (EBC), leads to a higher pathological complete response (pCR) rate, which is known to correlate with a better prognosis. In this retrospective analysis, 47 consecutive patients with HER2-positive EBC received sequential anthracyclines and taxanes plus trastuzumab (ATH) or pertuzumab, trastuzumab and docetaxel (THP). Despite the limited sample size, this monocentric experience highlights the efficacy (in terms of pCR) and safety of THP in the neoadjuvant setting of HER2-positive EBC as an anthracycline-free approach. Given the role of PIK3CA as a prognostic and therapeutic target in breast cancer, tumors were also analyzed to assess the PIK3CA mutational status. Thirty-eight out of forty-seven patients were evaluated, and PIK3CA variants were identified in 21% of tumor samples: overall, one mutation was detected in exon 4 (2.6%), two in exon 9 (5.3%) and four in exon 20 (10.5%). Of note, one sample showed concurrent mutations in exons 9 (codon 545) and 20 (codon 1047). Among patients reaching pCR (n = 13), 38.5% were PIK3CA mutants; on the other hand, among those lacking pCR (n = 25), just 12% showed PIK3CA variants. Regarding THP-treated mutant patients (n = 5), 80% reached pCR (three hormone-receptor-negative, one hormone-receptor-positive). Interestingly, the only patient not achieving pCR had a tumor with two co-occurring PIK3CA mutations. In conclusion, this study provides new evidence about the efficacy and good safety profile of THP, compared to the ATH regimen, as an anthracycline-free neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive EBC. Further studies on larger/multicentric cohorts are planned for more in-depth analysis to confirm our molecular and clinical results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35740668
pii: cancers14123003
doi: 10.3390/cancers14123003
pmc: PMC9220864
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Oct 1;21(19):4365-72
pubmed: 25979484
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 16;380(20):1929-1940
pubmed: 31091374
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Nov 15;26(22):5843-5851
pubmed: 32843527
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr 20;33(12):1340-7
pubmed: 25559813
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr 20;33(12):1334-9
pubmed: 25559818
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022 Jun;20(6):691-722
pubmed: 35714673
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Dec;19(12):1630-1640
pubmed: 30413379
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Apr;156(2):361-70
pubmed: 26968397
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Nov;154(1):133-43
pubmed: 26450505
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jan;173(2):319-328
pubmed: 30324275
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Nov;85:133-145
pubmed: 28923573
Ann Oncol. 2016 Aug;27(8):1519-25
pubmed: 27177864
Ann Oncol. 2016 Aug;27(8):1368-72
pubmed: 27358378
Front Oncol. 2021 Oct 28;11:731148
pubmed: 34778044
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Aug;152(3):463-76
pubmed: 26105797
BMC Cancer. 2011 Jun 15;11:248
pubmed: 21676217
Cancer Discov. 2017 Aug;7(8):818-831
pubmed: 28572459
Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Aug 15;15(16):5049-59
pubmed: 19671852
Clin Breast Cancer. 2008 Feb;8(1):38-49
pubmed: 18501058
Br J Cancer. 2009 Nov 17;101(10):1676-82
pubmed: 19844234
Cancer Cell. 2007 Oct;12(4):395-402
pubmed: 17936563
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2021 Apr 20;13:17588359211009003
pubmed: 33959195
Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 Jun;29(6):633-42
pubmed: 23574264
Oncogene. 2008 Sep 18;27(41):5497-510
pubmed: 18794884
Nature. 2012 Oct 4;490(7418):61-70
pubmed: 23000897
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2021 Apr 03;13:17588359211006948
pubmed: 33868462
Oncologist. 2013;18(3):257-64
pubmed: 23475636
Ann Oncol. 2013 Sep;24(9):2278-84
pubmed: 23704196
Science. 2019 Nov 8;366(6466):714-723
pubmed: 31699932
Cancer Res. 2008 Aug 1;68(15):6084-91
pubmed: 18676830
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Nov;184(2):469-479
pubmed: 32876911
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):791-800
pubmed: 27179402
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jan;13(1):25-32
pubmed: 22153890
Cell. 2018 Aug 9;174(4):1034-1035
pubmed: 30096302
Thorac Cancer. 2018 May;9(5):571-579
pubmed: 29575819
Chin J Cancer. 2011 May;30(5):327-35
pubmed: 21527065
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jun 20;23(18):4179-91
pubmed: 15961765
Front Oncol. 2022 Apr 04;11:784985
pubmed: 35480699
Breast Cancer Res. 2017 Jul 27;19(1):87
pubmed: 28750640
Br J Cancer. 2013 May 14;108(9):1807-9
pubmed: 23612454
Lancet. 2010 Jan 30;375(9712):377-84
pubmed: 20113825
BMJ. 2021 Dec 21;375:e066381
pubmed: 34933868
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2021 Oct 8;7(1):134
pubmed: 34625570
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2020 Jun;26(4):912-917
pubmed: 31631811
J Breast Cancer. 2018 Dec;21(4):382-390
pubmed: 30607159
Ann Oncol. 2018 Mar 1;29(3):646-653
pubmed: 29253081
Intern Emerg Med. 2016 Feb;11(1):123-40
pubmed: 26712595
Ann Oncol. 2017 Mar 1;28(3):497-504
pubmed: 27831502