Cost-Utility Analysis of Dupilumab for the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) in Italy.
CRSwNP
cost–utility analysis
dupilumab
Journal
Journal of personalized medicine
ISSN: 2075-4426
Titre abrégé: J Pers Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101602269
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Jun 2022
10 Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
03
05
2022
revised:
06
06
2022
accepted:
07
06
2022
entrez:
24
6
2022
pubmed:
25
6
2022
medline:
25
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The objective of this analysis was to estimate the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of dupilumab as an add-on treatment to best supportive care (BSC), versus BSC alone, in Italy for severe uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). A simulation of outcomes and costs was undertaken using a 1-year decision tree, followed by a lifetime horizon Markov model. Clinical data were derived from a pooled analysis of two studies (SINUS-24 NCT02912468 and SINUS-52 NCT02898454). The Italian National Healthcare Service (NHS) perspective was considered. Model robustness was tested through sensitivity analyses. In the base-case analysis, treatment with dupilumab + BSC resulted in an increase in quality of life-adjusted survival (+1.02 quality-adjusted life years (QALY-gained)), compared to the BSC alone. The resulted ICUR was €21,817 per QALY-gained and it is below the acceptability threshold commonly used in Italy. Both one-way deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of base-case results. The cost-utility analysis showed that dupilumab, as an add-on treatment to BSC, is a cost-effective therapeutic alternative to BSC in the treatment of patients with severe uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, confirming that it is economically sustainable.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35743736
pii: jpm12060951
doi: 10.3390/jpm12060951
pmc: PMC9225649
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Laryngoscope. 2019 Sep;129(9):1969-1975
pubmed: 30720213
Laryngoscope. 2018 Jan;128(1):23-30
pubmed: 28600803
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016 Jul-Aug;4(4):565-72
pubmed: 27393770
Rhinology. 2021 Jun 1;59(3):301-311
pubmed: 33847325
Health Econ. 2004 Sep;13(9):873-84
pubmed: 15362179
World Allergy Organ J. 2021 Nov 01;14(10):100592
pubmed: 34786034
Rhinology. 2019 Oct 1;57(5):343-351
pubmed: 31318362
Value Health. 2012 Jul-Aug;15(5):708-15
pubmed: 22867780
Value Health. 2012 Sep-Oct;15(6):843-50
pubmed: 22999134
Allergy. 2019 Dec;74(12):2312-2319
pubmed: 31090937
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Jan;147(1):29-36
pubmed: 33227318
Allergy. 2022 Feb;77(2):670-674
pubmed: 34626497
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Jun 08;8:288
pubmed: 28642700
Rhinology. 2019 Feb 1;57(1):32-42
pubmed: 29911211
World Allergy Organ J. 2014 Oct 27;7(1):25
pubmed: 25379119
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2015 Nov;5(11):1018-27
pubmed: 26140502
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 4;381(1):55-63
pubmed: 31269366
Bull World Health Organ. 2015 Feb 1;93(2):118-24
pubmed: 25883405
Laryngoscope. 2011 Dec;121(12):2672-8
pubmed: 22034223
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2022 Feb;42(1):1-16
pubmed: 34297014
Rhinology. 2020 Jun 1;58(3):213-217
pubmed: 32415826
Rhinology. 2020 Feb 20;58(Suppl S29):1-464
pubmed: 32077450
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2021 Jan;35(1):77-85
pubmed: 32564684
Allergy. 2021 Jan;76(1):191-209
pubmed: 32656802
Lancet. 2019 Nov 2;394(10209):1638-1650
pubmed: 31543428
J Asthma Allergy. 2016 Mar 14;9:45-53
pubmed: 27042129
J Asthma Allergy. 2021 Feb 11;14:127-134
pubmed: 33603409
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014 Nov;4(11):871-6
pubmed: 25145900
Laryngoscope. 2016 Mar;126(3):570-4
pubmed: 26371457
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016 Feb;6 Suppl 1:S22-209
pubmed: 26889651