Tracking Self-Control - Task Performance and Pupil Size in a Go/No-Go Inhibition Task.
behavioral and self-report measures
psychophysiological
pupil diameter
response inhibition
self-control
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
07
04
2022
accepted:
09
05
2022
entrez:
24
6
2022
pubmed:
25
6
2022
medline:
25
6
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There is an ongoing debate about how to test and operationalize self-control. This limited understanding is in large part due to a variety of different tests and measures used to assess self-control, as well as the lack of empirical studies examining the temporal dynamics during the exertion of self-control. In order to track changes that occur over the course of exposure to a self-control task, we investigate and compare behavioral, subjective, and physiological indicators during the exertion of self-control. Participants completed both a task requiring inhibitory control (Go/No-Go task) and a control task (two-choice task). Behavioral performance and pupil size were measured during the tasks. Subjective vitality was measured before and after the tasks. While pupil size and subjective vitality showed similar trajectories in the two tasks, behavioral performance decreased in the inhibitory control-demanding task, but not in the control task. However, behavioral, subjective, and physiological measures were not significantly correlated. These results suggest that there is a disconnect between different measures of self-control with high intra- and interindividual variability. Theoretical and methodological implications for self-control theory and future empirical work are discussed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35747671
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.915016
pmc: PMC9211021
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
915016Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Timme, Wolff, Englert and Brand.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Dec;36(6):697-8; discussion 707-26
pubmed: 24304795
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2017 Jul 25;40:99-124
pubmed: 28375769
Cogn Emot. 2021 Aug;35(5):1018-1028
pubmed: 33745412
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1964 Sep 10;117:142-56
pubmed: 14196638
Psychol Sci. 2021 Oct;32(10):1566-1581
pubmed: 34520296
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Jun;42(6):878-889
pubmed: 26752733
J Pers. 1997 Sep;65(3):529-65
pubmed: 9327588
Percept Mot Skills. 2014 Aug;119(1):237-53
pubmed: 25153752
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Sep;15(5):1272-1283
pubmed: 32697921
Psychophysiology. 2018 Mar;55(3):
pubmed: 28390090
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Jul;11(4):546-73
pubmed: 27474142
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 25;13(6):e0199554
pubmed: 29940020
JMIR Serious Games. 2020 Sep 8;8(3):e17810
pubmed: 32897233
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Jul;23(7):1587-96
pubmed: 20666595
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Dec;36(6):661-79
pubmed: 24304775
Neuron. 2013 Jul 24;79(2):217-40
pubmed: 23889930
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Aug;136(3):389-413
pubmed: 17696690
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 May;74(5):1252-65
pubmed: 9599441
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 09;7:136
pubmed: 26903932
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Feb 4;123:159-168
pubmed: 29601888
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):2005-2015
pubmed: 29435963
Psychol Bull. 2010 Jul;136(4):495-525
pubmed: 20565167
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 26;8:1672
pubmed: 29018390
Psychol Rev. 2018 Oct;125(5):689-713
pubmed: 29963873
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Jul;11(4):574-5
pubmed: 27474143
Psychol Res. 2021 Feb;85(1):397-407
pubmed: 31321518
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2019 May;23(2):107-131
pubmed: 29591537
Psychophysiology. 2015 Mar;52(3):305-15
pubmed: 25263028
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2011 Nov;15(4):352-66
pubmed: 21685152
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2010 May;10(2):252-69
pubmed: 20498349
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2012 May;16(2):143-53
pubmed: 21896791