Derivation and validation of an improved pediatric shock index for predicting need for early intervention and outcomes in pediatric trauma.
Journal
The journal of trauma and acute care surgery
ISSN: 2163-0763
Titre abrégé: J Trauma Acute Care Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101570622
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 10 2022
01 10 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
25
6
2022
medline:
24
9
2022
entrez:
24
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Shock index, pediatric age adjusted (SIPA), has been widely applied in pediatric trauma but has limited precision because of the reference ranges used in its derivation. We hypothesized that a pediatric shock index (PSI) equation based on age-based vital signs would outperform SIPA. A retrospective cohort of trauma patients aged 1 to 18 years from Trauma Quality Programs - Participant Use File 2010 to 2018 was performed. A random 70% training subset was used to derive Youden index-optimizing shock index (SI) cutoffs by age for blood transfusion within 4 hours. We used linear regression to derive equations representing the PSI cutoff for children 12 years or younger and 13 years or older. For children 13 years or older, the well-established SI of 0.9 remained optimal, consistent with SIPA and other indices. For children 12 years or younger in the 30% validation subset, we compared our age-based PSI to SIPA as predictors of early transfusion, mortality, pediatric intensive care unit admission, and injury severity score of ≥25. For bedside use, a simplified "rapid" pediatric shock index (rPSI) equation was also derived and compared with SIPA. A total of 439,699 patients aged 1 to 12 years met the inclusion criteria with 2,718 (1.3% of those with available outcome data) requiring transfusion within 4 hours of presentation. In the validation set, positive predictive values for early transfusion were higher for PSI (8.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.5-9.1%) and rPSI (6.3%; 95% CI, 5.7-6.9%) than SIPA (4.3%; 95% CI, 3.9-4.7%). For early transfusion, negative predictive values for both PSI (99.3%; 95% CI, 99.2-99.3%) and rPSI (99.3%; 95% CI, 99.2-99.4%) were similar to SIPA (99.4%; 95% CI, 99.3-99.4%). We derived the PSI and rPSI for use in pediatric trauma using empiric, age-based SI cutoffs. The PSI and rPSI achieved higher positive predictive values and similar negative predictive values to SIPA in predicting the need for early blood transfusion and mortality. Prognostic/Epidemiological; level III.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Shock index, pediatric age adjusted (SIPA), has been widely applied in pediatric trauma but has limited precision because of the reference ranges used in its derivation. We hypothesized that a pediatric shock index (PSI) equation based on age-based vital signs would outperform SIPA.
METHODS
A retrospective cohort of trauma patients aged 1 to 18 years from Trauma Quality Programs - Participant Use File 2010 to 2018 was performed. A random 70% training subset was used to derive Youden index-optimizing shock index (SI) cutoffs by age for blood transfusion within 4 hours. We used linear regression to derive equations representing the PSI cutoff for children 12 years or younger and 13 years or older. For children 13 years or older, the well-established SI of 0.9 remained optimal, consistent with SIPA and other indices. For children 12 years or younger in the 30% validation subset, we compared our age-based PSI to SIPA as predictors of early transfusion, mortality, pediatric intensive care unit admission, and injury severity score of ≥25. For bedside use, a simplified "rapid" pediatric shock index (rPSI) equation was also derived and compared with SIPA.
RESULTS
A total of 439,699 patients aged 1 to 12 years met the inclusion criteria with 2,718 (1.3% of those with available outcome data) requiring transfusion within 4 hours of presentation. In the validation set, positive predictive values for early transfusion were higher for PSI (8.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.5-9.1%) and rPSI (6.3%; 95% CI, 5.7-6.9%) than SIPA (4.3%; 95% CI, 3.9-4.7%). For early transfusion, negative predictive values for both PSI (99.3%; 95% CI, 99.2-99.3%) and rPSI (99.3%; 95% CI, 99.2-99.4%) were similar to SIPA (99.4%; 95% CI, 99.3-99.4%).
CONCLUSION
We derived the PSI and rPSI for use in pediatric trauma using empiric, age-based SI cutoffs. The PSI and rPSI achieved higher positive predictive values and similar negative predictive values to SIPA in predicting the need for early blood transfusion and mortality.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Prognostic/Epidemiological; level III.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35749746
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003727
pii: 01586154-202210000-00008
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
474-481Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Allgöwer M, Burri C. [“Shock index”]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr . 1967;92(43):1947–1950.
Oestern HJ, Trentz O, Hempelmann G, Trentz OA, Sturm J. Cardiorespiratory and metabolic patterns in multiple trauma patients. Resuscitation . 1979;7(3–4):169–183.
Rady MY, Nightingale P, Little RA, Edwards JD. Shock index: a re-evaluation in acute circulatory failure. Resuscitation . 1992;23(3):227–234.
Birkhahn RH, Gaeta TJ, Terry D, Bove JJ, Tloczkowski J. Shock index in diagnosing early acute hypovolemia. Am J Emerg Med . 2005;23(3):323–326.
Cannon CM, Braxton CC, Kling-Smith M, Mahnken JD, Carlton E, Moncure M. Utility of the shock index in predicting mortality in traumatically injured patients. J Trauma . 2009;67(6):1426–1430.
Rady M, Smithline H, Blake H, Nowak R, Rivers E. A comparison of the shock index and conventional vital signs to identify acute, critical illness in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med . 1994;24(4):685–690.
Acker SN, Ross JT, Partrick DA, Tong S, Bensard DD. Pediatric specific shock index accurately identifies severely injured children. J Pediatr Surg . 2015;50(2):331–334.
Nordin A, Coleman A, Shi J, Wheeler K, Xiang H, Acker S, et. al. Validation of the age-adjusted shock index using pediatric trauma quality improvement program data. J Pediatr Surg 2018;53(1):130–135.
Linnaus ME, Notrica DM, Langlais CS, St. Peter SD, Leys CM, Ostlie DJ, et al. Prospective validation of the shock index pediatric-adjusted (SIPA) in blunt liver and spleen trauma: an ATOMAC + study. J Pediatr Surg . 2017;52(2):340–344.
Acker SN, Bredbeck B, Partrick DA, Kulungowski AM, Barnett CC, Bensard DD. Shock index, pediatric age-adjusted (SIPA) is more accurate than age-adjusted hypotension for trauma team activation. In: Surgery (United States) vol. 161. Mosby Inc.; 2017.
Gandhi G, Claiborne MK, Gross T, Sussman BL, Davenport K, Bulloch B. Comparison of prehospital calculated age-adjusted pediatric shock index (SIPA) to those calculated in the ED for identifying trauma patients that needed the highest-level activation based on consensus criteria. Prehosp Emerg Care . 2020.
Bae W, Kim K, Lee B. Distribution of pediatric vital signs in the emergency department: a nationwide study. Child . 2020;7(8):89.
Sarganas G, Schaffrath Rosario A, Berger S, Neuhauser HK. An unambiguous definition of pediatric hypotension is still lacking: gaps between two percentile-based definitions and Pediatric Advanced Life Support/Advanced Trauma Life Support guidelines. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2019;86(3):448–453.
American College of Surgeons. ATLS Manual 2018 . 10th ed. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2018.
Georgette N, Keskey R, Mbadiwe N, Hampton D, McQueen A, Slidell MB. Alternative shock index cutoffs for pediatric patients outperform the Shock Index Pediatric Age-adjusted (SIPA) on strength of association with adverse outcomes in pediatric trauma patients. Surgery . 2022.
Keskey RC, Hampton DA, Biermann H, Cirone J, Zakrison TL, Cone JT, et al. Novel trauma composite score is a more reliable predictor of mortality than injury severity score in pediatric trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2021; Publish Ah.
Arbuthnot M, Armstrong LB, Mooney DP. Can we safely decrease intensive care unit admissions for children with high grade isolated solid organ injuries? Using the shock index, pediatric age-adjusted and hematocrit to modify APSA admission guidelines. J Pediatr Surg . 2017;52(6):989–992.
Updated APSA Blunt Liver/Spleen Injury Guidelines 2019. Available at: https://apsapedsurg.org/resources/resources/practice-guidelines/apsa-guidelines/ . Accessed July 5, 2020.
Marenco CW, Do WS, Lammers DT, Horton JD, Azarow K, Eckert MJ. Validation of shock index pediatric-adjusted for children injured in warzones. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2020;89(4):642–648.
Polites SF, Moody S, Williams RF, Kayton ML, Alberto EC, Burd RS, et al. Timing and volume of crystalloid and blood products in pediatric trauma — an EAST multicenter prospective observational study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2020;1.
Phillips R, Acker SN, Shahi N, Meier M, Leopold D, Recicar J, et. al. The ABC-D score improves the sensitivity in predicting need for massive transfusion in pediatric trauma patients. J Pediatr Surg 2020;55(2):331–334.
Vandewalle RJ, Peceny JK, Dolejs SC, Raymond JL, Rouse TM. Trends in pediatric adjusted shock index predict morbidity and mortality in children with severe blunt injuries. J Pediatr Surg . 2018;53(2):362–366.
Traynor MD, Hernandez MC, Clarke DL, Kong VY, Habermann EB, Polites SF, et al. Utilization of age-adjusted shock index in a resource-strained setting. J Pediatr Surg . 2019;54(12):2621–2626.
Alberto EC, McKenna E, Amberson MJ, Tashiro J, Donnelly K, Thenappan AA, et al. Metrics of shock in pediatric trauma patients: a systematic search and review. Injury . 2021;52(10):3166–3172.
Polites SF, Nygaard RM, Reddy PN, Zielinski MD, Richardson CJ, Elsbernd TA, et al. Multicenter study of crystalloid boluses and transfusion in pediatric trauma—when to go to blood? J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2018;85(1):108–112.
Lammers DT, Marenco CW, Do WS, Conner JR, Horton JD, Martin MJ, et al. Pediatric adjusted reverse shock index multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale as a prospective predictor for mortality in pediatric trauma. In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery vol. 90. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2021.
Moons KGM, Altman DG, Reitsma JB, Ioannidis JPA, Macaskill P, Steyerberg EW, et al. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med . 2015;162(1):W1–W73. doi:10.7326/M14-0698.
doi: 10.7326/M14-0698
Sidey-Gibbons JAM, Sidey-Gibbons CJ. Machine learning in medicine: a practical introduction. BMC Med Res Methodol . 2019;19(1).
Muschelli J. ROC and AUC with a binary predictor: a potentially misleading metric. J Classif . 2020;37(3):696–708.
Kosinski AS. A weighted generalized score statistic for comparison of predictive values of diagnostic tests. Stat Med . 2013;32(6):964–977.
Clayton PCUTPT. Stata module for empirical estimation of cutpoint for a diagnostic test. Stat Softw Components . 2013.
American College of Surgeons. Committee on Trauma. Advanced trauma life support: Student course manual . Tenth ed. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2018.
Strutt J, Flood A, Kharbanda AB. Shock index as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in pediatric trauma patients. In: Pediatric Emergency Care vol. 35. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2019.
Nordin A, Shi J, Wheeler K, Xiang H, Kenney B. Age-adjusted shock index: from injury to arrival. J Pediatr Surg . 2019;54(5):984–988.