Uterine Septum with or without Hysteroscopic Metroplasty: Impact on Fertility and Obstetrical Outcomes-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Research.
infertility
live birth rate
metroplasty
pregnancy rate
preterm labour
recurrent miscarriage
spontaneous abortion
uterine septum
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Jun 2022
08 Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
02
05
2022
revised:
24
05
2022
accepted:
26
05
2022
entrez:
24
6
2022
pubmed:
25
6
2022
medline:
25
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Objective: we performed a systematic review/meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of septate uterus and hysteroscopic metroplasty on pregnancy rate-(PR), live birth rate-(LBR), spontaneous abortion-(SA) and preterm labor (PL) in infertile/recurrent miscarriage-(RM) patients. Data sources: a literature search of relevant papers was conducted using electronic bibliographic databases (Medline, Scopus, Embase, Science direct). Study eligibility criteria: we included in this meta-analysis all types of observational studies that evaluated the clinical impact of the uterine septum and its resection (hysteroscopic metroplasty) on reproductive and obstetrics outcomes. The population included were patients with a diagnosis of infertility or recurrent pregnancy loss. Study appraisal and synthesis methods: outcomes were evaluated according to three subgroups: (i) Women with untreated uterine septum versus women without septum (controls); (ii) Women with treated uterine septum versus women with untreated septum (controls); (iii) Women before and after septum removal. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the outcome measures. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the depth of the septum. Sources of heterogeneity were explored by meta-regression analysis according to specific features: assisted reproductive technology/spontaneous conception, study design and quality of papers included Results: data from 38 studies were extracted. (i) septum versus no septum: a lower PR and LBR were associated with septate uterus vs. controls (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.27−0.76; p < 0.0001; and OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.12−0.39; p < 0.0001); a higher proportion of SA and PL was associated with septate uterus vs. controls (OR 4.29, 95% CI 2.90−6.36; p < 0.0001; OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.52−4.31; p = 0.0004). (ii) treated versus untreated septum: PR and PL were not different in removed vs. unremoved septum(OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.49−2.49; p = 0.82 and OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.35−1.86; p = 0.62); a lower proportion of SA was associated with removed vs. unremoved septum (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.21−1.04; p = 0.001); (iii) before-after septum removal: the proportion of LBR was higher after the removal of septum (OR 49.58, 95% CI 29.93−82.13; p < 0.0001) and the proportion of SA and PL was lower after the removal of the septum (OR 0.02, 95% CI 0.02−0.04; p < 0.000 and OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.03−0.08; p < 0.0001) Conclusions: the results show the detrimental effect of the uterine septum on PR, LBR, SA and PL. Its treatment reduces the rate of SA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35743362
pii: jcm11123290
doi: 10.3390/jcm11123290
pmc: PMC9224595
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Références
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jun;37(6):727-32
pubmed: 21337662
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022 Apr;29(4):465-475
pubmed: 34648934
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Mar;289(3):671-6
pubmed: 24026089
Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Nov;21(5):700-5
pubmed: 20864409
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Jan-Feb;20(1):22-42
pubmed: 23312243
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007 Aug;98(2):129-33
pubmed: 17588572
Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Dec;98(6):1099-103
pubmed: 11755560
Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Feb;67(2):253-7
pubmed: 2935760
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2016;2016:3086036
pubmed: 27110088
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Dec;115(3):260-3
pubmed: 21945050
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1998 Nov;63(2):159-62
pubmed: 9856322
Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1539-58
pubmed: 12111919
Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Dec;29(6):665-83
pubmed: 25444500
J Reprod Med. 1995 Oct;40(10):684-8
pubmed: 8551467
Hum Reprod. 2020 Jul 1;35(7):1722
pubmed: 32472131
Fertil Steril. 1979 Jul;32(1):40-6
pubmed: 456629
Hum Reprod. 2020 Nov 1;35(11):2627-2629
pubmed: 32968815
BJOG. 2019 Sep;126(10):1192-1199
pubmed: 31004459
ANZ J Surg. 2003 Sep;73(9):712-6
pubmed: 12956787
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001 Feb;8(1):111-6
pubmed: 11172125
Fertil Steril. 2000 Jan;73(1):1-14
pubmed: 10632403
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 May;113(2):128-30
pubmed: 21392763
Fertil Steril. 1996 Apr;65(4):750-2
pubmed: 8654633
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 Oct;146(2):184-7
pubmed: 18524455
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2007 May;62(5):335-47; quiz 353-4
pubmed: 17425812
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;136(2):417-419
pubmed: 32649503
Acta Eur Fertil. 1989 Sep-Oct;20(5):321-5
pubmed: 2636810
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 Jul-Aug;18(4):449-54
pubmed: 21621483
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2000 Jan;88(1):81-4
pubmed: 10659922
Hum Reprod Update. 2001 Mar-Apr;7(2):161-74
pubmed: 11284660
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Dec;205(6):558.e1-5
pubmed: 21907963
Biometrics. 2000 Jun;56(2):455-63
pubmed: 10877304
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Feb;25(2):199-208
pubmed: 28803811
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Feb;283(2):273-9
pubmed: 20041257
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Mar;155(1):54-7
pubmed: 21185112
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(18):2141-4
pubmed: 25354290
Fertil Steril. 1992 Jan;57(1):81-4
pubmed: 1730335
Fertil Steril. 2009 Jun;91(6):2643-9
pubmed: 18565515
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2010;37(4):287-9
pubmed: 21355459
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 May;303(5):1131-1142
pubmed: 33550465
Fertil Steril. 1988 Jun;49(6):944-55
pubmed: 3371491
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;51(1):110-117
pubmed: 29055072
Fertil Steril. 2016 Sep 1;106(3):530-40
pubmed: 27235766
Photomed Laser Surg. 2006 Oct;24(5):625
pubmed: 17069494
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Apr;34(3):235-7
pubmed: 24483130
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Nov-Dec;22(6S):S110-S111
pubmed: 27678590
Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 May;24(5):576-82
pubmed: 22417666
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul;98(30):e16623
pubmed: 31348312
Hum Reprod. 2021 Apr 20;36(5):1166-1170
pubmed: 33793818
Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Mar;20(3):416-22
pubmed: 20093084
Fertil Steril. 2010 Apr;93(6):1983-8
pubmed: 19249757
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Oct;38(4):371-82
pubmed: 21830244
Hum Reprod. 2021 Apr 20;36(5):1260-1267
pubmed: 33793794
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 05;12:CD009461
pubmed: 30521679
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2002 Jul;266(3):157-9
pubmed: 12197556
JAMA. 2000 Apr 19;283(15):2008-12
pubmed: 10789670
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004 May;11(2):240-4
pubmed: 15200782
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2006 Feb;28(2):156-9
pubmed: 16643719
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2003 Oct;268(4):289-92
pubmed: 14504871
Acta Eur Fertil. 1983 Sep-Oct;14(5):311-8
pubmed: 6673450
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Mar-Apr;20(2):178-84
pubmed: 23317507
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 Feb;35(2):155-8
pubmed: 25058627
Hum Reprod. 2013 Aug;28(8):2032-44
pubmed: 23771171
Fertil Steril. 2009 Jun;91(6):2628-31
pubmed: 18571168
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Sep - Oct;27(6):1287-1294
pubmed: 31812613
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1997 May;4(3):311-7
pubmed: 9154779
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Apr;105(1):25-8
pubmed: 19111303
Hum Reprod. 1998 May;13(5):1188-93
pubmed: 9647545
Am J Surg. 1946 Jan;71:106-66
pubmed: 21028476
Hum Reprod. 1997 Oct;12(10):2277-81
pubmed: 9402295
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jan;172(1 Pt 1):105-7
pubmed: 7847514
Reprod Biomed Online. 2007 Mar;14(3):335-40
pubmed: 17359587
Hum Reprod Update. 2000 Jan-Feb;6(1):75-9
pubmed: 10711832
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;51(1):101-109
pubmed: 29024135
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;213(4):545.e1-4
pubmed: 26070711
Hum Reprod. 1993 Jan;8(1):122-6
pubmed: 8458914
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 May-Jun;23(4):557-66
pubmed: 26829218