First Results of an External Quality Assessment (EQA) Scheme for Molecular, Serological and Antigenic Diagnostic Test for SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Lombardy Region (Northern Italy), 2020-2022.
SARS-CoV-2
SARS-CoV-2 direct antigens detection
SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid detection
anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody test
external quality assessment (EQA)
Journal
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Jun 2022
16 Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
24
05
2022
revised:
13
06
2022
accepted:
13
06
2022
entrez:
24
6
2022
pubmed:
25
6
2022
medline:
25
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
For diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection and for monitoring its spread, the implementation of external quality assessment (EQA) schemes is mandatory to assess and ensure a standard quality according to national and international guidelines. Here, we present the results of the 2020, 2021, 2022 EQA schemes in Lombardy region for assessing the quality of the diagnostic laboratories involved in SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. In the framework of the Quality Assurance Programs (QAPs), the routinely EQA schemes are managed by the regional reference centre for diagnostic laboratories quality (RRC-EQA) of the Lombardy region and are carried out by all the diagnostic laboratories. Three EQA programs were organized: (1) EQA of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid detection; (2) EQA of anti-SARS-CoV-2-antibody testing; (3) EQA of SARS-CoV-2 direct antigens detection. The percentage of concordance of 1938 molecular tests carried out within the SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid detection EQA was 97.7%. The overall concordance of 1875 tests carried out within the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody EQA was 93.9% (79.6% for IgM). The overall concordance of 1495 tests carried out within the SARS-CoV-2 direct antigens detection EQA was 85% and it was negatively impacted by the results obtained by the analysis of weak positive samples. In conclusion, the EQA schemes for assessing the accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis in the Lombardy region highlighted a suitable reproducibility and reliability of diagnostic assays, despite the heterogeneous landscape of SARS-CoV-2 tests and methods. Laboratory testing based on the detection of viral RNA in respiratory samples can be considered the gold standard for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35741293
pii: diagnostics12061483
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12061483
pmc: PMC9222140
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 25;6:CD013652
pubmed: 32584464
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 17;15(9):e0237694
pubmed: 32941461
J Med Virol. 2020 Oct;92(10):1724-1727
pubmed: 32227490
Clin Chim Acta. 2014 May 15;432:77-81
pubmed: 24389052
Am J Clin Pathol. 2020 Sep 8;154(4):475-478
pubmed: 32687172
Pathology. 2020 Dec;52(7):745-753
pubmed: 33131799
BMJ. 2020 Jul 1;370:m2516
pubmed: 32611558
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020 Dec;9(1):1393-1396
pubmed: 32552549
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021 Jul 30;59(12):2003-2009
pubmed: 34331847
Euro Surveill. 2020 Apr;25(14):
pubmed: 32290902
Viruses. 2020 May 26;12(6):
pubmed: 32466458
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 15;383(16):1522-1534
pubmed: 32558485
J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104537
pubmed: 32659712