Encode a Letter and Get Its Location for Free? Assessing Incidental Binding of Verbal and Spatial Features.
binding
short-term memory
spatial
verbal
working memory
Journal
Brain sciences
ISSN: 2076-3425
Titre abrégé: Brain Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101598646
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 May 2022
24 May 2022
Historique:
received:
20
03
2022
revised:
28
04
2022
accepted:
05
05
2022
entrez:
24
6
2022
pubmed:
25
6
2022
medline:
25
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Previous studies have demonstrated that when presented with a display of spatially arranged letters, participants seem to remember the letters' locations when letters are the focus of a recognition test, but do not remember letters' identity when locations are tested. This strong binding asymmetry suggests that encoding location may be obligatory when remembering letters, which requires explanation within theories of working memory. We report two studies in which participants focused either on remembering letters or locations for a short interval. At test, positive probes were either intact letter-location combinations or recombinations of an observed letter and another previously occupied location. Incidental binding is observed when intact probes are recognized more accurately or faster than recombined probes. Here, however, we observed no evidence of incidental binding of location to letter in either experiment, neither under conditions where participants focused on one feature exclusively for a block, nor where the to-be-remembered feature was revealed prior to encoding with a changing pre-cue, nor where the to-be-remembered feature was retro-cued and therefore unknown during encoding. Our results call into question the robustness of a strong, consistent binding asymmetry. They suggest that while incidental location-to-letter binding may sometimes occur, it is not obligatory.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35741572
pii: brainsci12060685
doi: 10.3390/brainsci12060685
pmc: PMC9221125
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Cogn. 2017 Dec 08;1(1):3
pubmed: 31517181
Mem Cognit. 2011 Jan;39(1):24-36
pubmed: 21264632
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Nov;62(11):2235-51
pubmed: 19370452
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 May;31(3):412-27
pubmed: 15910128
Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Feb;24(1):87-114; discussion 114-85
pubmed: 11515286
Conscious Cogn. 2011 Sep;20(3):920-7
pubmed: 21273096
Nat Neurosci. 2000 Jan;3(1):85-90
pubmed: 10607400
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Sep;62(9):1696-705
pubmed: 19391042
Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):2807-15
pubmed: 19840857
Mem Cognit. 2013 Apr;41(3):378-91
pubmed: 23254536
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(3):433-41
pubmed: 25482047
Mem Cognit. 2006 Dec;34(8):1704-19
pubmed: 17489296
J Cogn. 2021 Aug 27;4(1):46
pubmed: 34514317
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Aug;83(6):2377-2393
pubmed: 33864204
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Nov;59(11):1867-74
pubmed: 16987778
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Mar;41(2):325-47
pubmed: 25089739
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jul;40(4):1096-109
pubmed: 24548321
Nature. 1997 Nov 20;390(6657):279-81
pubmed: 9384378
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Jun;36(3):543-64
pubmed: 20515188
Mem Cognit. 2013 Nov;41(8):1212-27
pubmed: 23716004
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Apr;54(2):556-573
pubmed: 34322854
Cognition. 2011 Apr;119(1):114-9
pubmed: 21262509
Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:1-29
pubmed: 21961947
Psychol Sci. 2015 Feb;26(2):203-10
pubmed: 25564523
Neuropsychology. 2008 Jan;22(1):85-99
pubmed: 18211158
Mem Cognit. 2018 Aug;46(6):955-968
pubmed: 29777438
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Jan;62(1):26-32
pubmed: 18622886