Relation between Plasma Trough Concentration of Pazopanib and Progression-Free Survival in Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients.
Pazopanib
pharmacokinetics
progression-free survival
soft-tissue sarcoma
toxicity
Journal
Pharmaceutics
ISSN: 1999-4923
Titre abrégé: Pharmaceutics
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101534003
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Jun 2022
09 Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
03
05
2022
revised:
04
06
2022
accepted:
07
06
2022
entrez:
24
6
2022
pubmed:
25
6
2022
medline:
25
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Background: Pazopanib (PAZ) is an oral angiogenesis inhibitor approved to treat soft tissue sarcoma (STS) but associated with a large interpatient pharmacokinetic (PK) variability and narrow therapeutic index. We aimed to define the specific threshold of PAZ trough concentration (Cmin) associated with better progression-free survival (PFS) in STS patients. Methods: In this observational study, PAZ Cmin was monitored over the treatment course. For the primary endpoint, the 3-month PFS in STS was analyzed with logistic regression. Second, we performed exposure−overall survival (OS) (Cox model plus Kaplan−Meier analysis/log-rank test) and exposure−toxicity analyses. Results: Ninety-five STS patients were eligible for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) assessment. In the multivariable analysis, PAZ Cmin < 27 mg/L was independently associated with a risk of progression at 3 months (odds ratio (OR) 4.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.47−12.12), p = 0.008). A higher average of PAZ Cmin over the first 3 months was associated with a higher risk of grade 3−4 toxicities according to the NCI-CTCAE version 5.0 (OR 1.07 per 1 mg/L increase, CI95 (1.02−1.13), p = 0.007). Conclusion: PAZ Cmin ≥ 27 mg/L was independently associated with improved 3-month PFS in STS patients. Pharmacokinetically-guided dosing could be helpful to optimize the clinical management of STS patients in daily clinical practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35745797
pii: pharmaceutics14061224
doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14061224
pmc: PMC9231369
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Oct 15;23(20):6377
pubmed: 29030334
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Mar 1;25(5):1479-1485
pubmed: 30765389
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2011 Mar;77(3):163-71
pubmed: 20456972
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021 Sep 15;14(9):
pubmed: 34577627
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Aug 31;13:6833-6845
pubmed: 34512023
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jul 1;27(19):3141-7
pubmed: 19451435
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2010 Jul;66(2):357-71
pubmed: 19967539
Lancet. 2012 May 19;379(9829):1879-86
pubmed: 22595799
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017 Mar;56(3):293-303
pubmed: 27534647
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017 Dec;80(6):1171-1178
pubmed: 29051995
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Oct;11(10):962-72
pubmed: 20851682
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Sep;23(5):387-398
pubmed: 29706106
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Dec 1;22(23):5738-5746
pubmed: 27470967
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Apr;77(4):441-464
pubmed: 33165648
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Feb 20;28(6):1061-8
pubmed: 20100962
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2020 Jul;59(7):941-948
pubmed: 32020530
Oncologist. 2012;17(9):1204-12
pubmed: 22752067
Oncologist. 2010;15(6):539-47
pubmed: 20511320
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 16;147(8):W163-94
pubmed: 17938389
Invest New Drugs. 2012 Oct;30(5):2046-9
pubmed: 22038662
Ann Oncol. 2016 Nov;27(11):2103-2110
pubmed: 27601237
Br J Cancer. 2014 Feb 18;110(4):888-93
pubmed: 24366297
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017 Sep;56(9):987-997
pubmed: 28185218
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2015 Feb;75(2):365-71
pubmed: 25533184
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Aug;13(8):827-37
pubmed: 22759480
Ther Drug Monit. 2015 Jun;37(3):331-8
pubmed: 25271729
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Apr;17(2):e306-e313
pubmed: 30598361
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Aug;18(8):1022-1039
pubmed: 28687376
Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Jun 15;15(12):4220-7
pubmed: 19509175
Int J Clin Oncol. 2022 May 30;:
pubmed: 35635652
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug 20;31(24):3034-43
pubmed: 23857966
Br J Cancer. 2014 Nov 11;111(10):1909-16
pubmed: 25349968
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Feb;32(1):98-107
pubmed: 29055166