Andexanet Alfa for Reversal of Factor Xa Inhibitors in Intracranial Hemorrhage: Observational Cohort Study.
andexanet alfa
antidote
antithrombotic drugs
coagulants
factor Xa inhibitors
hemorrhage
hemostasis
intracranial hemorrhages
magnetic resonance imaging
thrombosis
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Jun 2022
13 Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
16
05
2022
revised:
31
05
2022
accepted:
10
06
2022
entrez:
24
6
2022
pubmed:
25
6
2022
medline:
25
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Background: Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is associated with high mortality and morbidity, especially in patients under anticoagulative treatment. Andexanet alfa (AA) is a modified recombinant form of human factor Xa (FXa) developed for reversal of FXa-inhibitors, e.g., in the event of ICH, but experience is still limited. Methods: This monocentric retrospective observational cohort study included 46 patients with acute FXa-inhibitor-associated non-traumatic ICH (FXa-I-ICH) of whom 23 were treated with AA within 12 h after symptom onset, compared to 23 patients with usual care (UC). Volumetrically analyzed hematoma expansion (HE) in brain imaging, clinical outcome and incidence of adverse events were analyzed. Results: All patients (mean age 79.8 ± 7.2 years) were effectively anticoagulated. The cohort included severely ill patients with large hematoma volumes (median 20.4, IQR 7.8−39.0 mL). Efficacy, as assessed by HE in imaging, was very good in the AA-group. There was no (0.0%) relevant HE (>33%) in contrast to UC-group (26.1%). Nevertheless, we observed a high incidence of thromboembolic events (30.4% vs. 4.4%) and non-favorable outcomes (death/palliative condition) in 43.5% vs. 26.1%. Conclusions: There was no HE in the volumetric neuroimaging assessment in the AA-group, but clinical outcomes remained often worse. Large randomized trials for the use of AA in patients with acute FXa-inhibitor-associated ICH are needed to investigate the clinical outcome in consideration of the rates of thromboembolism.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35743469
pii: jcm11123399
doi: 10.3390/jcm11123399
pmc: PMC9224862
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Neurology. 2008 Sep 30;71(14):1084-9
pubmed: 18824672
Neurocrit Care. 2021 Aug;35(1):255-261
pubmed: 33403588
Stroke. 2010 Feb;41(2):307-12
pubmed: 20044534
BMC Neurol. 2012 Mar 08;12:14
pubmed: 22400994
Stroke. 2009 Oct;40(10):3393-5
pubmed: 19679846
J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Jul;18(7):1637-1647
pubmed: 32291874
JAMA. 2015 Feb 24;313(8):824-36
pubmed: 25710659
Int J Stroke. 2020 Aug;15(6):609-618
pubmed: 31955706
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2021 Aug 27;14:17562864211030363
pubmed: 34471423
N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 6;373(6):511-20
pubmed: 26095746
Crit Care. 2019 Jun 6;23(1):206
pubmed: 31171018
Stroke. 2009 Jun;40(6):2068-72
pubmed: 19359645
Stroke. 2015 Jul;46(7):2032-60
pubmed: 26022637
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Jan;10(1):8
pubmed: 35242853
Neurology. 2021 Jun 1;96(22):e2704-e2713
pubmed: 33875557
N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 17;373(25):2413-24
pubmed: 26559317
Lancet Neurol. 2016 May;15(6):566-73
pubmed: 27302126
J Physiother. 2014 Mar;60(1):61
pubmed: 24856948
N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 4;380(14):1326-1335
pubmed: 30730782
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;49(3):244-252
pubmed: 32585668
Curr Drug Targets. 2017;18(12):1329-1344
pubmed: 28378693
J Stroke. 2018 Sep;20(3):292-301
pubmed: 30309225
Stroke. 2021 Jun;52(6):2096-2105
pubmed: 33966491
Phys Med Biol. 2007 Mar 21;52(6):N99-109
pubmed: 17327646
Int J Stroke. 2014 Oct;9(7):840-55
pubmed: 25156220