Point-of-Care Testing Using a Neuropsychology Pocketcard Set: A Preliminary Validation Study.
aphasia
epilepsy
executive functions
neglect
neuropsychology
pocketcard
stroke
Journal
Brain sciences
ISSN: 2076-3425
Titre abrégé: Brain Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101598646
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 May 2022
27 May 2022
Historique:
received:
02
05
2022
revised:
21
05
2022
accepted:
25
05
2022
entrez:
24
6
2022
pubmed:
25
6
2022
medline:
25
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Neurocognitive screening instruments usually require printed sheets and additional accessories, and can be unsuitable for low-threshold use during ward rounds or emergency workup, especially in patients with motor impairments. Here, we test the utility of a newly developed neuropsychology pocketcard set for point-of-care testing. For aphasia and neglect assessment, modified versions of the Language Screening Test and the Bells Test were validated on 63 and 60 acute stroke unit patients, respectively, against expert clinical evaluation and the original pen-and-paper Bells Test. The pocketcard aphasia test achieved an excellent area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88−1, p < 0.001). Using an optimal cut-off of ≥2 mistakes, sensitivity was 91% and specificity was 81%. The pocketcard Bells Task, measured against the clinical neglect diagnosis, achieved higher sensitivity (89%) and specificity (88%) than the original paper-based instrument (78% and 75%, respectively). Separately, executive function tests (modified versions of the Trail Making Test [TMT] A and B, custom Stroop color naming task, vigilance ‘A’ Montreal Cognitive Assessment item) were validated on 44 inpatients with epilepsy against the EpiTrack® test battery. Pocketcard TMT performance was significantly correlated with the original EpiTrack® versions (A: r = 0.64, p < 0.001; B: r = 0.75, p < 0.001). AUCs for the custom Stroop task, TMT A and TMT B for discriminating between normal and pathological EpiTrack® scores were acceptable, excellent and outstanding, respectively. Quick point-of-care testing using a pocketcard set is feasible and yields diagnostically valid information.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35741580
pii: brainsci12060694
doi: 10.3390/brainsci12060694
pmc: PMC9221077
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Thorac Oncol. 2010 Sep;5(9):1315-6
pubmed: 20736804
Epilepsy Behav. 2005 Dec;7(4):708-14
pubmed: 16266826
Stroke. 2007 Sep;38(9):2556-62
pubmed: 17673707
Stroke. 2011 May;42(5):1224-9
pubmed: 21487118
Stroke. 2017 Feb;48(2):513-519
pubmed: 28077454
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 Sep;90(9):1070-1071
pubmed: 30674542
Acta Neurol Scand. 2021 Apr;143(4):375-382
pubmed: 33368189
Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2015 Jun;21(3 Behavioral Neurology and Neuropsychiatry):646-59
pubmed: 26039846
J Neurol. 2017 Feb;264(2):211-220
pubmed: 27260296
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006 Mar;20(1):42-8
pubmed: 16467277
J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Dec;16(6):1183-8
pubmed: 20695956
Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2016 Apr 20;6(1):27-31
pubmed: 27194999
Clin Rehabil. 2006 Jul;20(7):623-34
pubmed: 16894806
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9
pubmed: 15817019
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 22;9:2745
pubmed: 30723446