Brain Asymmetry and Its Effects on Gait Strategies in Hemiplegic Patients: New Rehabilitative Conceptions.

brain asymmetry gait analysis hemiparetic hemiplegia ischaemic stroke retrospective cohort study

Journal

Brain sciences
ISSN: 2076-3425
Titre abrégé: Brain Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101598646

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Jun 2022
Historique:
received: 26 05 2022
revised: 08 06 2022
accepted: 17 06 2022
entrez: 24 6 2022
pubmed: 25 6 2022
medline: 25 6 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Brain asymmetry is connected with motor performance, suggesting that hemiparetic patients have different gait patterns depending on the side of the lesion. This retrospective cohort study aims to further investigate the difference between right and left hemiplegia in order to assess whether the injured side can influence the patient’s clinical characteristics concerning gait, thus providing insights for new personalized rehabilitation strategies. The data from 33 stroke patients (17 with left and 16 with right hemiplegia) were retrospectively compared with each other and with a control group composed of 20 unaffected age-matched individuals. The 3D gait analysis was used to assess kinematic data and spatio-temporal parameters. Compared to left hemiplegic patients, right hemiplegic patients showed worse spatio-temporal parameters (p < 0.05) and better kinematic parameters (p < 0.05). Both pathological groups were characterized by abnormal gait parameters in comparison with the control group (p < 0.05). These findings show an association between the side of the lesion—right or left—and the different stroke patients’ gait patterns: left hemiplegic patients show better spatio-temporal parameters, whereas right hemiplegic patients show better segmentary motor performances. Therefore, further studies may develop and assess new personalized rehabilitation strategies considering the injured hemisphere and brain asymmetry.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35741683
pii: brainsci12060798
doi: 10.3390/brainsci12060798
pmc: PMC9220897
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Ministero della Salute
ID : Ricerca Corrente

Références

Lancet. 1991 Jun 22;337(8756):1521-6
pubmed: 1675378
Brain Res. 2009 Nov 17;1298:78-91
pubmed: 19728993
J Neurosci. 2021 Nov 3;41(44):9112-9128
pubmed: 34556488
Neurology. 2004 Aug 10;63(3):468-74
pubmed: 15304577
Gait Posture. 2009 Oct;30(3):265-9
pubmed: 19632117
Brain. 2014 Apr;137(Pt 4):e268
pubmed: 24065724
Int J Rehabil Res. 2020 Mar;43(1):69-75
pubmed: 31855899
Front Physiol. 2018 Aug 02;9:1021
pubmed: 30127749
Lancet. 2014 Jan 18;383(9913):245-54
pubmed: 24449944
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Oct;20(10):795-820
pubmed: 34487721
Gait Posture. 2005 Aug;22(1):51-6
pubmed: 15996592
J Biomech. 2018 Jul 25;76:68-73
pubmed: 29853318
Exp Brain Res. 2010 Apr;201(4):753-61
pubmed: 19949780
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:716042
pubmed: 26583129
N Engl J Med. 2005 Apr 21;352(16):1677-84
pubmed: 15843670
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2011 Dec 13;8:66
pubmed: 22165907
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Apr 23;100(16):e25212
pubmed: 33879656
Neurology. 1996 Aug;47(2):388-92
pubmed: 8757009
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 Jan-Feb;22(1):4-21
pubmed: 17507644
J Biomech. 2020 Jan 23;99:109575
pubmed: 31870656
Nature. 2012 Mar 14;483(7389):260-3
pubmed: 22422242
J Rehabil Med. 2021 May 18;53(5):jrm00192
pubmed: 33710352
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Apr;28(4):954-962
pubmed: 30630757
PM R. 2014 Jul;6(7):635-42
pubmed: 24451335
Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 24;9(1):584
pubmed: 30679750
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(46):e18023
pubmed: 31725678
Stroke. 2020 Oct;51(10):2892-2894
pubmed: 32912098
Physiother Theory Pract. 2022 Jan;38(1):28-35
pubmed: 32090670
Brain. 2013 Apr;136(Pt 4):1288-303
pubmed: 23358602
Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2005 Mar;35(3):229-34
pubmed: 15875485
J Neurol Sci. 2014 Oct 15;345(1-2):159-63
pubmed: 25073571
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Feb 02;:1-6
pubmed: 35107054
Cereb Cortex. 2012 Jun;22(6):1407-19
pubmed: 21878488
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2004;104(3):8-12
pubmed: 15071838
Gait Posture. 2016 Sep;49:382-387
pubmed: 27497756
Hum Mov Sci. 2018 Feb;57:374-387
pubmed: 28993013
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Nov;34(11):4280-5
pubmed: 24095856
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1204-1222
pubmed: 33069326

Auteurs

Luca Vismara (L)

Division of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, 28824 Verbania, Italy.
Department of Neurosciences "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.

Veronica Cimolin (V)

Division of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, 28824 Verbania, Italy.
Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy.

Francesca Buffone (F)

Principles and Practice of Clinical Research (PPCR), Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health-ECPE, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Matteo Bigoni (M)

Division of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, 28824 Verbania, Italy.

Daniela Clerici (D)

Division of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, 28824 Verbania, Italy.

Serena Cerfoglio (S)

Division of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, 28824 Verbania, Italy.
Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy.

Manuela Galli (M)

Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy.

Alessandro Mauro (A)

Division of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, 28824 Verbania, Italy.
Department of Neurosciences "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.

Classifications MeSH