Temperature-controlled high-power short-duration ablation with 90 W for 4 s: outcome, safety, biophysical characteristics and cranial MRI findings in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation.
Ablation
Atrial fibrillation
High-power short duration
RF ablation
Journal
Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing
ISSN: 1572-8595
Titre abrégé: J Interv Card Electrophysiol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9708966
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2022
Nov 2022
Historique:
received:
31
10
2021
accepted:
31
01
2022
pubmed:
25
6
2022
medline:
10
11
2022
entrez:
24
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
High-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is highly efficient and safe while reducing procedure and RF time in pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The QDot™ catheter is a novel contact force ablation catheter that allows automated flow and power adjustments depending on the local tissue temperature to maintain a target temperature during 90 W/4 s lesions. We analysed intraprocedural data and periprocedural safety using the QDot-catheter in patients undergoing PVI for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). We included n = 48 patients undergoing PVI with the QDot-catheter with a temperature-controlled HPSD ablation mode with 90 W/4 s (TC-HPSD). If focal reconnection occurred besides repeat ablation, the ablation mode was changed to 50 W/15 s (QMode). N = 23 patients underwent cerebral MRI to detect silent cerebral lesions. Mean RF time was 8.1 ± 2.8 min, and procedure duration was 84.5 ± 30 min. The overall maximal measured catheter tip temperature was 52.0 °C ± 4.6 °C, mean overall applied current was 871 mA ± 44 mA and overall applied energy was 316 J ± 47 J. The mean local impedance drop was 12.1 ± 2.4 Ohms. During adenosine challenge, n = 14 (29%) patients showed dormant conduction. A total of n = 24 steam pops were detected in n = 18 patients (39.1%), while no pericardial tamponade occurred. No periprocedural thromboembolic complications occurred, while n = 4 patients (17.4%) showed silent cerebral lesion. TC-HPSD ablation with 90 W/4 s using the QDot-catheter led to a reduction of procedure and RF time, while no major complications occurred. Despite optimized temperature control and power adjustment, steam pops occurred in a rather high number of patients, while none of them leads to tamponade or to clinical or neurological deficits.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
High-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is highly efficient and safe while reducing procedure and RF time in pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The QDot™ catheter is a novel contact force ablation catheter that allows automated flow and power adjustments depending on the local tissue temperature to maintain a target temperature during 90 W/4 s lesions. We analysed intraprocedural data and periprocedural safety using the QDot-catheter in patients undergoing PVI for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF).
METHODS
METHODS
We included n = 48 patients undergoing PVI with the QDot-catheter with a temperature-controlled HPSD ablation mode with 90 W/4 s (TC-HPSD). If focal reconnection occurred besides repeat ablation, the ablation mode was changed to 50 W/15 s (QMode). N = 23 patients underwent cerebral MRI to detect silent cerebral lesions.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Mean RF time was 8.1 ± 2.8 min, and procedure duration was 84.5 ± 30 min. The overall maximal measured catheter tip temperature was 52.0 °C ± 4.6 °C, mean overall applied current was 871 mA ± 44 mA and overall applied energy was 316 J ± 47 J. The mean local impedance drop was 12.1 ± 2.4 Ohms. During adenosine challenge, n = 14 (29%) patients showed dormant conduction. A total of n = 24 steam pops were detected in n = 18 patients (39.1%), while no pericardial tamponade occurred. No periprocedural thromboembolic complications occurred, while n = 4 patients (17.4%) showed silent cerebral lesion.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
TC-HPSD ablation with 90 W/4 s using the QDot-catheter led to a reduction of procedure and RF time, while no major complications occurred. Despite optimized temperature control and power adjustment, steam pops occurred in a rather high number of patients, while none of them leads to tamponade or to clinical or neurological deficits.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35748975
doi: 10.1007/s10840-022-01146-8
pii: 10.1007/s10840-022-01146-8
doi:
Substances chimiques
Steam
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
491-497Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, Akar JG, Badhwar V, Brugada J, Camm J, Chen PS, Chen SA, Chung MK, Nielsen JC, Curtis AB, Davies DW, Day JD, d’Avila A, de Groot N, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Ellinor PT, Ernst S, Fenelon G, Gerstenfeld EP, Haines DE, Haissaguerre M, Helm RH, Hylek E, Jackman WM, Jalife J, Kalman JM, Kautzner J, Kottkamp H, Kuck KH, Kumagai K, Lee R, Lewalter T, Lindsay BD, Macle L, Mansour M, Marchlinski FE, Michaud GF, Nakagawa H, Natale A, Nattel S, Okumura K, Packer D, Pokushalov E, Reynolds MR, Sanders P, Scanavacca M, Schilling R, Tondo C, Tsao HM, Verma A, Wilber DJ, Yamane T. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:e275–444.
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.05.012
pubmed: 28506916
pmcid: 6019327
Macle L, Khairy P, Weerasooriya R, Novak P, Verma A, Willems S, Arentz T, Deisenhofer I, Veenhuyzen G, Scavee C, Jais P, Puererfellner H, Levesque S, Andrade JG, Rivard L, Guerra PG, Dubuc M, Thibault B, Talajic M, Roy D, Nattel S. investigators At: Adenosine-guided pulmonary vein isolation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: an international, multicentre, randomised superiority trial. Lancet. 2015;386:672–9.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60026-5
pubmed: 26211828
Anter E, Contreras-Valdes FM, Shvilkin A, Tschabrunn CM, Josephson ME. Acute pulmonary vein reconnection is a predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence following pulmonary vein isolation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014;39:225–32.
doi: 10.1007/s10840-013-9864-9
pubmed: 24532109
Kottmaier M, Popa M, Bourier F, Reents T, Cifuentes J, Semmler V, et al. Safety and outcome of very high power short duration ablation using 70 Watts for pul- monary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euz342 .
doi: 10.1093/europace/euz342
Leshem E, Zilberman I, Tschabrunn CM, Barkagan M, Contreras-Valdes FM, Govari A, Anter E. High-power and short-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: biophysical characterization. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;4:467–79.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.11.018
pubmed: 30067486
Yavin H, Leshem E, Shapira-Daniels A, et al. Impact of high-power short-duration radio- frequency ablation on long-term lesion durability for atrial fibrillation ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol EP. 2020;6:973–85.
Reddy VY, Grimaldi M, De Potter T, Vijgen JM, Bulava A, Duytschaever MF, Martinek M, Natale A, Knecht S, Neuzil P, Pürerfellner H. Pulmonary vein isolation with very high power, short duration, temperature-controlled lesions: the QDOT-FAST trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019;5(7):778–86.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.04.009
pubmed: 31320006
Lincoff AM, Bittl JA, Harrington RA, Feit F, Kleiman NS, Jackman JD, Sarembock IJ, Cohen DJ, Spriggs D, Ebrahimi R, Keren G, Carr J, Cohen EA, Betriu A, Desmet W, Kereiakes DJ, Rutsch W, Wilcox RG, de Feyter PJ, Vahanian A, Topol EJ. Investigators R-: Bivalirudin and provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared with heparin and planned glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary intervention: REPLACE-2 randomized trial. JAMA. 2003;289:853–63.
doi: 10.1001/jama.289.7.853
pubmed: 12588269
Kottmaier M, Bourier F, Pausch H, Reents T, Semmler V, Telishevska M, Koch-Buttner K, Lennerz C, Lengauer S, Kornmayer M, Rousseva E, Brooks S, Brkic A, Ammar-Busch S, Kaess B, Dillier R, Grebmer C, Kolb C, Hessling G, Deisenhofer I. Safety of uninterrupted periprocedural edoxaban versus phenprocoumon for patients who underwent left atrial catheter ablation procedures. Am J Cardiol. 2018;121:445–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.11.015
pubmed: 29289359
Macle L, Khairy P, Weerasooriya R, Novak P, Verma A, Willems S, Arentz T, Deisenhofer I, Veenhuyzen G, Scavee C, Jais P, Puererfellner H, Levesque S, Andrade JG, Rivard L, Guerra PG, Dubuc M, Thibault B, Talajic M, Roy D, Nattel S and investigators At. Adenosine-guided pulmonary vein isolation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: an international, multicentre, randomised superiority trial. Lancet. 2015;386:672–9.
Bourier F, Duchateau J, Vlachos K, Lam A, Martin CA, Takigawa M, Kitamura T, Frontera A, Cheniti G, Pambrun T, Klotz N, Denis A, Derval N, Cochet H, Sacher F, Hocini M, Haissaguerre M, Jais P. High-power short-duration versus standard radiofrequency ablation: Insights on lesion metrics. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018;29(11):1570–5.
doi: 10.1111/jce.13724
pubmed: 30168230
Deneke T, Halbfaß P, Pürerfellner H. High-power short duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: simply cranking up the energy? Europace. 2020;22(3):335–7.
doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa020
pubmed: 32011664
Deneke T, Jais P, Scaglione M, Schmitt R, Di Biase L, Christopoulos G, Schade A, Mügge A, Bansmann M, Nentwich K, Müller P, Krug J, Roos M, Halbfass P, Natale A, Gaita F, Haines D. Silent cerebral events/lesions related to atrial fibrillation ablation: a clinical review. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26(4):455–63.
doi: 10.1111/jce.12608
pubmed: 25556518
Takigawa M, Kitamura T, Martin CA, Fuimaono K, Datta K, Joshi H, Constantin M, Bourier F, Cheniti G, Duchateau J, Pambrun T, Denis A, Derval N, Sacher F, Cochet H, Hocini M, Haïssaguerre M, Jaïs P. Temperature- and flow-controlled ablation/very-high-power short-duration ablation vs conventional power-controlled ablation: comparison of focal and linear lesion characteristics. Heart Rhythm. 2021;18(4):553–61.
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.10.021
pubmed: 33127542